Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals.Methods Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation.Results Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation.Conclusion Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals.Methods Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation.Results Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation.Conclusion Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions.
참고문헌 (21)
- Berardelli A, "Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man", Exp Brain Res, 122, pp.79~84 (1998)
- Pascual-Leone A, "Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation", J Clin Neurophysiol, 15, pp.333~343 (1998)
- Maeda F, "Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation", Clin Neurophysiol, 111, pp.800~805 (2000)
- Kim YH, "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationinduced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke", Stroke, 37, pp.1471~1476 (2006)
- Nitsche MA, "Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008", Brain Stimul, 1, pp.206~223 (2008)
- Nitsche MA, "Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans", Neurology, 57, pp.1899~1901 (2001)
- Nitsche MA, "Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex", Clin Neurophysiol, 114, pp.600~604 (2003)
- Vines BW, "Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated", Eur J Neurosci, 28, pp.1667~1673 (2008)
- Vines BW, "Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation", Neuroreport, 17, pp.671~674 (2006)
- Netz J, "Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition in man", Exp Brain Res, 104, pp.527~533 (1995)
- Gorsler A, "Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans", Clin Neurophysiol, 114, pp.1800~1807 (2003)
- Murphy TH, "Plasticity during stroke recovery:from synapse to behaviour", Nat Rev Neurosci, 10, pp.861~872 (2009)
- Mordillo-Mateos L, "Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex", Brain Stimul, 5, pp.214~222 (2012)
- Nitsche MA, "Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex", J Neurosci, 27, pp.3807~3812 (2007)
- Rossini PM, "Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 91, pp.79~92 (1994)
- Priori A, "Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp", Neuroreport, 9, pp.2257~2260 (1998)
- Wade DT, "Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke", Int Disabil Stud, 11, pp.89~92 (1989)
- Boissy P, "Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function", Clin Rehabil, 13, pp.354~362 (1999)
- Vines BW, "Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects’ non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemi sphere stimulation", BMC Neurosci, 9, pp.103~ (2008)
- Ferbert A, "Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex", J Physiol, 453, pp.525~546 (1992)
- Siebner HR, "Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex", J Neurosci, 24, pp.3379~3385 (2004)