Range of Motion of the Ankle According to Pushing Force, Gender and Knee Position
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the difference of range of motion (ROM) of ankle according to pushing force, gender and knee position.Methods One hundred and twenty-eight healthy adults (55 men, 73 women) between the ages of 20 and 51, were included in the study. One examiner measured the passive range of motion (PROM) of ankle by Dualer IQ Inclinometers and Commander Muscle Testing. ROM of ankle dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) according to change of pushing force and knee position were measured at prone position.Results There was significant correlation between ROM and pushing force, the more pushing force leads the more ROM at ankle DF and ankle PF. Knee flexion of 90° position showed low PF angle and high ankle DF angle, as compared to the at neutral position of knee joint. ROM of ankle DF for female was greater than for male, with no significant difference. ROM of ankle PF for female was greater than male regardless of the pushing force.Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the relationship between pushing force and ROM of ankle joint. There was significant correlation between ROM of ankle and pushing force. ROM of ankle PF for female estimated greater than male regardless of the pushing force and the number of measurement. The ROM of the ankle is measured differently according to the knee joint position. Pushing force, gender and knee joint position are required to be considered when measuring the ROM of ankle joint.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the difference of range of motion (ROM) of ankle according to pushing force, gender and knee position.Methods One hundred and twenty-eight healthy adults (55 men, 73 women) between the ages of 20 and 51, were included in the study. One examiner measured the passive range of motion (PROM) of ankle by Dualer IQ Inclinometers and Commander Muscle Testing. ROM of ankle dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) according to change of pushing force and knee position were measured at prone position.Results There was significant correlation between ROM and pushing force, the more pushing force leads the more ROM at ankle DF and ankle PF. Knee flexion of 90° position showed low PF angle and high ankle DF angle, as compared to the at neutral position of knee joint. ROM of ankle DF for female was greater than for male, with no significant difference. ROM of ankle PF for female was greater than male regardless of the pushing force.Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the relationship between pushing force and ROM of ankle joint. There was significant correlation between ROM of ankle and pushing force. ROM of ankle PF for female estimated greater than male regardless of the pushing force and the number of measurement. The ROM of the ankle is measured differently according to the knee joint position. Pushing force, gender and knee joint position are required to be considered when measuring the ROM of ankle joint.
참고문헌 (22)
- Wong Y, "Passive motion characteristics of the talocrural and the subtalar joint by dual Euler angles", J Biomech, 38, pp.2480~2485 (2005)
- Leardini A, "Kinematics of the human ankle complex in passive flexion;a single degree of freedom system", J Biomech, 32, pp.111~118 (1999)
- Roaas A, "Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40years of age", Acta Orthop Scand, 53, pp.205~208 (1982)
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, "Joint motion: methods of measuring and recording" (1966), Churchill Livingstone
- Ahlberg A, "On geographical variations in the normal range of joint motion", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 234, pp.229~231 (1988)
- James B, "Active and passive mobility of lower limb joints in elderly men and women", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 68, pp.162~167 (1989)
- Macedo LG, "Differences in range of motion between dominant and nondominant sides of upper and lower extremities", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 31, pp.577~582 (2008)
- Youdas JW, "Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.1113~1118 (1993)
- Grimston SK, "Differences in ankle joint complex range of motion as a function of age", Foot Ankle, 14, pp.215~222 (1993)
- Kumar S, "Normal range of motion of hip and ankle in Indian population", Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 45, pp.421~424 (2011)
- Venturini C, "Intrarater and interrater reliability of two methods for measuring the active range of motion for ankle dorsiflexion in healthy subjects", Rev Bras Fisioter, 10, pp.407~411 (2006)
- de Winter AF, "Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 5, pp.18~ (2004)
- Belcjak CE, "The differences in the ankle range of motion in distinct ethnical groups measured by goniometry", Phlebologie, 38, pp.59~63 (2009)
- Keating JL, "Measurements of ankle dorsiflexion in stroke subjects obtained using standardised dorsiflexion force", Aust J Physiother, 46, pp.203~213 (2000)
- Moseley A, "Measurement of passive ankle dorsiflexion: procedure and reliability", Aust J Physiother, 37, pp.175~181 (1991)
- Hallaceli H, "Normal hip, knee and ankle range of motion in the Turkish population", Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 48, pp.37~42 (2014)
- Kendall FP, "Muscle: testing and function with posture and pain", pp.359~464 (2005), Saunders
- Mitchell B, "Effect of pelvic, hip, and knee position on ankle joint range of motion", Phys Ther Sport, 9, pp.202~208 (2008)
- Gerlach UJ, "Functional construction of the superficial and deep fascia system of the lower limb in man", Acta Anat (Basel), 139, pp.11~25 (1990)
- Cho SH, "Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98healthy Korean adults", Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 19, pp.145~152 (2004)
- Chung MJ, "The effect of age and gender on joint range of motion of worker population in Taiwan", Int J Ind Ergon, 39, pp.596~600 (2009)
- Baldwin JN, "1000 Norms Project: understanding foot and ankle health, disease and normality", J Foot Ankle Res, 7(Suppl 1), pp.A6~ (2014)