Factors impacting patient cooperation during elective gastroscopy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Some people have difficulty tolerating upper endoscopy. The cause of and risk factors for this are not well known. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors involved in poor cooperation during screening upper endoscopy. Methods: A total of 4,422 subjects who underwent a health inspection with upper endoscopy carried out by a single experienced endoscopist were included. We retrospectively investigated subjects’ self-reporting questionnaires and medical records, including endoscopic and histologic findings. The examinees’ cooperation and the completeness of endoscopic examination were evaluated based on the operator’s subjective judgment. Results: Examinee cooperation during the endoscopic procedure was poor in 358 out of 4,422 subjects (8.1%). Of the subjects with poor cooperation, the endoscopic examination was incomplete in 36 subjects (10.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that young age (< 40 years), female sex, high body mass index (≥ 25), hiatal hernia, and procedural sedation using midazolam were independent risk factors for poor cooperation. Conclusions: Cooperation during screening upper endoscopy was poor in a considerable number of examinees. Endoscopists must keep in mind that examinee cooperation is more likely to be poor in the young, obese people, women, patients with hiatal hernias, and those who receive procedural sedation.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Some people have difficulty tolerating upper endoscopy. The cause of and risk factors for this are not well known. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors involved in poor cooperation during screening upper endoscopy. Methods: A total of 4,422 subjects who underwent a health inspection with upper endoscopy carried out by a single experienced endoscopist were included. We retrospectively investigated subjects’ self-reporting questionnaires and medical records, including endoscopic and histologic findings. The examinees’ cooperation and the completeness of endoscopic examination were evaluated based on the operator’s subjective judgment. Results: Examinee cooperation during the endoscopic procedure was poor in 358 out of 4,422 subjects (8.1%). Of the subjects with poor cooperation, the endoscopic examination was incomplete in 36 subjects (10.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that young age (< 40 years), female sex, high body mass index (≥ 25), hiatal hernia, and procedural sedation using midazolam were independent risk factors for poor cooperation. Conclusions: Cooperation during screening upper endoscopy was poor in a considerable number of examinees. Endoscopists must keep in mind that examinee cooperation is more likely to be poor in the young, obese people, women, patients with hiatal hernias, and those who receive procedural sedation.
참고문헌 (20)
- Dan YY, "Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 4, pp.709~716 (2006)
- Mahajan RJ, "Predictors of patient cooperation during gastrointestinal endoscopy", J Clin Gastroenterol, 24, pp.220~223 (1997)
- Evans LT, "Pharyngeal anesthesia during sedated EGDs: is “the spray”beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.761~766 (2006)
- Roman S, "The diagnosis and management of hiatus hernia", BMJ, 349, pp.g6154~ (2014)
- Menon S, "Risk factors in the aetiology of hiatus hernia: a meta-analysis", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 23, pp.133~138 (2011)
- Cohen LB, "AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.675~701 (2007)
- Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, "Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.815~826 (2008)
- Triantafillidis JK, "Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.463~481 (2013)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation, "Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists", Anesthesiology, 96, pp.1004~1017 (2002)
- Tytgat GN., "The Sydney System: endoscopic division. Endoscopic appearances in gastritis", duodenitis, 1991, pp.6, 223~234
- Nomura S, "Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric mucosal atrophy: multicenter prospective study", Dig Endosc, 26, pp.709~719 (2014)
- Ahn SY, "Endoscopic diagnosis of open-type atrophic gastritis is related to the histological diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia and Cdx2 expression", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.1119~1126 (2011)
- Frank SH, "Stress in the clinical setting: the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument", J Fam Pract, 26, pp.533~539 (1988)
- Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring depression", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 4, pp.561~571 (1961)
- 이상표, "The Effect of Emotional Stress and Depression on the Prevalence of Digestive Diseases", Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (JNM), 21(2), pp.273~282 (2015), 대한소화기 기능성질환∙운동학회[DOI]
- Song EM, "The association between reflux esophagitis and psychosocial stress", Dig Dis Sci, 58, pp.471~477 (2013)
- Fillingim RB, "Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings", J Pain, 10, pp.447~485 (2009)
- Arendt-Nielsen L, "Visceral pain: gender differences in response to experimental and clinical pain", Eur J Pain, 8, pp.465~472 (2004)
- Pandolfino JE, "Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.639~649 (2006)
- Wilson LJ, "Association of obesity with hiatal hernia and esophagitis", Am J Gastroenterol, 94, pp.2840~2844 (1999)