An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The number of medical studies being published is increasing exponentially, and clinicians must routinely process large amounts of new information. Moreover, the results of individual studies are often insufficient to provide confident answers, as their results are not consistently reproducible. A meta-analysis is a statistical method for combining the results of different studies on the same topic and it may resolve conflicts among studies. Meta-analysis is being used increasingly and plays an important role in medical research. This review introduces the basic concepts, steps, advantages, and caveats of meta-analysis, to help clinicians understand it in clinical practice and research. A major advantage of a metaanalysis is that it produces a precise estimate of the effect size, with considerably increased statistical power, which is important when the power of the primary study is limited because of a small sample size. A meta-analysis may yield conclusive results when individual studies are inconclusive. Furthermore, meta-analyses investigate the source of variation and different effects among subgroups. In summary, a meta-analysis is an objective, quantitative method that provides less biased estimates on a specific topic. Understanding how to conduct a meta-analysis aids clinicians in the process of making clinical decisions.
Abstract
The number of medical studies being published is increasing exponentially, and clinicians must routinely process large amounts of new information. Moreover, the results of individual studies are often insufficient to provide confident answers, as their results are not consistently reproducible. A meta-analysis is a statistical method for combining the results of different studies on the same topic and it may resolve conflicts among studies. Meta-analysis is being used increasingly and plays an important role in medical research. This review introduces the basic concepts, steps, advantages, and caveats of meta-analysis, to help clinicians understand it in clinical practice and research. A major advantage of a metaanalysis is that it produces a precise estimate of the effect size, with considerably increased statistical power, which is important when the power of the primary study is limited because of a small sample size. A meta-analysis may yield conclusive results when individual studies are inconclusive. Furthermore, meta-analyses investigate the source of variation and different effects among subgroups. In summary, a meta-analysis is an objective, quantitative method that provides less biased estimates on a specific topic. Understanding how to conduct a meta-analysis aids clinicians in the process of making clinical decisions.
참고문헌 (38)
- Murad MH, "How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users' guides to the medical literature", JAMA, 312, pp.171~179 (2014)[DOI]
- Button KS, "Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience", Nat Rev Neurosci, 14, pp.365~376 (2013)[DOI]
- Haidich AB, "Meta-analysis in medical research", Hippokratia, 14(Suppl 1), pp.29~37 (2010)
- Sackett DL, "Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 455, pp.3~5 (2007)
- Guyatt GH, "Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group", JAMA, 274, pp.1800~1804 (1995)[DOI]
- Glass GV, "Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research", Educ Res, 5, pp.3~8 (1976)
- Walker E, "Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations", Cleve Clin J Med, 75, pp.431~439 (2008)[DOI]
- Egger M, "Meta-analysis: principles and procedures", BMJ, 315, pp.1533~1537 (1997)[DOI]
- Gotzsche PC, "Why we need a broad perspective on metaanalysis. It may be crucially important for patients", BMJ, 321, pp.585~586 (2000)[DOI]
- Leenaars M, "A step-bystep guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies", Lab Anim, 46, pp.24~31 (2012)[DOI]
- Qi X, "Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in systematic review", PLoS One, 8, pp.e71838~ (2013)[DOI]
- Whitehead A, "A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials", Stat Med, 10, pp.1665~1677 (1991)[DOI]
- Munafo MR, "Meta-analysis of genetic association studies", Trends Genet, 20, pp.439~444 (2004)[DOI]
- Higgins JP, "Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis", Stat Med, 21, pp.1539~1558 (2002)[DOI]
- Thakkinstian A, "A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies", Stat Med, 24, pp.1291~1306 (2005)[DOI]
- Davey Smith G, "Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials", Lancet, 350, pp.1182~ (1997)
- DerSimonian R, "Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update", Contemp Clin Trials, 28, pp.105~114 (2007)[DOI]
- Hedges LV, "Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis", Psychol Methods, 3, pp.486~504 (1998)[DOI]
- Ried K, "Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs: a practical guide", Aust Fam Physician, 35, pp.635~638 (2006)
- Zintzaras E, "Synthesis of genetic association studies for pertinent gene-disease associations requires appropriate methodological and statistical approaches", J Clin Epidemiol, 61, pp.634~645 (2008)[DOI]
- Salanti G, "Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies", Genet Med, 7, pp.13~20 (2005)[DOI]
- Copas J, "Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis", Biostatistics, 1, pp.247~262 (2000)[DOI]
- Thompson SG, "How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?", Stat Med, 21, pp.1559~1573 (2002)[DOI]
- Dickersin K, "Publication bias: the problem that won't go away", Ann N Y Acad Sci, 703, pp.135~146 (1993)[DOI]
- Egger M, "Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test", BMJ, 315, pp.629~634 (1997)[DOI]
- Sterne JA, "Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis", J Clin Epidemiol, 54, pp.1046~1055 (2001)[DOI]
- Lau J, "The case of the misleading funnel plot", BMJ, 333, pp.597~600 (2006)[DOI]
- Duval S, "Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plotbased method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis", Biometrics, 56, pp.455~463 (2000)[DOI]
- Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement", Ann Intern Med, 151, pp.264~269 (2009)[DOI]
- Bailar JC 3rd, "The promise and problems of meta-analysis", N Engl J Med, 337, pp.559~561 (1997)[DOI]
- Sharpe D, "Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away", Clin Psychol Rev, 17, pp.881~901 (1997)[DOI]
- Changelian PS, "Prevention of organ allograft rejection by a specific Janus kinase 3 inhibitor", Science, 302, pp.875~878 (2003)[DOI]
- 송관규, "Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 29(5), pp.656~663 (2014), 대한내과학회[DOI]
- 이영호, "Meta-Analysis of Genetic Association Studies", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 35(3), pp.283~287 (2015), 대한진단검사의학회
- Lee YH, "Gene-environmental interaction between smoking and shared epitope on the development of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis", Int J Rheum Dis, 17, pp.528~535 (2014)
- Song G, "Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for interstitial lung disease in patients with connective tissue diseases: a meta-analysis", Clin Exp Rheumatol, 34, pp.11~16 (2016)
- Song GG, "Association between TNF-<TEX>${\alpha}$<", TEX> (-308 A, G, -857 C, pp.T) polymorphisms and responsiveness to TNF-<TEX>${\alpha}$<, TEX> blockers in spondyloarthropathy, psoriasis and Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis[DOI]
- Lee YH, "Systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis", Hum Genet, 118, pp.434~443 (2005)[DOI]