Efficacy of preoperative percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis according to severity grades
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) according to severity. Methods: A total of 325 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between January 2008 and October 2010 were enrolled. Patients were classified into three groups based on severity grade according to the Tokyo guidelines for AC: grade I (mild), grade II (moderate), and grade III (severe). These groups were further classified into two subgroups based on whether or not they underwent preoperative PC. Results: A total of 184 patients were classified into the grade I group (57%), 135 patients were classified into the grade II group (42%), and five patients were classified into the grade III group (1%). In the grade I and II groups, the mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the patients who did not undergo PC than in those who received PC (10.7 ± 4.4 vs. 13.7 ± 5.8, p < 0.001; 11.8 ± 6.5 vs.16.9 ± 12.5, p = 0.003, respectively). The mean length of preoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the patients without PC than in those with PC in the grade I and II groups (5.8 ± 3.3 vs. 8.2 ± 4.6, p = 0.001; 6.0 ± 4.4 vs. 8.8 ± 5.2, p = 0.002). In addition, the operative time was shorter in patients without PC, especially in the grade I group (94.6 ± 36.4 vs. 107.3 ± 33.5, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Preoperative PC should be reserved for only selected patients with mild or moderate AC. No significant benefit of preoperative PC was identified with respect to clinical outcome or complications.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) according to severity. Methods: A total of 325 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between January 2008 and October 2010 were enrolled. Patients were classified into three groups based on severity grade according to the Tokyo guidelines for AC: grade I (mild), grade II (moderate), and grade III (severe). These groups were further classified into two subgroups based on whether or not they underwent preoperative PC. Results: A total of 184 patients were classified into the grade I group (57%), 135 patients were classified into the grade II group (42%), and five patients were classified into the grade III group (1%). In the grade I and II groups, the mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the patients who did not undergo PC than in those who received PC (10.7 ± 4.4 vs. 13.7 ± 5.8, p < 0.001; 11.8 ± 6.5 vs.16.9 ± 12.5, p = 0.003, respectively). The mean length of preoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the patients without PC than in those with PC in the grade I and II groups (5.8 ± 3.3 vs. 8.2 ± 4.6, p = 0.001; 6.0 ± 4.4 vs. 8.8 ± 5.2, p = 0.002). In addition, the operative time was shorter in patients without PC, especially in the grade I group (94.6 ± 36.4 vs. 107.3 ± 33.5, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Preoperative PC should be reserved for only selected patients with mild or moderate AC. No significant benefit of preoperative PC was identified with respect to clinical outcome or complications.
참고문헌 (24)
- Polychronidis A, "Twenty years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Philippe Mouret: March 17, 1987", JSLS, 12, pp.109~111 (2008)
- Gurusamy KS, "Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4) (2006)
- Johansson M, "Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial", J Gastrointest Surg, 7, pp.642~645 (2003)[DOI]
- Papi C, "Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.147~155 (2004)[DOI]
- Vauthey JN, "Indications and limitations of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis", Surg Gynecol Obstet, 176, pp.49~54 (1993)
- Melin MM, "Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a valuable technique in high-risk patients with presumed acute cholecystitis", Br J Surg, 82, pp.1274~1277 (1995)[DOI]
- Patel M, "Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis", Am Surg, 66, pp.33~37 (2000)
- Kuster GG, "Laparoscopic cholecystostomy with delayed cholecystectomy as an alternative to conversion to open procedure", Surg Endosc, 10, pp.426~428 (1996)[DOI]
- Kim HO, "Impact of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with complicated acute cholecystitis", Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 19, pp.20~24 (2009)[DOI]
- Paran H, "Prospective evaluation of patients with acute cholecystitis treated with percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy", Int J Surg, 4, pp.101~105 (2006)[DOI]
- Tseng LJ, "Palliative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage of gallbladder empyema before laparoscopic cholecystectomy", Hepatogastroenterology, 47, pp.932~936 (2000)
- Hirota M, "Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 14, pp.78~82 (2007)[DOI]
- Yokoe M, "TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos)", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 20, pp.35~46 (2013)[DOI]
- Yamashita Y, "Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 14, pp.91~97 (2007)[DOI]
- Han IW, "Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 19, pp.187~193 (2012)[DOI]
- Tsumura H, "An evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.839~844 (2004)[DOI]
- Chikamori F, "Early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis", Surg Endosc, 16, pp.1704~1707 (2002)[DOI]
- Abi-Haidar Y, "Revisiting percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis based on a 10-year experience", Arch Surg, 147, pp.416~422 (2012)
- Winbladh A, "Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis", HPB (Oxford), 11, pp.183~193 (2009)[DOI]
- Anderson JE, "A nationwide examination of outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy compared with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, 1998-2010", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.3406~3411 (2013)[DOI]
- Schafer M, "Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis", Am J Surg, 182, pp.291~297 (2001)[DOI]
- Kim JH, "Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis", J Gastrointest Surg, 12, pp.829~835 (2008)[DOI]
- Kim KH, "Percutaneous gallbladder drainage for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis", Am J Surg, 179, pp.111~113 (2000)[DOI]
- Campanile FC, "The need for new "patient-related" guidelines for the treatment of acute cholecystitis", World J Emerg Surg, 6, pp.44~ (2011)[DOI]