Maternal and neonatal outcomes in Korean women with type 2 diabetes
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in Korean women with type 2 diabetes and nondiabetic controls. Methods: We performed a retrospective survey of 200 pregnancies in women with type 2 diabetes (n = 100) and nondiabetic controls (n = 100) who delivered from 2003 to 2010 at Cheil General Hospital & Women’s Healthcare Center, Korea. We compared maternal characteristics as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes between groups matched by age, pre-pregnancy weight, body mass index, parity, and gestational age at delivery. Results: The number of infants that were small for gestational age and the rate of major congenital malformations were not significantly different. However, women with type 2 diabetes showed a slightly higher risk for primary caesarean section (35.0% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.006) as well as pre-eclampsia (10.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.017), infections during pregnancy (26.0% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001), neonatal weight (3,370 ± 552.0 vs. 3,196 ± 543.3, p = 0.025), large for gestational age (22.0% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.011), and macrosomia (15.0% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.018) compared to nondiabetic controls. Conclusions: Maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with type 2 diabetes were worse than those for nondiabetic controls. Diabetic women have a higher risk for primary caesarean section, pre-eclampsia, infections during pregnancy, large neonatal birth weight, large for gestational age, and macrosomia.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in Korean women with type 2 diabetes and nondiabetic controls. Methods: We performed a retrospective survey of 200 pregnancies in women with type 2 diabetes (n = 100) and nondiabetic controls (n = 100) who delivered from 2003 to 2010 at Cheil General Hospital & Women’s Healthcare Center, Korea. We compared maternal characteristics as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes between groups matched by age, pre-pregnancy weight, body mass index, parity, and gestational age at delivery. Results: The number of infants that were small for gestational age and the rate of major congenital malformations were not significantly different. However, women with type 2 diabetes showed a slightly higher risk for primary caesarean section (35.0% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.006) as well as pre-eclampsia (10.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.017), infections during pregnancy (26.0% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001), neonatal weight (3,370 ± 552.0 vs. 3,196 ± 543.3, p = 0.025), large for gestational age (22.0% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.011), and macrosomia (15.0% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.018) compared to nondiabetic controls. Conclusions: Maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with type 2 diabetes were worse than those for nondiabetic controls. Diabetic women have a higher risk for primary caesarean section, pre-eclampsia, infections during pregnancy, large neonatal birth weight, large for gestational age, and macrosomia.
참고문헌 (22)
- Wild S, "Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030", Diabetes Care, 27, pp.1047~1053 (2004)
- Dunstan DW, "The rising prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance:the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study", Diabetes Care, 25, pp.829~834 (2002)
- Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH), "Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes 2002-2003: England, Wales and Northern Ireland" (2005), CEMACH
- Lawrence JM, "Trends in the prevalence of preexisting diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus among a racially", ethnically diverse population of pregnant women, 1999-2005, 2008, pp.31, 899~904
- Verheijen EC, "Outcomes of pregnancies in women with pre-existing type 1 or type 2 diabetes, in an ethnically mixed population", BJOG, 112, pp.1500~1503 (2005)
- Brydon P, "Pregnancy outcome in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus needs to be addressed", Int J Clin Pract, 54, pp.418~419 (2000)
- Stamler EF, "High infectious morbidity in pregnant women with insulin-dependent diabetes: an understated complication", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 163(4 Pt 1), pp.1217~1221 (1990)
- Macintosh MC, "Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: population based study", BMJ, 333, pp.177~ (2006)
- Kitzmiller JL, "Pre-conception care of diabetes, congenital malformations, and spontaneous abortions", Diabetes Care, 19, pp.514~541 (1996)
- Remsberg KE, "Diabetes in pregnancy and cesarean delivery", Diabetes Care, 22, pp.1561~1567 (1999)
- Buttaro TM, "Primary Care: A Collaborative Practice", pp.2013, Elsevier
- Lechat MF, "Registries of congenital anomalies:EUROCAT", Environ Health Perspect, 101(Suppl 2), pp.153~157 (1993)
- Wahabi HA, "Pre-existing diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes", BMC Res Notes, 5, pp.496~ (2012)
- MacDorman MF, "Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes", Clin Perinatol, 35, pp.293~307 (2008)
- Knight KM, "Perinatal outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic patients matched by body mass index", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 25, pp.611~615 (2012)
- Modanlou HD, "Large-for-gestational-age neonates: anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia", Obstet Gynecol, 60, pp.417~423 (1982)
- Spellacy WN, "Macrosomia:maternal characteristics and infant complications", Obstet Gynecol, 66, pp.158~161 (1985)
- Murphy HR, "Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: randomised clinical trial", BMJ, 337, pp.a1680~ (2008)
- Gluck L, "Lecithin-sphingomyelin ratios in amniotic fluid in normal and abnormal pregnancy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 115, pp.539~546 (1973)
- Gluck L, "Biochemical development of surface activity in mammalian lung. IV. Pulmonary lecithin synthesis in the human fetus and newborn and etiology of the respiratory distress syndrome", Pediatr Res, 6, pp.81~99 (1972)
- Inkster ME, "Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of observational studies", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 6, pp.30~ (2006)
- Klingensmith GJ, "Pregnancy outcomes in youth with type 2 diabetes: the TODAY study experience", Diabetes Care, 39, pp.122~129 (2016)