본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Progression of ascending aortopathy may not occur after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in severe bicuspid aortic stenosis

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: We evaluated changes in the ascending aorta dimension post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. Methods: Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR at Seoul National University Hospital were consecutively recruited. Patients with less than 12 months’ follow-up and/or with an ascending aorta size larger than 50 mm were excluded. The ascending aorta size was measured on a parasternal long axis view using transthoracic echocardiography. Results: Among the 67 patients who were included (age: 76.5 ± 6.5 years; male: 52.2%; AV area: 0.67 ± 0.15 cm2), 19 (28.4%) had BiAV; 48 (71.6%) had TAV. The median (interquartile ranges) follow-up duration was 398 days (361 to 451). BiAV patients were younger (73.2 ± 7.2 vs. 77.8 ± 5.8, p = 0.008), and had lower incidences of chronic renal disease (5.3% vs. 35.4%, p = 0.014) and history of coronary intervention (15.8% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.013), than TAV patients. On pre-procedural echocardiography, the ascending aorta dimensions in BiAV patients were larger than those in TAV patients (40.5 ± 3.8 mm vs. 35.9 ± 4.2 mm, p < 0.005). The ascending aorta dimension changed minimally during follow-up; post-TAVR, the ascending aorta’s growth rate was –0.11 ± 1.9 and 0.26 ± 1.8 mm/yr in patients with BiAV and TAV, respectively (p = 0.50). Progression of the ascending aorta’s dimension post- TAVR was not clinically significant in BiAV patients. Conclusions: The concern about the progression of aortopathy in BiAV patients post-TAVR may not be a clinical issue. This should be confirmed in studies with a larger population and with a longer follow-up duration.

Abstract

Background/Aims: We evaluated changes in the ascending aorta dimension post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. Methods: Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR at Seoul National University Hospital were consecutively recruited. Patients with less than 12 months’ follow-up and/or with an ascending aorta size larger than 50 mm were excluded. The ascending aorta size was measured on a parasternal long axis view using transthoracic echocardiography. Results: Among the 67 patients who were included (age: 76.5 ± 6.5 years; male: 52.2%; AV area: 0.67 ± 0.15 cm2), 19 (28.4%) had BiAV; 48 (71.6%) had TAV. The median (interquartile ranges) follow-up duration was 398 days (361 to 451). BiAV patients were younger (73.2 ± 7.2 vs. 77.8 ± 5.8, p = 0.008), and had lower incidences of chronic renal disease (5.3% vs. 35.4%, p = 0.014) and history of coronary intervention (15.8% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.013), than TAV patients. On pre-procedural echocardiography, the ascending aorta dimensions in BiAV patients were larger than those in TAV patients (40.5 ± 3.8 mm vs. 35.9 ± 4.2 mm, p < 0.005). The ascending aorta dimension changed minimally during follow-up; post-TAVR, the ascending aorta’s growth rate was –0.11 ± 1.9 and 0.26 ± 1.8 mm/yr in patients with BiAV and TAV, respectively (p = 0.50). Progression of the ascending aorta’s dimension post- TAVR was not clinically significant in BiAV patients. Conclusions: The concern about the progression of aortopathy in BiAV patients post-TAVR may not be a clinical issue. This should be confirmed in studies with a larger population and with a longer follow-up duration.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Leon MB, "Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients", N Engl J Med, 374, pp.1609~1620 (2016)
  2. Thourani VH, "Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients : a propensity score analysis", Lancet, 387, pp.2218~2225 (2016)
  3. Roberts WC, "Frequency of congenitally bicuspid aortic valves in patients ≥80 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis(with or without aortic regurgitation)and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation", Am J Cardiol, 109, pp.1632~1636 (2012)
  4. Himbert D, "Feasibility and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valves", Am J Cardiol, 110, pp.877~883 (2012)
  5. Hayashida K, "Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis", Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 6, pp.284~291 (2013)
  6. Bauer T, "Comparison of the effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves(from the German TAVI Registry)", Am J Cardiol, 113, pp.518~521 (2014)
  7. Fedak PW, "Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve", Circulation, 106, pp.900~904 (2002)
  8. Keane MG, "Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions", Circulation, 102(19 Suppl 3), pp.III35~III39 (2000)
  9. Fernandes S, "Bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortic dilation in the young", Heart, 98, pp.1014~1019 (2012)
  10. Nistri S, "Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves", Heart, 82, pp.19~22 (1999)
  11. Roberts CS, "Dissection of the aorta associated with congenital malformation of the aortic valve", J Am Coll Cardiol, 17, pp.712~716 (1991)
  12. Nishimura RA, "2014 AHA", ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease : a report of the American College of Cardiology, J Am Coll Cardiol, pp.2014, 63[DOI]
  13. Leon MB, "Standardized endpoint definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation clinical trials : a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium", J Am Coll Cardiol, 57, pp.253~269 (2011)
  14. Zoghbi WA, "Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound : a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the task force on prosthetic valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography", J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 22, pp.975~1014 (2009)
  15. Hiratzka LF, "2010 ACCF", AHA, ACR, pp.ASA, SCA[DOI]
  16. Elefteriades JA, "Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms : indications for surgery, and surgical versus nonsurgical risks", Ann Thorac Surg, 74, pp.S1877~S1880 (2002)
  17. Costopoulos C, "Comparison of results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid or nonbicuspid valves", Am J Cardiol, 113, pp.1390~1393 (2014)
  18. Kochman J, "Comparison of oneand 12-month outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves(results from a multicenter registry)", Am J Cardiol, 114, pp.757~762 (2014)
  19. Mylotte D, "Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease", J Am Coll Cardiol, 64, pp.2330~2339 (2014)
  20. Yousef A, "Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve : a patient level multi-center analysis", Int J Cardiol, 189, pp.282~288 (2015)
  21. Leon MB, "Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery", N Engl J Med, 363, pp.1597~1607 (2010)
  22. Chiam PT, "Percutaneous transcatheter heart valve implantation in a bicuspid aortic valve", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 3, pp.559~561 (2010)
  23. Yoon SH, "Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early-and new-generation devices in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis", J Am Coll Cardiol, 68, pp.1195~1205 (2016)
  24. Garg V, "Mutations in NOTCH1cause aortic valve disease", Nature, 437, pp.270~274 (2005)
  25. Erbel R, "2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases : document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)", Eur Heart J, 35, pp.2873~2926 (2014)
  26. Kim YG, "Aortopathy and bicuspid aortic valve : haemodynamic burden is main contributor to aortic dilatation", Heart, 98, pp.1822~1827 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

Mid-term Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Korean Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve in a Tertiary Referral Hospital이사민, Byung Joo Sun, Dae-Hee Kim, Duk-Hyun Kang, Jae-Kwan Song, Jeong Yoon Jang, Ji Hye Lee, Jin Kyung Oh, JongMinSong, Sun Hack Lee한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2019 · 제27권 제2호Progression Rate of Aortic Valve Stenosis in Korean Patients류동열, 박성지, 박승우, 오재건, 이상철, 이현종, 장성아, 최진오, 한혜진한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2010 · 제18권 제4호Recent updates in transcatheter aortic valve implantation김웅, 조정환영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2018 · 제35권 제1호Comparison of Early Clinical Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients Older than 80 Years with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis이삭, 임의, 고영국, 곽영란, 김병극, 김중선, 신동호, 심재광, 심지영, 장병철, 장양수, 장혁재, 최동훈, 홍명기연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2013 · 제54권 제3호Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Unresolved Issues and Role of Imaging Specialists송재관한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2015 · 제23권 제1호Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Concentric Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis and Its Regression after Valve Replacement강덕현, 김대희, 서정숙, 선병주, 송재관, 송종민, 장정윤한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2016 · 제24권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)