Validation of the Korean Frailty Index in community- dwelling older adults in a nationwide Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort study
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: We aimed to assess validity of the Korean Frailty Index (KFI) and the modified KFI (mKFI) in nationwide Korean population as screening measures for frailty status in older adults. Methods: Analysis was performed in the records of baseline assessments of 2,886 participants in the Korean Frailty Aging Cohort study from 2016 to 2017. The KFI included eight items on a history of hospitalization, self-reported health status, polypharmacy, weight loss, mood, incontinence, sensory problems, and timed up and go test. In mKFI, timed up and go test was replaced with a question whether a person can walk around a schoolyard. Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty scale was used as a gold standard. Results: In study population (mean age, 76; 47.6% men), score of the KFI correlated with the CHS scale. The KFI correlated with common geriatric parameters including Activities of Daily Living, nutritional status, cognitive performance, and mood. As a construct validity, items of KFI correlated with CHS scale. As a criterion validity, sensitivity was 81.6%, specificity was 67.0% to predict frailty by CHS scale with the score of 3 or higher in KFI. The KFI and mKFI correlated with each other (R2 = 0.88), and prediction ability for frailty by CHS scale was not significantly differed between KFI and mKFI. Conclusions: The KFI and mKFI are valid instruments for frailty screening and might be useful as simple frailty screening tools to identify older adults who might benefit from comprehensive geriatric assessment and integrated, multidisciplinary geriatric care services.
Abstract
Background/Aims: We aimed to assess validity of the Korean Frailty Index (KFI) and the modified KFI (mKFI) in nationwide Korean population as screening measures for frailty status in older adults. Methods: Analysis was performed in the records of baseline assessments of 2,886 participants in the Korean Frailty Aging Cohort study from 2016 to 2017. The KFI included eight items on a history of hospitalization, self-reported health status, polypharmacy, weight loss, mood, incontinence, sensory problems, and timed up and go test. In mKFI, timed up and go test was replaced with a question whether a person can walk around a schoolyard. Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty scale was used as a gold standard. Results: In study population (mean age, 76; 47.6% men), score of the KFI correlated with the CHS scale. The KFI correlated with common geriatric parameters including Activities of Daily Living, nutritional status, cognitive performance, and mood. As a construct validity, items of KFI correlated with CHS scale. As a criterion validity, sensitivity was 81.6%, specificity was 67.0% to predict frailty by CHS scale with the score of 3 or higher in KFI. The KFI and mKFI correlated with each other (R2 = 0.88), and prediction ability for frailty by CHS scale was not significantly differed between KFI and mKFI. Conclusions: The KFI and mKFI are valid instruments for frailty screening and might be useful as simple frailty screening tools to identify older adults who might benefit from comprehensive geriatric assessment and integrated, multidisciplinary geriatric care services.
참고문헌 (30)
- Clegg A, "Frailty in elderly people", Lancet, 381, pp.752~762 (2013)
- 정희원, "Prevalence of Frailty and Aging-Related Health Conditions in Older Koreans in Rural Communities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(3), pp.345~352 (2016), 대한의학회
- Jung HW, "Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population : comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models", PLoS One, 9, pp.e87958~ (2014)
- Song X, "Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation", J Am Geriatr Soc, 58, pp.681~687 (2010)
- Rockwood K, "A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people", CMAJ, 173, pp.489~495 (2005)
- Jung HW, "Usual gait speed is associated with frailty status, institutionalization, and mortality in community-dwelling rural older adults : a longitudinal analysis of the Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area", Clin Interv Aging, 13, pp.1079~1089 (2018)
- Matteo Cesari, "Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Development of a Framework for Supporting Interventions Against Incident Mobility Disability", Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 21(2), pp.42~48 (2017), 대한노인병학회[DOI]
- Afilalo J, "Frailty scales in transcatheter aortic valve replacement : incremental body of evidence", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 11, pp.1537~1538 (2018)
- Ruiz J, "Frailty assessment predicts toxicity during first cycle chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer regardless of chronologic age", J Geriatr Oncol, 10, pp.48~54 (2019)
- Kim SW, "Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk", JAMA Surg, 149, pp.633~640 (2014)
- Dent E, "Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice : a review", Eur J Intern Med, 31, pp.3~10 (2016)
- Fried LP, "Frailty in older adults : evidence for a phenotype", J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 56, pp.M146~M156 (2001)
- Searle SD, "A standard procedure for creating a frailty index", BMC Geriatr, 8, pp.24~ (2008)
- Mitnitski AB, "Frailty, fitness and late-life mortality in relation to chronological and biological age", BMC Geriatr, 2, pp.1~ (2002)
- Goggins WB, "Frailty index as a measure of biological age in a Chinese population", J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 60, pp.1046~1051 (2005)
- 황환식, "한국형 노쇠측정도구 개발 및 타당도 조사", Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 14(4), pp.191~202 (2010), 대한노인병학회
- 원장원, "Starting Construction of Frailty Cohort for Elderly and Intervention Study", Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 20(3), pp.114~117 (2016), 대한노인병학회[DOI]
- Chen LK, "Sarcopenia in Asia : consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia", J Am Med Dir Assoc, 15, pp.95~101 (2014)
- Orme JG, "Factorial and discriminant validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression(CES-D)scale", J Clin Psychol, 42, pp.28~33 (1986)
- Jeon SY, "Physical frailty predicts cognitive decline in elderly people : prospective findings from the living profiles of older people survey in Korea", Korean J Fam Pract, 5(Suppl 3), pp.S702~S707 (2015)
- Guralnik JM, "Lower extremity function and subsequent disability : consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery", J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 55, pp.M221~M231 (2000)
- Won CW, "The development of Korean Activities of Daily Living(K-ADL)and Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living(K-IADL)scale", J Korean Geriatr Soc, 6, pp.107~120 (2002)
- Kang Y, "A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination(K-MMSE)in dementia patients", J Korean Neurol Assoc, 15, pp.300~308 (1997)
- Kim KI, "Impaired health-related quality of life in elderly women is associated with multimorbidity : results from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey", Gend Med, 9, pp.309~318 (2012)
- Jung IK, "A study of standardization of Korean Form of Geriatric Depression Scale(KGDS)", J Korean Geriatr Psychiatry, 1, pp.61~72 (1997)
- Vellas B, "The Mini Nutritional Assessment(MNA)and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients", Nutrition, 15, pp.116~122 (1999)
- 정희원, "The Korean version of the FRAIL scale: clinical feasibility and validity of assessing the frailty status of Korean elderly", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 31(3), pp.594~600 (2016), 대한내과학회
- Jang IY, "Korean version of the fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses and loss of weight questionnaire versus the modified kihon checklist for frailty screening in community-dwelling older adults : the aging study of PyeongChang rural area", Geriatr Gerontol Int, 17, pp.2046~2052 (2017)
- 정휘수, "한국형 노쇠측정도구로 평가된 노쇠와 관련된 임상적 요인들", Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 17(2), pp.71~78 (2013), 대한노인병학회[DOI]
- Kim DH, "Evaluation of changes in functional status in the year after aortic valve replacement", JAMA Intern Med, 179, pp.383~391 (2019)