Risk stratification of patients with gastric lesions indefinite for dysplasia
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: There are no def inite guidelines for the management of gastric lesions diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia (IND) by endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of gastric IND and predictive factors for gastric neoplasm. Methods: This study included 457 patients with a first diagnosis of gastric IND by EFB between January 2005 and December 2013. Patient characteristics and endoscopic and pathological data were reviewed and compared. Results: Of the 457 gastric IND patients, 128 (28%) were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma, 21 (4.6%) with high-grade dysplasia, 31 (6.8%) with low-grade dysplasia, and 277 (60.6%) as negative for dysplasia. Of lesions observed, 180 (39.4%) showed upgraded histology. Multivariate analysis revealed that surface erythema (odds ratio [OR], 2.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.741 to 4.516), spontaneous bleeding (OR, 2.618; 95% CI, 1.298 to 5.279), lesion size ≥ 1 cm (OR, 5.762; 95% CI, 3.459 to 9.597), and depressed morphology (OR, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.155 to 4.124) were significant risk factors for high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. The ORs associated with 2 and ≥ 3 risk factors were 7.131 and 34.86, respectively. Conclusions: Precautions should be taken in the management of gastric IND patients, especially when risk factors, including surface erythema, spontaneous bleeding, lesion size ≥ 1 cm, and depressed morphology are present. Considering the combined effect of the presence of multiple risk factors on the incidence of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, endoscopic resection should be recommended if a gastric IND patient has at two or more of these factors.
Abstract
Background/Aims: There are no def inite guidelines for the management of gastric lesions diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia (IND) by endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of gastric IND and predictive factors for gastric neoplasm. Methods: This study included 457 patients with a first diagnosis of gastric IND by EFB between January 2005 and December 2013. Patient characteristics and endoscopic and pathological data were reviewed and compared. Results: Of the 457 gastric IND patients, 128 (28%) were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma, 21 (4.6%) with high-grade dysplasia, 31 (6.8%) with low-grade dysplasia, and 277 (60.6%) as negative for dysplasia. Of lesions observed, 180 (39.4%) showed upgraded histology. Multivariate analysis revealed that surface erythema (odds ratio [OR], 2.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.741 to 4.516), spontaneous bleeding (OR, 2.618; 95% CI, 1.298 to 5.279), lesion size ≥ 1 cm (OR, 5.762; 95% CI, 3.459 to 9.597), and depressed morphology (OR, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.155 to 4.124) were significant risk factors for high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. The ORs associated with 2 and ≥ 3 risk factors were 7.131 and 34.86, respectively. Conclusions: Precautions should be taken in the management of gastric IND patients, especially when risk factors, including surface erythema, spontaneous bleeding, lesion size ≥ 1 cm, and depressed morphology are present. Considering the combined effect of the presence of multiple risk factors on the incidence of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, endoscopic resection should be recommended if a gastric IND patient has at two or more of these factors.
참고문헌 (23)
- Correa P, "A human model of gastric carcinogenesis", Cancer Res, 48, pp.3554~3560 (1988)
- Lauwers GY, "Gastric epithelial dysplasia", Gut, 45, pp.784~790 (1999)
- Dixon MF, "Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia : Vienna revisited", Gut, 51, pp.130~131 (2002)
- Lee CK, "Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia?", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 25, pp.1507~1513 (2010)
- Kim YJ, "Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions", Endoscopy, 42, pp.620~626 (2010)
- Cho SJ, "Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia : an analysis using the Vienna classification", Endoscopy, 43, pp.465~471 (2011)
- Riddell RH, "Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease : standardized classification with provisional clinical applications", Hum Pathol, 14, pp.931~968 (1983)
- Yu CH, "Endoscopic resection as a first therapy for gastric epithelial atypia: is it reasonable?", Dig Dis Sci, 59, pp.3012~3020 (2014)
- Kim SI, "What is the next step for gastric atypical epithelium on histological findings of endoscopic forceps biopsy?", Dig Liver Dis, 45, pp.573~577 (2013)
- Rugge M, "Gastric dysplasia : the Padova international classification", Am J Surg Pathol, 24, pp.167~176 (2000)
- "The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30to December 1, 2002", Gastrointest Endosc, 58, pp.S3~S43 (2003)
- Kim MK, "Is lesion size an independent indication for endoscopic resection of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia?", Dig Dis Sci, 59, pp.428~435 (2014)
- Schlemper RJ, "The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia", Gut, 47, pp.251~255 (2000)
- Sinh P, "Clinical outcomes in patients with a diagnosis of"indefinite for dysplasia"in Barrett’s esophagus : a multicenter cohort study", Endoscopy, 47, pp.669~674 (2015)
- Goo JJ, "Risk factors associated with diagnostic discrepancy of gastric indefinite neoplasia: who need en bloc resection?", Surg Endosc, 29, pp.3761~3767 (2015)
- Tava F, "Type or extension of intestinal metaplasia and immature", atypical"indefinite-for-dysplasia"lesions as predictors of gastric neoplasia, 2006, pp.37, 1489~1497
- Lal N, "Optimal number of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the oesophagus", Gut, 33, pp.724~726 (1992)
- Soetikno R, "Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract", J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.4490~4498 (2005)
- Yalamarthi S, "Missed diagnoses in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers", Endoscopy, 36, pp.874~879 (2004)
- Cho YS, "Risk factors of developing interval early gastric cancer after negative endoscopy", Dig Dis Sci, 60, pp.936~943 (2015)
- ASGE Technology Committee, "Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.11~18 (2008)
- Kojima T, "Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer : review of the Japanese literature", Gastrointest Endosc, 48, pp.550~554 (1998)
- Chung IK, "Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms : Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 69, pp.1228~1235 (2009)