본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

뇌졸중 환자에서 반복 경두개 자기자극이 편측 공간무시에 미치는 효과

Comparison of Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with High- or Low-frequency on Visuospatial Neglect in Stroke Patients

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective: To compare the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the right or left parietal cortex with high- or low-frequency on visuospatial neglect in stroke patients. Method: Nineteen stroke subjects (10 males, 9 females) were enrolled. All subjects received 1,200 real rTMS over left parietal cortex at an intensity of 90% of motor thresholds with 1 Hz, sham rTMS over right parietal cortex with 20 Hz and real rTMS over right parietal cortex at same intensity with 20 Hz under randomized cross over design. To compare the effects of different rTMS protocols, letter cancellation test, line bisection test (near, far) and Ota’s task were administered before and after rTMS. Results: Low frequency rTMS over left parietal cortex, compared with sham stimulation, significantly improve visuospatial neglect in Ota’s task (p<0.05). Conclusion: As low frequency rTMS over left parietal cortex showed beneficial effects on visuospatial neglect, low frequency rTMS can be used as a treatment modality for patients suffering from visuospatial neglect after stroke. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2010; 34: 397-402)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the right or left parietal cortex with high- or low-frequency on visuospatial neglect in stroke patients. Method: Nineteen stroke subjects (10 males, 9 females) were enrolled. All subjects received 1,200 real rTMS over left parietal cortex at an intensity of 90% of motor thresholds with 1 Hz, sham rTMS over right parietal cortex with 20 Hz and real rTMS over right parietal cortex at same intensity with 20 Hz under randomized cross over design. To compare the effects of different rTMS protocols, letter cancellation test, line bisection test (near, far) and Ota’s task were administered before and after rTMS. Results: Low frequency rTMS over left parietal cortex, compared with sham stimulation, significantly improve visuospatial neglect in Ota’s task (p<0.05). Conclusion: As low frequency rTMS over left parietal cortex showed beneficial effects on visuospatial neglect, low frequency rTMS can be used as a treatment modality for patients suffering from visuospatial neglect after stroke. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2010; 34: 397-402)

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Heilman KM, "Neglect and related disorders", Semin Neurol, 20, pp.463~470 (2000)
  2. Pizzamiglio L, "Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage", J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 14, pp.901~923 (1992)
  3. Julkunen L, "Rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke visual field defect with computer-assisted training: a clinical and neurophysiological study", Restor Neurol Neurosci, 21, pp.19~28 (2003)
  4. Rubens AB, "Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect", Neurology, 35, pp.1019~1024 (1985)
  5. Frassinetti F, "Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation", Brain, 125, pp.608~623 (2002)
  6. Kinsbourne M, "Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry", Adv Neurol, 18, pp.41~49 (1977)
  7. Pascual-Leone A, "Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroplasticity", Neuropsychologia, 37, pp.207~217 (1999)
  8. Berardelli A, "Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man", Exp Brain Res, 122, pp.79~84 (1998)
  9. Pascual-Leone A, "Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation", J Clin Neurophysiol, 15, pp.333~343 (1998)
  10. Brighina F, "1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans", Neurosci Lett, 336, pp.131~133 (2003)
  11. Kim YH, "Facilitating visuospatial attention for the contralateral hemifield by repetitive TMS on the posterior parietal cortex", Neurosci Lett, 382, pp.280~282 (2005)
  12. Ota H, "Dissociation of body-centered and stimulus-centered representations in unilateral neglect", Neurology, 57, pp.2064~2069 (2001)
  13. Kleinman JT, "Right hemispatial neglect: frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke", Brain Cogn, 64, pp.50~59 (2007)
  14. Damasio AR, "Neglect following damage to the frontal lobe or basal ganglia", Neuropsychologia, 18, pp.123~132 (1980)
  15. Heilman KM, "Frontal lobe neglect in man", Neurology, 22, pp.660~664 (1972)
  16. Kim YH, "The large-scale neural network for spatial attention displays multifunctional overlap but differential asymmetry", Neuroimage, 9, pp.269~277 (1999)
  17. Watson RT, "Thalamic neglect. Possible role of the medial thalamus and nucleus reticularis in behavior", Arch Neurol, 38, pp.501~506 (1981)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of Combined Therapy of Robot and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Hemispatial Neglect in Stroke Patients김상범, 박진기, 이경우, 이숙정, 이정복, 이종화대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제6호고빈도 반복 경두부 자기자극이 뇌졸중의 운동 기능에 미치는 영향김봉옥, 김성겸, 손민균, 최필순, 황선홍대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2010 · 제34권 제2호반복 경두개 자기자극 후 상지운동이 편마비 상지 기능 회복에 미치는 영향강성진, 류병주, 박시운, 이지연, 최경인, 최은석대한근전도전기진단의학회 · 대한근전도 전기진단의학회지2010 · 제12권 제1호Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-stroke Patients with Severe Upper-Limb Motor Impairment김덕용, 김주선, 정강재, 홍준택, Hyunjung Kim, Kim Dae Hyun대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2020 · 제13권 제1호The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neglect Syndrome in Stroke Patients이유경, Dae Yul Kim, Eun Jung Sung, Kyung Hee Do, Min Ho Chun, Yong Gyu Kwon대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2016 · 제40권 제2호Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Functional Recovery Following Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients김서영, 김태욱, 신성봉, 이성재, 현정근대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2016 · 제40권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)