본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Endoscopic mucosal resection using anchored snare Tip-in versus precut technique for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: Small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be treated with modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, an optimal EMR method remains to be established. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Tip-in EMR versus precut EMR (EMR-P) for treating rectal NETs. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with rectal NETs of < 10 mm in diameInter. The patients were randomly assigned to EMR-P and Tip-in EMR groups in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcome was margin-negative (R0) resection rate between the two methods, with a noninferiority margin of 10%. Results: Seventy-five NETs in 73 patients, including 64 eligible lesions (32 lesions in each, EMR-P and Tip-in EMR groups), were evaluated. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, R0 resection rates of the EMR-P and Tip-in EMR groups were 96.9% and 90.6%, respectively, which did not demonstrate non-inferiority (risk difference, -6.3 [95% confidence interval: -18.0 to 5.5]). Resection time in the EMR-P group was longer than that in the Tip-in EMR group (p < 0.001). One case of intraprocedural bleeding was reported in each group. Conclusions: We did not demonstrate the non-inferiority of Tip-in EMR compared to EMR-P for treating small rectal NETs. However, the R0 resection rates for both techniques were high enough for clinical application.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be treated with modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, an optimal EMR method remains to be established. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Tip-in EMR versus precut EMR (EMR-P) for treating rectal NETs. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with rectal NETs of < 10 mm in diameInter. The patients were randomly assigned to EMR-P and Tip-in EMR groups in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcome was margin-negative (R0) resection rate between the two methods, with a noninferiority margin of 10%. Results: Seventy-five NETs in 73 patients, including 64 eligible lesions (32 lesions in each, EMR-P and Tip-in EMR groups), were evaluated. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, R0 resection rates of the EMR-P and Tip-in EMR groups were 96.9% and 90.6%, respectively, which did not demonstrate non-inferiority (risk difference, -6.3 [95% confidence interval: -18.0 to 5.5]). Resection time in the EMR-P group was longer than that in the Tip-in EMR group (p < 0.001). One case of intraprocedural bleeding was reported in each group. Conclusions: We did not demonstrate the non-inferiority of Tip-in EMR compared to EMR-P for treating small rectal NETs. However, the R0 resection rates for both techniques were high enough for clinical application.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Gordon JI, "Differentiation and self-renewal in the mouse gastrointestinal epithelium", Curr Opin Cell Biol, 6, pp.795~803 (1994)
  2. Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of Korean Society of Pathologists, "Current trends of the incidence and pathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(GEP-NETs)in Korea 2000-2009 : multicenter study", Cancer Res Treat, 44, pp.157~165 (2012)
  3. Tsai HJ, "The epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumors in Taiwan : a nation-wide cancer registry-based study", PLoS One, 8, pp.e62487~ (2013)
  4. Fraenkel M, "Incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours : a systematic review of the literature", Endocr Relat Cancer, 21, pp.R153~R163 (2014)
  5. Leoncini E, "Increased incidence trend of low-grade and high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms", Endocrine, 58, pp.368~379 (2017)
  6. Xu Z, "Epidemiologic trends of and factors associated with overall survival for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States", JAMA Netw Open, 4, pp.e2124750~ (2021)
  7. de Mestier L, "Updating the management of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Endoscopy, 45, pp.1039~1046 (2013)
  8. Son J, "Oncological outcomes according to the treatment modality based on the size of rectal neuroendocrine tumors : a single-center retrospective study", Surg Endosc, 36, pp.2445~2455 (2022)
  9. Zhou X, "Endoscopic resection therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.259~268 (2014)
  10. Park HW, "Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.143~149 (2010)
  11. Ono A, "Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device", Gastrointest Endosc, 57, pp.583~587 (2003)
  12. Moon JH, "Endoscopic submucosal resection with double ligation technique for treatment of small rectal carcinoid tumors", Endoscopy, 38, pp.511~514 (2006)
  13. Kim JS, "Usefulness of endoscopic resection using the band ligation method for rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Intest Res, 14, pp.164~171 (2016)
  14. Yang DH, "Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors : comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection(with videos)", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.1015~1022 (2016)
  15. So H, "Efficacy of precut endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Clin Endosc, 50, pp.585~591 (2017)
  16. Huang J, "Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumours", World J Surg Oncol, 12, pp.23~ (2014)
  17. Cheung DY, "Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum", Surg Endosc, 29, pp.1500~1505 (2015)
  18. Lee HJ, "A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors", Surg Endosc, 30, pp.3491~3498 (2016)
  19. Lee HS, "Comparison of conventional and modified endoscopic mucosal resection methods for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Surg Endosc, 35, pp.6055~6065 (2021)
  20. Hong JY, "Risk factors for procedure-related complications after endoscopic resection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors", Medicine(Baltimore), 97, pp.e12589~ (2018)
  21. Chien H, "Tip-in EMR for R0 resection for a large flat colonic tumor", Gastrointest Endosc, 84, pp.743~ (2016)
  22. Forté E, "Anchoring the snare tip using a small incision in the submucosa facilitates en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection for sporadic duodenal adenomas", Endoscopy, 49, pp.1276~1277 (2017)
  23. Jacques J, "Anchoring the snare tip by means of a small incision facilitates en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection and increases the specimen size", Endoscopy, 49(S 01), pp.E39~E41 (2017)
  24. Pioche M, "Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip : multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety", Endosc Int Open, 7, pp.E1496~E1502 (2019)
  25. Noh SM, "Tip-in versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for flat colorectal neoplasia 10mm or larger in size", Int J Colorectal Dis, 35, pp.1283~1290 (2020)
  26. Imai K, "Tip-in Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 15-to 25-mm Colorectal Adenomas : A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial(STAR Trial)", Am J Gastroenterol, 116, pp.1398~1405 (2021)
  27. Kim J, "Anchoring the snare tip is a feasible endoscopic mucosal resection method for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Sci Rep, 11, pp.12918~ (2021)
  28. Zhang HP, "Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm : a meta-analysis", Scand J Gastroenterol, 51, pp.1345~1353 (2016)
  29. Kim HH, "Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for removing small rectal carcinoid tumor compared with endoscopic mucosal resection : analysis of 100 cases", Dig Endosc, 24, pp.159~163 (2012)
  30. Ebi M, "Endoscopic submucosal resection with an endoscopic variceal ligation device for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Int J Colorectal Dis, 33, pp.1703~1708 (2018)
  31. Kamigaichi Y, "Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors : advantages of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device compared to conventional EMR and ESD", DEN Open, 2, pp.e35~ (2021)
  32. Park SS, "Comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors(with videos)", Gastrointest Endosc, 91, pp.1164~1171 (2020)
  33. Coutinho LMA, "Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors", Arq Gastroenterol, 58, pp.210~213 (2021)
  34. Shi H, "Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors(with videos) : a single center retrospective study", BMC Gastroenterol, 22, pp.276~ (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors김광운, 변정식, 서명숙, 소훈섭, 양동훈, 유수현, 한승봉, 황성욱대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2017 · 제50권 제6호Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?Dong Hoon Baek, Seung Min Hong대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2022 · 제55권 제4호Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection Therapies for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: A Meta-AnalysisHe-Sheng Luo, Lei He, Tao Deng연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2015 · 제56권 제1호Effcacy and Safety of Complete Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Neoplasia Using a Stepwise Endoscopic Protocol with SOUTEN, a Novel Multifunctional SnareMarina Kubo, Mio Matsumoto, Shinji Yoshii, Takefumi Kikuchi, Yasunari Takakuwa대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2020 · 제53권 제2호Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Comparision of Polypectomy and Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation김보미, 김지현, 김형훈, 박선자, 설상영, 옥경선, 이상헌, 지삼룡대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2015 · 제48권 제1호Long-term outcome of grade 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumor ≤1 cm after incomplete endoscopic resectionBumhee Park, Choong-Kyun Noh, Gil Ho Lee, Hye Lynn Jeon, Jong Hoon Park, Jong Sun Park, Kee Myung Lee, Sung Jae Shin, Sun Gyo Lim대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2025 · 제58권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)