Analysis of Publication Status of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To analyze publication rate, time to publication and the characteristics of the abstracts presented at the annual Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (KARM) meetings.Methods A total of 1,027 abstracts presented at the 2008 and 2009 annual KARM meetings were enrolled in the database and searched for their subsequent citation in PubMed, KoreaMed, and Google Scholar.Results The data analysis revealed that 317 (30.87%) abstracts, were published as full-length journal articles and publication rates by subject were not significantly different. The mean time to publication was 17.17±10.48 months, and the journals written in English (20.39±10.20) required a longer duration than those written in Korean (11.94±8.44) with statistical significance (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference (p=0.284) in the duration between domestic (17.61±10.37) and foreign (16.48±10.51) of the 220 domestic journal articles, 190 (86.76%) were published in the Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine and the 97 articles published in foreign journals were scattered over 60 different journals.Conclusion The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2008 and 2009 annual KARM meetings was 30.87% and the mean time to publication was 17.17±10.48 months.
Abstract
Objective To analyze publication rate, time to publication and the characteristics of the abstracts presented at the annual Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (KARM) meetings.Methods A total of 1,027 abstracts presented at the 2008 and 2009 annual KARM meetings were enrolled in the database and searched for their subsequent citation in PubMed, KoreaMed, and Google Scholar.Results The data analysis revealed that 317 (30.87%) abstracts, were published as full-length journal articles and publication rates by subject were not significantly different. The mean time to publication was 17.17±10.48 months, and the journals written in English (20.39±10.20) required a longer duration than those written in Korean (11.94±8.44) with statistical significance (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference (p=0.284) in the duration between domestic (17.61±10.37) and foreign (16.48±10.51) of the 220 domestic journal articles, 190 (86.76%) were published in the Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine and the 97 articles published in foreign journals were scattered over 60 different journals.Conclusion The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2008 and 2009 annual KARM meetings was 30.87% and the mean time to publication was 17.17±10.48 months.
참고문헌 (15)
- Scherer RW., "Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2), pp.MR000005~ (2007)
- Scherer RW., "Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts : a metaanalysis", JAMA, 272, pp.158~162 (1994)
- Gorman RL., "Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings : a measure of quality?", Vet Hum Toxicol, 32, pp.470~472 (1990)
- Castillo J., "Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting", Eur J Anaesthesiol, 19, pp.888~893 (2002)
- Saha S., "Impact factor : a valid measure of journal quality?", J Med Libr Assoc, 91, pp.42~46 (2003)
- 정재훈, "Fate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Korean Urological Association", Korean Journal of Urology, 53(4), pp.280~284 (2012), 대한비뇨기과학회[DOI]
- Yun EH., "Fate of Abstracts presented at the scientific meetings of the Korean radiological society", J Korean Radiol Soc, 41, pp.1029~1034 (1999)
- Kyu Jin Chung, "How Many Presentations Are Published as Full Papers?", Archives of Plastic Surgery, 39(3), pp.238~243 (2012), 대한성형외과학회[DOI]
- 김주오, "대한척추외과학회에서 구연된 논문에 대한 추적 관찰", 대한척추외과학회지, 18(1), pp.19~23 (2011), 대한척추외과학회
- 하태호, "Publication Rates for Abstracts Presented by Korean Investigators at Major Radiology Meetings", Korean Journal of Radiology, 9(4), pp.303~311 (2008), 대한영상의학회
- Dickersin K., "Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards", JAMA, 267, pp.374~378 (1992)
- Govender P., "Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?", JBR-BTR, 91, pp.231~234 (2008)
- Autorino R., "Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology : are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals?", J Endourol, 20, pp.996~1001 (2006)
- Smith WA., "Factors associated with the full publication of studies presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association", J Urol, 177, pp.1084~1088 (2007)
- Gill S., "Obstacles to residents’ conducting research and predictors of publication", Acad Med, 76, pp.477~ (2001)