Outcomes according to treatment modalities as a bridge to curative surgery for malignant obstruction of the proximal colon: stent versus stoma
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The optimal treatment for acute malignant obstruction of the proximal colon (MOPC, proximal to the splenic flexure) remains challenging. Emergency resection, the traditional modality for MOPC, has shown significantly high mortality and morbidity rates, according to recent studies. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of stent vs stoma as a bridge to curative surgery for MOPC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 72 patients who underwent endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) or loop ileostomy for MOPC at six referral centers between January 2011 and July 2021. Clinical and pathological characteristics, procedure-related complications, and long-term mortality rates after curative surgery were analyzed. Results: During a mean follow-up period of 32 months, 30 patients (41.7%) underwent ileostomy preferentially for more proximal cancer, complete obstruction, and advanced tumor stage compared to the SEMS group. No difference was found in procedure-related complications, but five deaths were observed after ileostomy. Survival analysis for 5-year mortality after curative surgery showed no significant difference between the bridge modalities (log-rank p = 0.253). Conclusions: In this study, SEMS as a bridge to surgery showed relatively safe results in terms of post-procedural mortality. However, these results should be considered when performing ileostomy in patients with more advanced malignant obstruction.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The optimal treatment for acute malignant obstruction of the proximal colon (MOPC, proximal to the splenic flexure) remains challenging. Emergency resection, the traditional modality for MOPC, has shown significantly high mortality and morbidity rates, according to recent studies. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of stent vs stoma as a bridge to curative surgery for MOPC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 72 patients who underwent endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) or loop ileostomy for MOPC at six referral centers between January 2011 and July 2021. Clinical and pathological characteristics, procedure-related complications, and long-term mortality rates after curative surgery were analyzed. Results: During a mean follow-up period of 32 months, 30 patients (41.7%) underwent ileostomy preferentially for more proximal cancer, complete obstruction, and advanced tumor stage compared to the SEMS group. No difference was found in procedure-related complications, but five deaths were observed after ileostomy. Survival analysis for 5-year mortality after curative surgery showed no significant difference between the bridge modalities (log-rank p = 0.253). Conclusions: In this study, SEMS as a bridge to surgery showed relatively safe results in terms of post-procedural mortality. However, these results should be considered when performing ileostomy in patients with more advanced malignant obstruction.
참고문헌 (23)
- Cheynel N, "Trends in frequency and management of obstructing colorectal cancers in a well-defined population", Dis Colon Rectum, 50, pp.1568~1575 (2007)
- Smothers L, "Emergency surgery for colon carcinoma", Dis Colon Rectum, 46, pp.24~30 (2003)
- Amelung FJ, "Emergency resection versus bridge to surgery with stenting in patients with acute right-sided colonic obstruction : a systematic review focusing on mortality and morbidity rates", Int J Colorectal Dis, 30, pp.1147~1155 (2015)
- Hsu TC, "Comparison of one-stage resection and anastomosis of acute complete obstruction of left and right colon", Am J Surg, 189, pp.384~387 (2005)
- Sjo OH, "Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer", Colorectal Dis, 11, pp.733~739 (2009)
- Kobayashi H, "Risk model for right hemicolectomy based on 19, 070 Japanese patients in the National Clinical Database", J Gastroenterol, 49, pp.1047~1055 (2014)
- Amelung FJ, "A population-based analysis of three treatment modalities for malignant obstruction of the proximal colon : acute resection versus stent or stoma as a bridge to surgery", Ann Surg Oncol, 23, pp.3660~3668 (2016)
- Jung WB, "Comparison of short-term outcome between diverting colostomy and colonic stent as a bridge to surgery for left colonic malignant obstruction", Medicine(Baltimore), 99, pp.e19557~ (2020)
- Repici A, "Stenting of the proximal colon in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction : techniques and outcomes", Gastrointest Endosc, 66, pp.940~944 (2007)
- Yoon JY, "Clinical outcomes and risk factors for technical and clinical failures of self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction", Gastrointest Endosc, 74, pp.858~868 (2011)
- van Hooft JE, "Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline : update 2020", Endoscopy, 52, pp.389~407 (2020)
- Sebastian S, "Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stenting in malignant colorectal obstruction", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.2051~2057 (2004)
- Almadi MA, "Complications and survival in patients undergoing colonic stenting for malignant obstruction", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.7138~7145 (2013)
- Kim SJ, "Colonic perforation either during or after stent insertion as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction increases the risk of peritoneal seeding", Surg Endosc, 29, pp.3499~3506 (2015)
- 조유경, "Clinical Outcome of Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement in the Management of Malignant Proximal Colon Obstruction", Gut and Liver, 5(2), pp.165~170 (2011), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Baron TH, "Expandable metal stents for the treatment of colonic obstruction : techniques and outcomes", Gastrointest Endosc, 47, pp.277~286 (1998)
- Rajaretnam N, "StatPearls" (2022), StatPearls Publishing
- van Hooft JE, "Early closure of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgery for stage IV left-sided colorectal cancer", Endoscopy, 40, pp.184~191 (2008)
- van Hooft JE, "Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction : a multicentre randomised trial", Lancet Oncol, 12, pp.344~352 (2011)
- Pirlet IA, "Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction : a multicenter randomized controlled trial", Surg Endosc, 25, pp.1814~1821 (2011)
- Amelung FJ, "Critical appraisal of oncological safety of stent as bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructing colon cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 131, pp.66~75 (2018)
- Arezzo A, "Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colonic obstruction : results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial(ESCO trial)", Surg Endosc, 31, pp.3297~3305 (2017)
- Arezzo A, "Long-term oncologic results after stenting as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction : a multicenter randomized controlled trial(ESCO Trial)", Ann Surg, 272, pp.703~708 (2020)