본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Correlations Between Electrically Quantified Pain Degree, Subjectively Assessed Visual Analogue Scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To evaluate the clinical utility of the electrically calculated quantitative pain degree (QPD) and to correlate it with subjective assessments of pain degree including a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ).Methods We recruited 25 patients with low back pain. Of them, 21 patients suffered from low back pain for more than 3 months. The QPD was calculated using the PainVision (PV, PS-2100; Nipro Co., Osaka, Japan). We applied electrodes to the medial forearm of the subjects and the electrical stimulus was amplified sequentially. Minimum perceived current (MPC) and pain equivalent current (PEC) were defined as minimum electrical stimulation that could be sensed by the subject and electrical stimulation that could trigger actual pain itself. To eliminate individual differences, we defined QPD as the following: QPD=PEC−MPC/MPC. We scored pre-treatment QPD three times at admission and post-treatment QPD once at discharge. The VAS, MPQ, and QPD were evaluated and correlations between the scales were analyzed.Results Result showed significant test-retest reliability (ICC=0.967, p<0.001) and the correlation between QDP and MPQ was significant (at admission SRCC=0.619 and p=0.001; at discharge SRCC=0.628, p=0.001). However, the correlation between QPD and VAS was not significant (at admission SRCC=0.240, p=0.248; at discharge SRCC=0.289, p=0.161).Conclusion Numerical values measured with PV showed consistent results with repeated calculations. Electrically measured QPD showed an excellent correlation with MPQ but not with VAS. These results demonstrate that PV is a significantly reliable device for quantifying the intensity of low back pain.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical utility of the electrically calculated quantitative pain degree (QPD) and to correlate it with subjective assessments of pain degree including a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ).Methods We recruited 25 patients with low back pain. Of them, 21 patients suffered from low back pain for more than 3 months. The QPD was calculated using the PainVision (PV, PS-2100; Nipro Co., Osaka, Japan). We applied electrodes to the medial forearm of the subjects and the electrical stimulus was amplified sequentially. Minimum perceived current (MPC) and pain equivalent current (PEC) were defined as minimum electrical stimulation that could be sensed by the subject and electrical stimulation that could trigger actual pain itself. To eliminate individual differences, we defined QPD as the following: QPD=PEC−MPC/MPC. We scored pre-treatment QPD three times at admission and post-treatment QPD once at discharge. The VAS, MPQ, and QPD were evaluated and correlations between the scales were analyzed.Results Result showed significant test-retest reliability (ICC=0.967, p<0.001) and the correlation between QDP and MPQ was significant (at admission SRCC=0.619 and p=0.001; at discharge SRCC=0.628, p=0.001). However, the correlation between QPD and VAS was not significant (at admission SRCC=0.240, p=0.248; at discharge SRCC=0.289, p=0.161).Conclusion Numerical values measured with PV showed consistent results with repeated calculations. Electrically measured QPD showed an excellent correlation with MPQ but not with VAS. These results demonstrate that PV is a significantly reliable device for quantifying the intensity of low back pain.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Elliott AM, "The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community", Lancet, 354, pp.1248~1252 (1999)
  2. Verhaak PF, "Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: a review of the literature", Pain, 77, pp.231~239 (1998)
  3. Litcher-Kelly L, "A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials", J Pain, 8, pp.906~913 (2007)
  4. Gatchel RJ, "Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: the biopsychosocial perspective", Am Psychol, 59, pp.795~805 (2004)
  5. McCormack HM, "Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review", Psychol Med, 18, pp.1007~1019 (1988)
  6. Melzack R, "Textbook of pain", pp.129~164 (1999), Churchill Livingston
  7. Melzack R, "The short-form McGill pain questionnaire", Pain, 30, pp.191~197 (1987)
  8. Wewers ME, "A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena", Res Nurs Health, 13, pp.227~236 (1990)
  9. Katz J, "Measurement of pain", Surg Clin North Am, 79, pp.231~252 (1999)
  10. Kato J, "PainVision", Masui, 60, pp.1059~1063 (2011)
  11. Fukada T, "A randomised doubleblind crossover trial of the potential analgesic effect of a transdermal nicotine patch in non-smokers based on objective and subjective assessment", Eur J Anaesthesiol, 28, pp.592~596 (2011)
  12. Kanai A, "Change of the affected skin temperature in the sub-acute stage predicts the pain intensity and disability in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia", Proceedings of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 2012 Annual Meeting (2012)
  13. Maekawa N, "Can we revaluate pain with PainVision, a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain? A feasibility study of pain in herpes zoster patients", J Jpn Soc Clin Anesth, 29, pp.824~828 (2009)
  14. Collins WR Jr, "Relation of peripheral nerve fiber size and sensation in man", Arch Neurol, 3, pp.381~385 (1960)
  15. Lerner TH, "Quantitative sensory nerve conduction threshold (sNCT) evaluation of the trigeminal nerve at the mental foramen area", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.103~107 (2000)
  16. Jensen MP, "The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods", Pain, 27, pp.117~126 (1986)
  17. Hicks CL, "The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement", Pain, 93, pp.173~183 (2001)
  18. Ho K, "Review of pain-measurement tools", Ann Emerg Med, 27, pp.427~432 (1996)
  19. Melzack R, "The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement", Anesthesiology, 103, pp.199~202 (2005)
  20. Gracely RH, "Evaluation of multi-dimensional pain scales", Pain, 48, pp.297~300 (1992)
  21. Matsumura H, "Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using ‘the PainVisionTM system’ for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects", Int Wound J, 9, pp.451~455 (2012)
  22. Bonica JJ, "Domenowske M. The management of pain" (1990), Lea & Febiger
  23. Herr KA, "Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly", Appl Nurs Res, 6, pp.39~46 (1993)
  24. Linton SJ, "A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance", Pain, 17, pp.57~65 (1983)
  25. Turk DC, "Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: determination of success", Pain, 53, pp.3~16 (1993)
  26. Jensen MP, "The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices", Clin J Pain, 5, pp.153~159 (1989)
  27. Holroyd KA, "A multi-center evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire: results from more than 1700 chronic pain patients", Pain, 48, pp.301~311 (1992)
  28. Lowe NK, "Confirming the theoretical structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in acute clinical pain", Pain, 46, pp.53~60 (1991)
  29. Boureau F, "Comparative study of the validity of four French McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) versions", Pain, 50, pp.59~65 (1992)
  30. Strand LI, "The development of a Norwegian pain questionnaire", Pain, 46, pp.61~66 (1991)
  31. Debono DJ, "Caring for patients with chronic pain: pearls and pitfalls", J Am Osteopath Assoc, 113, pp.620~627 (2013)
  32. Rozenberg S, "Chronic low back pain: definition and treatment", Rev Prat, 58, pp.265~272 (2008)
  33. Patel AT, "Diagnosis and management of acute low back pain", Am Fam Physician, 61, pp.1779~1790 (2000)
  34. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, "National Institutes of Health. Low back pain fact sheet for patients and the public", J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother, 18, pp.95~110 (2004)
  35. Stojanovic M, "Quantitative sensory testing in pain states", Curr Rev Pain, 2, pp.201~205 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation affect pain, neuropathic pain, and sympathetic skin responses in the treatment of chronic low back pain? A randomized, placebocontrolled studyAyşegül Ketenci, Elif Kocasoy Orhan, Elif Yakşi, Mehmet Barış Baslo대한통증학회 · The Korean Journal of Pain2021 · 제34권 제2호The Availability of Quantitative Assessment of Pain Perception in Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy박진, 김성훈, 김지현, 박태준, 이희찬, 정세훈대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제3호Validation of the Korean Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Lumbar or Lumbar-Radicular Pain김호중, 박준희, 백창현, 신재훈, 염진섭, 이춘기, 장봉순, Didier Bouhassira연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제2호Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study송지민, 이장우, 임영호, 최은희대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제2호Usefulness of four commonly used neuropathic pain screening questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional studyBabita Ghai, Dipika Bansal, Kapil Gudala대한통증학회 · The Korean Journal of Pain2017 · 제30권 제1호Effect of Intradiscal Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency on Chronic Discogenic Back Pain Diagnosed by Pressure-Controlled Provocative Discography: A One Year Prospective Study안상호, 이동규, 정용재, 조윤우대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2012 · 제36권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)