The Accessibility and Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation in COVID-19 Pandemic Era
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To prospectively compare the efficacy of conventional center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) and home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Ninety Patients were divided into HBCR and CBCR groups based on cardiovascular risk stratification and individual preference. The CBCR group performed supervised in-hospital exercise training 2–3 times/week and subsequent self-exercise at home. The HBCR group performed self-exercise at home after one or two sessions of exercise education. The cardiopulmonary exercise test results at baseline and those at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were analyzed as primary outcome.Results: The peak oxygen consumption (peak VO<sub>2</sub>, mL/kg/min) in the CBCR group was 20.1 and 24.0 at baseline and 12 months, respectively, showing significant improvement (p=0.006). In the HBCR group, it only increased from 24.4 to 25.5, showing suboptimal improvement. A significant increase in the Korean activity scale/index was confirmed only in the CBCR group (p=0.04). The cardiovascular outcome did not differ between the two groups, nor did the dropout rate or demographic factors. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, only CBCR was associated with a significant improvement in peak VO<sub>2</sub> and physical activity levels, a finding that differs from those of other studies and seems to be affected by COVID-19. Therefore, in situations where the importance of HBCR is emphasized, it is essential to introduce measures to monitor and enhance exercise adherence among participants.
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively compare the efficacy of conventional center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) and home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Ninety Patients were divided into HBCR and CBCR groups based on cardiovascular risk stratification and individual preference. The CBCR group performed supervised in-hospital exercise training 2–3 times/week and subsequent self-exercise at home. The HBCR group performed self-exercise at home after one or two sessions of exercise education. The cardiopulmonary exercise test results at baseline and those at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were analyzed as primary outcome.Results: The peak oxygen consumption (peak VO<sub>2</sub>, mL/kg/min) in the CBCR group was 20.1 and 24.0 at baseline and 12 months, respectively, showing significant improvement (p=0.006). In the HBCR group, it only increased from 24.4 to 25.5, showing suboptimal improvement. A significant increase in the Korean activity scale/index was confirmed only in the CBCR group (p=0.04). The cardiovascular outcome did not differ between the two groups, nor did the dropout rate or demographic factors. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, only CBCR was associated with a significant improvement in peak VO<sub>2</sub> and physical activity levels, a finding that differs from those of other studies and seems to be affected by COVID-19. Therefore, in situations where the importance of HBCR is emphasized, it is essential to introduce measures to monitor and enhance exercise adherence among participants.
참고문헌 (39)
- Kim C, "Current status of cardiac rehabilitation in the regional cardiocerebrovascular centers in Korea", J Clin Med, 10, pp.5079~ (2021)
- Kim KH, "Fact sheet on cardiac rehabilitation for cardiovascular disease in South Korea", Ann Rehabil Med, 47, pp.318~325 (2023)
- Thomas RJ, "Home-based cardiac rehabilitation : a scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology", Circulation, 140, pp.e69~e89 (2019)
- Graversen CB, "Influence of socioeconomic status on the referral process to cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome : a cross-sectional study", BMJ Open, 10, pp.e036088~ (2020)
- Buckingham SA, "Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation : abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis", Open Heart, 3, pp.e000463~ (2016)
- Dalal HM, "Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation : Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis", BMJ, 340, pp.b5631~ (2010)
- Redfern J, "Historical context of cardiac rehabilitation : learning from the past to move to the future", Front Cardiovasc Med, 9, pp.842567~ (2022)
- Kirwan R, "Impact of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on cardiac rehabilitation participation and behaviours in the United Kingdom", BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, 14, pp.67~ (2022)
- Varghese MS, "Cardiac rehabilitation and the COVID-19 pandemic : persistent declines in cardiac rehabilitation participation and access among US Medicare beneficiaries", Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 15, pp.e009618~ (2022)
- Ghisi GLM, "Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation delivery around the world", Glob Heart, 16, pp.43~ (2021)
- Kim C, "Validation of wearable digital devices for heart rate measurement during exercise test in patients with coronary artery disease", Ann Rehabil Med, 47, pp.261~271 (2023)
- Kim C, "Accuracy and validity of commercial smart bands for heart rate measurements during cardiopulmonary exercise test", Ann Rehabil Med, 46, pp.209~218 (2022)
- Imran HM, "Home-based cardiac rehabilitation alone and hybrid with center-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Am Heart Assoc, 8, pp.e012779~ (2019)
- Serdar CC, "Sample size, power and effect size revisited : simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 31, pp.010502~ (2021)
- Kang H, "Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software", J Educ Eval Health Prof, 18, pp.17~ (2021)
- Fletcher GF, "Exercise standards for testing and training : a scientific statement from the American Heart Association", Circulation, 128, pp.873~934 (2013)
- Bhat AG, "Evaluation of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation exercise risk stratification classification tool without exercise testing", J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 41, pp.257~263 (2021)
- Sung J, "Development of Korean activity scale", index(KASI), 2000, pp.30, 1004~1009
- Kim SH, "The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea", Qual Life Res, 25, pp.1845~1852 (2016)
- Middleton WA, "Benchmarking depressive symptoms in cardiac rehabilitation", J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 42, pp.163~171 (2022)
- Laoutaris ID, "Cardiovascular rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era : ‘a phoenix arising from the ashes?’", Eur J Prev Cardiol, 29, pp.1372~1374 (2022)
- Sheng SP, "Adherence and exercise capacity improvements of patients with adult congenital heart disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation", J Am Heart Assoc, 11, pp.e023896~ (2022)
- Martin BJ, "Cardiovascular fitness and mortality after contemporary cardiac rehabilitation", Mayo Clin Proc, 88, pp.455~463 (2013)
- Kim C, "Do patients maintain proper long-term cardiopulmonary fitness levels after cardiac rehabilitation? A retrospective study using medical records", Ann Rehabil Med, 45, pp.150~159 (2021)
- Little KA, "Predictors of changes in peak oxygen uptake after outpatient cardiac rehabilitation : importance of cardiac rehabilitation attendance", Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes, 6, pp.428~435 (2022)
- Jafri SH, "Cardiovascular outcomes of patients referred to home based cardiac rehabilitation", Heart Lung, 52, pp.1~7 (2022)
- Nkonde-Price C, "Comparison of home-based vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation in hospitalization, medication adherence, and risk factor control among patients with cardiovascular disease", JAMA Netw Open, 5, pp.e2228720~ (2022)
- Epstein E, "Cardiac rehab in the COVID era and beyond : mHealth and other novel opportunities", Curr Cardiol Rep, 23, pp.42~ (2021)
- Dunlay SM, "Participation in cardiac rehabilitation, readmissions, and death after acute myocardial infarction", Am J Med, 127, pp.538~546 (2014)
- Williamson-Reisdorph CM, "Hybrid and traditional cardiac rehabilitation in a rural area : a retrospective study", J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 43, pp.253~258 (2023)
- Svendsen ML, "To what extend is socioeconomic status associated with not taking up and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation : a population-based follow-up study", BMJ Open, 12, pp.e060924~ (2022)
- Shanmugasegaram S, "Cardiac rehabilitation barriers by rurality and socioeconomic status : a cross-sectional study", Int J Equity Health, 12, pp.72~ (2013)
- Ravn MB, "Why do patients with ischaemic heart disease drop out from cardiac rehabilitation in primary health settings. A qualitative audit of patient charts", Front Rehabil Sci, 3, pp.837174~ (2022)
- Kim SH, "Underutilization of hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction in Korea", J Korean Med Sci, 35, pp.e262~ (2020)
- Carmody TP, "Physical exercise rehabilitation : long-term dropout rate in cardiac patients", J Behav Med, 3, pp.163~168 (1980)
- Pecci C, "Cardiac rehab in the COVID-19 pandemic", Am J Med, 134, pp.559~560 (2021)
- Ramachandran HJ, "Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation of coronary heart disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Eur J Prev Cardiol, 29, pp.1017~1043 (2022)
- Sari DM, "Cardiac rehabilitation via telerehabilitation in COVID-19 pandemic situation", Egypt Heart J, 73, pp.31~ (2021)
- Kawada T, "Clinical benefits in patients with home-based cardiac rehabilitation in the era of COVID-19 pandemic", Heart Lung, 52, pp.197~ (2022)