본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Extensive Multilabel Classification of Brain MRI Scans for Infarcts Using the Swin UNETR Architecture in Deep Learning Applications

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective: To distinguish infarct location and type with the utmost precision using the advantages of the Swin UNEt TRansformers (Swin UNETR) architecture.Methods: The research employed a two-phase training approach. In the first phase, the Swin UNETR model was trained using the Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation Challenge (ISLES) 2022 dataset, which included cases of acute and subacute infarcts. The second phase involved training with data from 309 patients. The 110 categories result from classifying infarcts based on 22 specific brain regions. Each region is divided into right and left sides, and each side includes four types of infarcts (acute, acute lacunar, subacute, subacute lacunar). The unique architecture of Swin UNETR, integrating elements of both the transformer and u-net designs with a hierarchical transformer computed with shifted windows, played a crucial role in the study.Results: During Swin UNETR training with the ISLES 2022 dataset, batch loss decreased to 0.8885±0.1897, with training and validation dice scores reaching 0.4224±0.0710 and 0.4827±0.0607, respectively. The optimal model weight had a validation dice score of 0.5747. In the patient data model, batch loss decreased to 0.0565±0.0427, with final training and validation accuracies of 0.9842±0.0005 and 0.9837±0.0010.Conclusion: The results of this study surpass the accuracy of similar studies, but they involve the issue of overfitting, highlighting the need for future efforts to improve generalizability. Such detailed classifications could significantly aid physicians in diagnosing infarcts in clinical settings.

Abstract

Objective: To distinguish infarct location and type with the utmost precision using the advantages of the Swin UNEt TRansformers (Swin UNETR) architecture.Methods: The research employed a two-phase training approach. In the first phase, the Swin UNETR model was trained using the Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation Challenge (ISLES) 2022 dataset, which included cases of acute and subacute infarcts. The second phase involved training with data from 309 patients. The 110 categories result from classifying infarcts based on 22 specific brain regions. Each region is divided into right and left sides, and each side includes four types of infarcts (acute, acute lacunar, subacute, subacute lacunar). The unique architecture of Swin UNETR, integrating elements of both the transformer and u-net designs with a hierarchical transformer computed with shifted windows, played a crucial role in the study.Results: During Swin UNETR training with the ISLES 2022 dataset, batch loss decreased to 0.8885±0.1897, with training and validation dice scores reaching 0.4224±0.0710 and 0.4827±0.0607, respectively. The optimal model weight had a validation dice score of 0.5747. In the patient data model, batch loss decreased to 0.0565±0.0427, with final training and validation accuracies of 0.9842±0.0005 and 0.9837±0.0010.Conclusion: The results of this study surpass the accuracy of similar studies, but they involve the issue of overfitting, highlighting the need for future efforts to improve generalizability. Such detailed classifications could significantly aid physicians in diagnosing infarcts in clinical settings.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. McCulloch WS, "A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity", Bull Math Biol, 5, pp.115~133 (1943)
  2. Rosenblatt F, "Ideas that created the future: classic papers of computer science", pp.183~ (1958), The MIT Press
  3. Minsky M, "Neurocomputing, volume 1: foundations of research", pp.675~ (1988), The MIT Press
  4. Rumelhart DE, "Parallel distributed processing, volume 1: explorations in the microstructure of cognition: foundations", pp.676~679 (1986), The MIT Press
  5. Hatamizadeh A, "UNETR: transformers for 3D medical image segmentation", Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE, 2022, ~[DOI]
  6. LeCun Y, "Convolutional networks and applications in vision", Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (2010), IEEE
  7. Hatamizadeh A, "Swin UNETR: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in MRI images", Proceedings of the 7th International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop (2022), Springer
  8. Ronneberger O, "U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, MICCAI 2015 (2015), Springer
  9. Vaswani A, "Attention is all you need", Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) (2017), Curran Associates, Inc
  10. Liu Z, "Swin transformer: hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows", Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE, 2022, ~[DOI]
  11. Etherton MR, "Infarct topography and functional outcomes", J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 38, pp.1517~1532 (2018)
  12. Bates E, "Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping", Nat Neurosci, 6, pp.448~450 (2003)
  13. Lo R, "Identification of critical areas for motor function recovery in chronic stroke subjects using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping", Neuroimage, 49, pp.9~18 (2010)
  14. Goldenberg G, "Influence of size and site of cerebral lesions on spontaneous recovery of aphasia and on success of language therapy", Brain Lang, 47, pp.684~698 (1994)
  15. Munsch F, "Stroke location is an independent predictor of cognitive outcome", Stroke, 47, pp.66~73 (2016)
  16. "Google Colab"[URL]
  17. Hernandez Petzsche MR, "ISLES 2022 : a multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset", Sci Data, 9, pp.762~ (2022)
  18. "PyTorch-Ignite"[URL]
  19. "MONAI"[URL]
  20. "Project-MONAI / tutorials" (2022)[URL]
  21. "Weights"[URL]
  22. "EarlyStopping"[URL]
  23. "Loss functions"[URL]
  24. Wang P, "Focal dice loss and image dilation for brain tumor segmentation", Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis, DLMIA 2018, and the 8th International Workshop on Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, ML-CDS 2018 (2018), Springer
  25. "Event handlers"[URL]
  26. Mangla R, "Border zone infarcts : pathophysiologic and imaging characteristics", Radiographics, 31, pp.1201~1214 (2011)
  27. Fisher CM, "Lacunes : small, deep cerebral infarcts", Neurology, 50, pp.841~841 (1998)
  28. Ho Y, "The real-world-weight cross-entropy loss function : modeling the costs of mislabeling", IEEE Access, 8, pp.4806~4813 (2019)
  29. "Accuracy"[URL]
  30. Subudhi A, "Segmentation and classification of ischemic stroke using optimized features in brain MRI", Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun, 30, pp.1850011~ (2018)
  31. Cetinoglu YK, "Detection and vascular territorial classification of stroke on diffusion-weighted MRI by deep learning", Eur J Radiol, 145, pp.110050~ (2021)
  32. Myronenko A, "3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization", Proceedings of the 4th International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop (2019), Springer
  33. Isensee F, "nnU-Net : a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation", Nat Methods, 18, pp.203~211 (2021)
  34. Wang W, "TransBTS: multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer", Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, MICCAI 2021 (2021), Springer
  35. "ImageNet"[URL]
  36. Wardlaw JM, "Accuracy of automated computer-aided diagnosis for stroke imaging : a critical evaluation of current evidence", Stroke, 53, pp.2393~2403 (2022)
  37. Mokli Y, "Computer-aided imaging analysis in acute ischemic stroke-background and clinical applications", Neurol Res Pract, 1, pp.23~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

Deep Learning-Based Automatic Classification of Ischemic Stroke Subtype Using Diffusion-Weighted Images김치경, 배희준, 차재관, Beom Joon Kim, Dae-Hyun Kim, Dawid Schellingerhout, Dong-Eog Kim, Dongmin Kim, Hoyoun Lee, Jae-Sung Lim, Jong-Won Chung, Joon-Tae Kim, Keon-Joo Lee, Leonard Sunwoo, Oh Young Bang, Sang-Il Suh, Wi-Sun Ryu대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2024 · 제26권 제2호Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Imaging of Ischemic Stroke윤웅, 김슬기, 박일우, 백병현, Ara Cho, Luu-Ngoc Do대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2022 · 제26권 제4호A Multimodal Ensemble Deep Learning Model for Functional Outcome Prognosis of Stroke Patients강동화, 박경필, 유경호, 차재관, Bum Joon Kim, Dae-Il Chang, Dong-Eog Kim, Eun-Jae Lee, Han Jin Cho, Hye-Soo Jung, Jin-Man Jung, Jong S. Kim, Ju Hun Lee, Jun Lee, Jun Young Chang, Keun-Sik Hong, Man-Seok Park, Seong Hwan Ahn, Sung-Il Sohn, Sun U. Kwon대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2024 · 제26권 제2호Deep into the Brain: Artificial Intelligence in Stroke Imaging강동화, 김남국, 김용환, 이은재대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2017 · 제19권 제3호Acute Infarct Segmentation on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Deep Learning Algorithm and RAPID MRIKang You-Ri, Kim Beom Joon, Kim Byeong C., Kim Dongmin, Kim Joon-Tae, Noh Yoon-Gon, Park Jong-Hyeok, Park Man-Seok, Ryu Wi-Sun대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2023 · 제25권 제3호Deep Learning–Based Automatic Classification of Stroke Size in Patients With Atrial FibrillationBeom Joon Kim, Byung-Chul Lee, Dong-Eog Kim, Dong-Ick Shin, Do Yeon Kim, Han-Gil Jeong, Hee-Joon Bae, Hokyu Kim, Hong-Kyun Park, Hoyoun Lee, Jae Guk Kim, Jay Chol Choi, Jee-Hyun Kwon, Jeong-Ho Hong, Jong-Moo Park, Joon-Tae Kim, Jun Lee, Kang-Ho Choi, Keon-Joo Lee, Keun-Sik Hong, Kyung-Ho Yu, Kyusik Kang, Mi Sun Oh, Moon-Ku Han, Soo Joo Lee, Sung-Il Sohn, Tai Hwan Park, Wi-Sun Ryu, Wook-Joo Kim, Yong-Jin Cho대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2025 · 제27권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)