일본신화 속의 고대한국
Ancient Korea in the Japanese Mythology
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to 『Kojiki (古事記』)와 『Nihon Shoki (日本書紀)』, rulers had been sent to the ground twice from Gocheonwon(高天原.) One was Susanoo's myth and the other was Ninigi's myth. It is not too much to say that these two forces play a pivotal role in the Japanese mythology. Generally, the former is also called Izumo (出雲) myth, and the latter Hyuga (日向) myth. Korea has been deeply involved in both cases. Izumo (出雲) cycle was the one who crossed the sea from Shilla and settled down in the Izumo province. They worshiped mythical figures, Susanoo and Onamuji, as their ancestors. Whereas Hyuga (日向) cycle was the one who crossed the sea from Kaya and settled down in the Kyushu province. They worshiped mythical figures, Amaterasu and Ninigi, as their ancestors. Both forces ruled over different regions and established their own powers, so that there had been no conflict at the beginning. However, two forces went into a war and the Izumo cycle was defeated. As a result, Hyuga cycle exercised dominion over Izumo cycle who just had to withdrawn from the power force. It is believed that their power struggle didn't reached an amicable settlement, and that the remnants of the Izumo cycle had put up a stiff resistance. The two forces had been completely united under the rule of Jimmu, the first Emperor of Japan, when Jimmu and Iskeyori got married. Jimmu, descendent form Hyuga (日向) cycle, got married to Iskeyori, daughter of Ohomononushi who was the leader of Izumo cycle. As a result, next emperor of Japan might be the descendant of both Hyuga and Izumo cycles. Against this backdrop, the previous translation by the Japanese that their marriage could mean the establishment of royal authority between the conqueror and the original settlers might not be true. Rather, it could mean that Susanoo cycle (Izumo) and Amaterasu cycle (Hyuga), who had been hostile to each other under the Japanese mythology system, combined and formed a new power. At the same time, it could mean that the Kaya force had absorbed the Shilla force and created the Imperial Family of Japan.
Abstract
According to 『Kojiki (古事記』)와 『Nihon Shoki (日本書紀)』, rulers had been sent to the ground twice from Gocheonwon(高天原.) One was Susanoo's myth and the other was Ninigi's myth. It is not too much to say that these two forces play a pivotal role in the Japanese mythology. Generally, the former is also called Izumo (出雲) myth, and the latter Hyuga (日向) myth. Korea has been deeply involved in both cases. Izumo (出雲) cycle was the one who crossed the sea from Shilla and settled down in the Izumo province. They worshiped mythical figures, Susanoo and Onamuji, as their ancestors. Whereas Hyuga (日向) cycle was the one who crossed the sea from Kaya and settled down in the Kyushu province. They worshiped mythical figures, Amaterasu and Ninigi, as their ancestors. Both forces ruled over different regions and established their own powers, so that there had been no conflict at the beginning. However, two forces went into a war and the Izumo cycle was defeated. As a result, Hyuga cycle exercised dominion over Izumo cycle who just had to withdrawn from the power force. It is believed that their power struggle didn't reached an amicable settlement, and that the remnants of the Izumo cycle had put up a stiff resistance. The two forces had been completely united under the rule of Jimmu, the first Emperor of Japan, when Jimmu and Iskeyori got married. Jimmu, descendent form Hyuga (日向) cycle, got married to Iskeyori, daughter of Ohomononushi who was the leader of Izumo cycle. As a result, next emperor of Japan might be the descendant of both Hyuga and Izumo cycles. Against this backdrop, the previous translation by the Japanese that their marriage could mean the establishment of royal authority between the conqueror and the original settlers might not be true. Rather, it could mean that Susanoo cycle (Izumo) and Amaterasu cycle (Hyuga), who had been hostile to each other under the Japanese mythology system, combined and formed a new power. At the same time, it could mean that the Kaya force had absorbed the Shilla force and created the Imperial Family of Japan.
참고문헌 (39)
- 일왕가의 본향은 거창 가조이다; 거창의 역사와 문화, "김종택", 거창군. 경북대 영남문화연구원, ~ (2004)
- 김정미, "고사기에 있어서 천손강림신화고 -한국신화와의 비교연구", 일어일문학연구, 13 (1988), 한국일어일문학회
- 김열규, "한국신화와 일본신화", 사상과 정책, 5 (1984), 경향신문사
- 노성환, "고사기(상)" (1987), 예전사
- 노성환, "고사기(중)" (1990), 예전사
- 노성환, "한일왕권신화" (1995), 울산대출판부
- 소재영, "일본신화의 韓來人; 한국설화문학연구" (1989), 숭실대 출판부
- 고대한일관계사연구, "손대준", 경기대학교 학술진흥원, ~ (1993)
- 세키네히데유키, "한일합병 전에 제창된 일본인종의 한반도 도래설", 일본문화연구, 19(19), pp.163~186 (2006), 동아시아일본학회
- 고천원과 소시모리의 비정문제; 거창의 역사와 문화, "이병선", 거창군. 경북대 영남문화연구원, ~ (2004)
- 이종환, "고대 가야족이 세운 九州王朝" (1987), 대왕사
- 이영희, "일본건국신화의 주인공과 한국", 국민윤리연구, 16 (1983), 한국윤리학회
- 이창수, "「記紀神話」에 나타난 ‘韓’과 「スサノヲ」", 일본연구, 19, pp.137~154 (2002), 일본연구소
- 황패강, "일본 신화 속의 한국", 한국학보, 20 (1980), 일지사
- 홍윤기, "일본천황은 한국인이다" (2000), 효형출판
- 홍윤기, "신라 대국주신 모신 사쿠라이시 대신신사", 한글한자문화, 106 (2008), 전국한자교육교육추진진흥연합회
- 井上光貞監譯, "日本書紀(上)" (1987), 中央公論社
- 上田正昭, "神話における日本と朝鮮」 日本と朝鮮の二千年" (1969), 太平出版社
- 上野千鶴子, "<外部>の分節 -記紀の神話論理學", 佛敎と日本人, 1 (1986), 神と佛春秋社
- 金澤庄三郞, "古事記の一節に関する私疑", 帝國文學, 10 (1904)
- 金澤庄三郞, "日鮮同祖論" (1978), 成甲書房
- 上垣外憲一, "天孫降臨の道" (1986), 筑摩書房
- 金思燁, "古代朝鮮語と日本語" (1974), 講談社
- 金達壽, "古代日本と朝鮮文化" (1984), 筑摩書房
- 大和岩雄, "秦氏の硏究" (1993), 大和書房
- 佐伯有淸, "新撰姓氏錄の硏究<本文編>" (1962), 吉川弘文館
- 田蒙秀, "上古に於ける稻作と稻及び米の名にみる日鮮關係; 日本神話硏究 -出雲神話. 日向神話" (1972), 學生社
- 中島悅次, "食物起源の神話の展開」 日本神話(1)" (1978), 有精堂
- 長田夏樹, "日本神話の農耕起源說話について -東雅臆度抄, 草木譜外篇", 日本學, 8 (1989), 동국대 일본학연구소
- 中西進, "天つ神の世界 -古事記を読む-(1)" (1985), 角川書店
- 中西進, "大和の大王たち -古事記を読む -(2)-" (1986), 角川書店
- 松前健, "出雲神話" (1976), 講談社
- 松前健, "大和國家と神話傳承" (1986), 雄山閣出版
- 松前健, "古代王權の神話學" (2003), 雄山閣
- 馬淵和夫, "日本語の姿" (1999), 武藏書院
- 水野正好, "大神神社成立前後史; 神奈備 大神 三輪明神" (1997), 東方出版
- 水野祐, "出雲神話" (1972), 八雲書房
- 安本美典, "高天原の謎 -日本神話と邪馬臺國-" (1977), 講談社
- 山本節, "神話の森" (1989), 大修館書店
