본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근현대 한국 지식인들의 바이칼 인식 - 한민족의 기원문제와 관련하여 -

Modern Korean Intellectuals’ Perception of Baikal - In Relation to the Origin of the Korean Race -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper examines how modern Korean intellectuals perceive Baikal in relation to the origin of the Korean race and culture. Baikal is always included when discussing where the Korean race came from and which region is related to a certain part of the Korean culture. Although Central Asia, Altai or Siberia are included and commonly called the northern region according to the writer, in many cases, Baikal is mentioned as the center. It is difficult to specify since when the Korean intellectuals had this notion but it can at least be confirmed that the so-called Baikal theory appeared in the early 20th century. During the 20th century and even at present, Baikal is discussed as the land from which the Korean race or culture originated. Although some of these such arguments are acceptable, there are many that are hard to agree with. There are many cases in which the external argument looks to be acceptable but the contents are severely lacking in academic basis. This is caused by the prejudice of the writers, though it is also related to the characteristic of the topic of a race’s origin. With this in mind, the Baikal theory that has been discussed until the present was reexamined to analyze the validity of the argument and the reasons for its emergence. First, the perception of Baikal of the Korean intellectuals who visited Baikal in the early 20th century, which was when the Baikal theory first appeared, and those who visited the region in the modern age was reviewed, and based on this, it was verified whether Baikal was where the Korean race and culture originated. As a result, the following conclusion was reached. The Baikal theory, in which the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from Baikal, basically has its roots in the northen region theory, where the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from the northern region. Intellectuals have been explaining the Korean race and culture in relation to the northern region since the start of the 20th century. Nevertheless, the northern region perceived by our past intellectuals is ambiguous. North and south Manchuria, inner and outer Mongolia, far east Maritime Province, Siberia and the Altaic region were all commonly called the northern region. Baikal is located within this united group of the northern region, and modern scholars and writers also include Manchuria, Siberia and even Mongolia when discussing Baikal. The conclusion is that the northern region, which was perceived as the origin of the Korean race and culture for more than a century and the scope of which was ambiguously defined, changed to Baikal after the 1990s and Baikal is currently understood as the region from which the Korean race and culture originated.

Abstract

This paper examines how modern Korean intellectuals perceive Baikal in relation to the origin of the Korean race and culture. Baikal is always included when discussing where the Korean race came from and which region is related to a certain part of the Korean culture. Although Central Asia, Altai or Siberia are included and commonly called the northern region according to the writer, in many cases, Baikal is mentioned as the center. It is difficult to specify since when the Korean intellectuals had this notion but it can at least be confirmed that the so-called Baikal theory appeared in the early 20th century. During the 20th century and even at present, Baikal is discussed as the land from which the Korean race or culture originated. Although some of these such arguments are acceptable, there are many that are hard to agree with. There are many cases in which the external argument looks to be acceptable but the contents are severely lacking in academic basis. This is caused by the prejudice of the writers, though it is also related to the characteristic of the topic of a race’s origin. With this in mind, the Baikal theory that has been discussed until the present was reexamined to analyze the validity of the argument and the reasons for its emergence. First, the perception of Baikal of the Korean intellectuals who visited Baikal in the early 20th century, which was when the Baikal theory first appeared, and those who visited the region in the modern age was reviewed, and based on this, it was verified whether Baikal was where the Korean race and culture originated. As a result, the following conclusion was reached. The Baikal theory, in which the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from Baikal, basically has its roots in the northen region theory, where the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from the northern region. Intellectuals have been explaining the Korean race and culture in relation to the northern region since the start of the 20th century. Nevertheless, the northern region perceived by our past intellectuals is ambiguous. North and south Manchuria, inner and outer Mongolia, far east Maritime Province, Siberia and the Altaic region were all commonly called the northern region. Baikal is located within this united group of the northern region, and modern scholars and writers also include Manchuria, Siberia and even Mongolia when discussing Baikal. The conclusion is that the northern region, which was perceived as the origin of the Korean race and culture for more than a century and the scope of which was ambiguously defined, changed to Baikal after the 1990s and Baikal is currently understood as the region from which the Korean race and culture originated.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. 강인욱, "시베리아 고고학연구의 성과와 과제-한국, 중국동북지방과의 관계를 중심으로-", 한국선사고고학보, (12) (2006)
  2. 강인욱, "유라시아 역사기행" (2015), 민음사
  3. 김동훈, "시베리아동부 바이칼 일대의 고고유적과 문화 - 프리바이칼 소해협과 자바이칼 울란우데의 주요유적을 중심으로 -", 러시아연구, 21(2), pp.249~278 (2011), 러시아연구소[DOI]
  4. 김산호, "대조선제국사 1권" (1993), 동아출판사
  5. 김원룡, "한국고고학개설" (1998), 일지사
  6. 김욱, "바이칼, 한민족의 시원을 찾아서" (2003), 정신세계사
  7. 김욱, "미토콘드리아 DNA변이와 한국인 집단의 기원에 관한 연구" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  8. 김정배, "한국민족의 기원" (1973), 고려대학교출판부
  9. 김정학, "고고학상으로 본 한국민족", 백산학보, 1 (1966)
  10. 김정학, "문헌 및 고고학상적 고찰", 한국사론, 14 (1985), 국사편찬위원회
  11. 김정훈, "시베리아 진주 바이칼 한민족 발원지", 통일한국 (2011)
  12. 김화경, "일본 날개옷 설화의 연구", 어문학, (95), pp.469~498 (2007), 한국어문학회
  13. 신채호, "조선상고사" (2013), 비봉출판사
  14. 도미야 이타루, "나는 이제 오랑캐의 옷을 입었소" (2003), 시공사
  15. 東谷, "杭州西湖에서", 개벽, (39) (1923)
  16. 몽양여운형선생전집발간위원회, "몽양여운형선생전집 1" (1991), 한울
  17. 문정창, "고조선사연구" (1969), 백문당
  18. 박광숙, "바이칼", 문예운동, 96 (2007)
  19. 朴露兒, "北國의 겨울", 별건곤, (24) (1929)
  20. 孫晉泰, "朝鮮民族說話의 硏究" (1947), 乙酉文化史
  21. 센덴자빈 돌람, "몽골신화의 형상" (2007), 태학사
  22. 성백인, "한국 민족의 기원과 형성(하)" (1996), 소화
  23. 신대철, "바이칼 키스" (2007), 문학과 지성사
  24. 申興雨, "西伯利亞의 橫斷", 삼천리, 12(9) (1940)
  25. 이광수, "유정을 새로 쓰면서", 삼천리, 5(10) (1933)
  26. 이광수, "유정", pp.2013~ (2013), 푸른생각
  27. 이기동, "기원 연구의 흐름", 한국사 시민강좌, 32 (2003), 일조각
  28. 이선복, "신석기청동기시대 주민 교체설에 대한 비판적 검토", 한국고대사논총, 1 (1991)
  29. 이선복, "한국 민족의 기원과 형성(상)" (1996), 소화
  30. 이선아, "한 · 몽 신화에서의 영웅의 형상과 성격 일고찰- 단군과 게세르칸 신격의 신화적 전개 양상을 중심으로", 외국문학연구, (59), pp.279~306 (2015), 외국문학연구소
  31. 이지택, "바이칼의 경수(외지에서 맞은 여름)", 민성, 5(7) (1949)
  32. 이지택, "시베리아의 3․1운동", 월간중앙 (1971)
  33. 이평래, "실크로드와 한국문화" (1999), 소나무
  34. 이한수, "시베리아 바이칼 호 답사기" (2007), 습지와 생명
  35. 이헌종, "바이칼, 한민족의 시원을 찾아서" (2003), 정신세계사
  36. 이홍규, "바이칼, 한민족의 시원을 찾아서" (2003), 정신세계사
  37. 이홍규, "한국인의 기원" (2010), 우리역사연구재단
  38. 일리야 N. 마다손, "바이칼의 게세르 신화" (2008), 솔
  39. 임경석, "한국사회주의 기원" (2003), 역사비평사
  40. 장장식, "한․몽 ‘나무꾼과 선녀설화’의 비교 연구", 민속학연구, 9 (2001)
  41. 정석배, "쁘리바이칼 지역의 신석기문화", 한국시베리아 연구, 12(2) (2008)
  42. "조선일보", ~
  43. 주채혁, "바이칼 문화의 연구, 그 문제와 視角", 인문과학연구, 3 (1996)
  44. 최기호, "하라호롬에서 바이칼호까지", 몽골학, (3) (1995)
  45. 최남선, "불함문화론" (2008), 우리역사연구재단
  46. 최몽룡, "한국문화의 원류를 찾아서: 고고기행" (1997), 학연문화사
  47. 최몽룡, "시베리아의 선사고고학" (2003), 도서출판 주류성
  48. 최정필, "인류학상으로 본 한민족 기원 문제에 대한 비판적 검토", 한국상고사학보, 1 (1991)
  49. "단재론(42) 丹齋와 나"[URL]
  50. "한국사데이터베이스"[URL]
  51. 한영희, "한국 민족의 기원과 형성(상)" (1995), 소화
  52. 한영희, "한국 민족의 기원과 형성(상)" (1996), 소화
  53. 황필호, "부리야트 무교 연구의 필요성", 종교연구, 14 (1997)
  54. 한명수, "외국지리", 태극학보, (6) (1907)
  55. 藤田亮策, "櫛目文樣土器の分布についで", 靑丘學叢, 2, pp.107~122 (1930)
  56. 松本 秀雄, "免疫グロブリンの遺伝標識Gm遺伝子に基づいた蒙古系民族の特徴--日本民族の起源について", 人類学雑誌, 95(3) (1987)
  57. Persits, M.I., "AN SSSR, KOMINTEI i VOSTOK" (1969), NAUKA

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)