본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Ventricular Dyssynchrony According to the Position of Right Ventricular Pacing Electrode: A Multi-Center Prospective Echocardiographic Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background: Conventional pacemaker implantation induces left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, which might affect the LV function. We sought to evaluate the impact of different right ventricular (RV) pacing sites on the LV dyssynchrony and performance. Methods: Comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation including the atrio-ventricular, inter- and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony based on M-mode, conventional Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was done before and immediately after (< 7 days) pacemaker implantation. For the LV performance, LV ejection fraction, longitudinal peak systolic velocity at the mitral annulus (S’) annular or mean longitudinal velocity of the 6 basal segments (Sm) were used. These results were compared with those of 15 age matched controls. Results: A total of 79 patients (48 females, mean age 63 ± 12 years) underwent RV pacing at the apex (n = 45, group I) or the septum (n = 34, group II). After pacemaker implantation, the QRS duration was significantly increased in both groups, but the change was greater in group I (57.1 ± 28.3 versus 32.8 ± 40.5 msec). Both the S’ and Sm were lower in pacing groups than those in controls and Sm was significantly higher in group II (4.2 ± 1.0 versus 4.9 ± 1.3 m/sec) than group I despite a similar LV ejection fraction. The aortic pre-ejection time and septal to posterior wall motion delay in patients with pacemaker were longer compared to normal controls, but there were no significant differences. Both the TDI velocity and strain analysis showed no difference of the dyssynchrony indices between the two groups, despite a higher tendency of Doppler strain dyssynchrony indices in the RV apical pacing group compared to those of the control. Conclusion: Despite the marked increase of the QRS duration after pacing, M-mode, Doppler and TDI failed to demonstrate any difference according to the pacing sites. The long-term effect of the longitudinal contraction being less affected and a smaller increase of the QRS duration in the RV septal pacing group needs to be confirmed in a longitudinal follow-up study.

Abstract

Background: Conventional pacemaker implantation induces left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, which might affect the LV function. We sought to evaluate the impact of different right ventricular (RV) pacing sites on the LV dyssynchrony and performance. Methods: Comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation including the atrio-ventricular, inter- and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony based on M-mode, conventional Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was done before and immediately after (< 7 days) pacemaker implantation. For the LV performance, LV ejection fraction, longitudinal peak systolic velocity at the mitral annulus (S’) annular or mean longitudinal velocity of the 6 basal segments (Sm) were used. These results were compared with those of 15 age matched controls. Results: A total of 79 patients (48 females, mean age 63 ± 12 years) underwent RV pacing at the apex (n = 45, group I) or the septum (n = 34, group II). After pacemaker implantation, the QRS duration was significantly increased in both groups, but the change was greater in group I (57.1 ± 28.3 versus 32.8 ± 40.5 msec). Both the S’ and Sm were lower in pacing groups than those in controls and Sm was significantly higher in group II (4.2 ± 1.0 versus 4.9 ± 1.3 m/sec) than group I despite a similar LV ejection fraction. The aortic pre-ejection time and septal to posterior wall motion delay in patients with pacemaker were longer compared to normal controls, but there were no significant differences. Both the TDI velocity and strain analysis showed no difference of the dyssynchrony indices between the two groups, despite a higher tendency of Doppler strain dyssynchrony indices in the RV apical pacing group compared to those of the control. Conclusion: Despite the marked increase of the QRS duration after pacing, M-mode, Doppler and TDI failed to demonstrate any difference according to the pacing sites. The long-term effect of the longitudinal contraction being less affected and a smaller increase of the QRS duration in the RV septal pacing group needs to be confirmed in a longitudinal follow-up study.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Daggett WM, "Relative contributions of the atrial systoleventricular systole interval and of patterns of ventricular activation to ventricular function during electrical pacing of the dog heart", Circ Res, 27, pp.69~79 (1970)
  2. Tops LF, "Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation", J Am Coll Cardiol, 48, pp.1642~1648 (2006)
  3. Manolis AS, "The deleterious consequences of right ventricular apical pacing: time to seek alternate site pacing", Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 29, pp.298~315 (2006)
  4. Padeletti L, "Acute effects of His bundle pacing versus left ventricular and right ventricular pacing on left ventricular function", Am J Cardiol, 100, pp.1556~1560 (2007)
  5. Kypta A, "Long-term outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing septal ventricular lead implantation compared with standard apical pacing", Europace, 10, pp.574~579 (2008)
  6. Gorcsan J, III, "Role of echocardiography to determine candidacy for cardiac resynchronization therapy", Curr Opin Cardiol, 23, pp.16~22 (2008)
  7. Cleland JG, "The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure", N Engl J Med, 352, pp.1539~1549 (2005)
  8. Pitzalis MV, "Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony", J Am Coll Cardiol, 40, pp.1615~1622 (2002)
  9. Bax JJ, "Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy", J Am Coll Cardiol, 44, pp.1834~1840 (2004)
  10. Yu CM, "Tissue Doppler imaging is superior to strain rate imaging and postsystolic shortening on the prediction of reverse remodeling in both ischemic and nonischemic heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy", Circulation, 110, pp.66~73 (2004)
  11. Miyazaki C, "Comparison of echocardiographic dyssynchrony assessment by tissue velocity and strain imaging in subjects with or without systolic dysfunction and with or without left bundle-branch block", Circulation, 117, pp.2617~2625 (2008)
  12. Kjaergaard J, "Measurement of cardiac time intervals by Doppler tissue M-mode imaging of the anterior mitral leaflet", J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 18, pp.1058~1065 (2005)
  13. Suffoletto MS, "Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy", Circulation, 113, pp.960~968 (2006)
  14. Sweeney MO, "Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction", Circulation, 107, pp.2932~2937 (2003)
  15. Tse HF, "Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function", J Am Coll Cardiol, 29, pp.744~749 (1997)
  16. Thambo JB, "Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing", Circulation, 110, pp.3766~3772 (2004)
  17. Doshi RN, "Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study)", J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 16, pp.1160~1165 (2005)
  18. Lieberman R, "Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction", J Am Coll Cardiol, 48, pp.1634~1641 (2006)
  19. Tse HF, "Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation", J Am Coll Cardiol, 40, pp.1451~1458 (2002)
  20. Pastore G, "Left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular apical pacing: relevance of baseline assessment", Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 31, pp.1456~1462 (2008)
  21. Tops LF, "Speckle-tracking radial strain reveals left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing", J Am Coll Cardiol, 50, pp.1180~1188 (2007)
  22. Wilkoff BL, "Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial", JAMA, 288, pp.3115~3123 (2002)
  23. Sweeney MO, "Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease", N Engl J Med, 357, pp.1000~1008 (2007)
  24. Albertsen AE, "DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison", Europace, 10, pp.127~133 (2008)
  25. Flevari P, "Long-term nonoutflow septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: relation to left ventricular dyssynchrony", Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 32, pp.354~362 (2009)
  26. de Cock CC, "Hemodynamic benefits of right ventricular outflow tract pacing: comparison with right ventricular apex pacing", Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 21, pp.536~541 (1998)
  27. Giudici MC, "Comparison of right ventricular outflow tract and apical lead permanent pacing on cardiac output", Am J Cardiol, 79, pp.209~212 (1997)
  28. Victor F, "Optimal right ventricular pacing site in chronically implanted patients: a prospective randomized crossover comparison of apical and outflow tract pacing", J Am Coll Cardiol, 33, pp.311~316 (1999)
  29. Rosenqvist M, "The effect of ventricular activation sequence on cardiac performance during pacing", Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 19, pp.1279~1286 (1996)
  30. Occhetta E, "Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing", J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, pp.1938~1945 (2006)
  31. Chung ES, "Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial", Circulation, 117, pp.2608~2616 (2008)
  32. Delgado V, "Acute effects of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and mechanics", Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, 2, pp.135~145 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Impact of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing and Its Frequency on Left Atrial Function조경임, Byung-Joo Choi, Hyeon-Gook Lee, Seong-Man Kim, Tae-Ik Kim, Yeo-Jeong Song한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2012 · 제20권 제1호Evaluation of Cardiac Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure Patients Using Current Echo-Doppler ModalitiesHanaa M. Fereig, Hend Osama, Rehab M. Hamdy한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2022 · 제30권 제4호Echocardiographic, Electrocardiographic Changes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy after One Year최영, 변재호, 윤호중, 정미향, 정해억한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2017 · 제25권 제2호인공 심박동기 시술 환자에서 심실동기이상김준수대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2010 · 제78권 제1호Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume Can Predict 1-Year Hierarchical Clinical Composite End Point in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy강석민, 김인수, 김태훈, 박민수, 박희남, 배한준, 엄재선, 오재원, 유희태, 이문형, 정보영, 조인정, 진무년연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2019 · 제60권 제1호Left ventricular response after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to early left atrial volume reduction강석민, 김태훈, 엄재선, 유희태, 정보영, In-Jeong Cho, Jaewon Oh, Jong-Ho Nam대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)