The Development of Clinical Document Standards for Semantic Interoperability in China
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study is aimed at developing a set of data groups (DGs) to be employed as reusable building blocks for the construction of the eight most common clinical documents used in China’s general hospitals in order to achieve their structural and semantic standardization. Methods: The Diagnostics knowledge framework, the related approaches taken from the Health Level Seven (HL7), the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), and the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) and 1,487 original clinical records were considered together to form the DG architecture and data sets. The internal structure, content, and semantics of each DG were then defined by mapping each DG data set to a corresponding Clinical Document Architecture data element and matching each DG data set to the metadata in the Chinese National Health Data Dictionary. By using the DGs as reusable building blocks, standardized structures and semantics regarding the clinical documents for semantic interoperability were able to be constructed. Results: Altogether, 5 header DGs, 48 section DGs, and 17 entry DGs were developed. Several issues regarding the DGs, including their internal structure, identifiers,data set names, definitions, length and format, data types, and value sets, were further defined. Standardized structures and semantics regarding the eight clinical documents were structured by the DGs. Conclusions: This approach of constructing clinical document standards using DGs is a feasible standard-driven solution useful in preparing documents possessing semantic interoperability among the disparate information systems in China. These standards need to be validated and refined through further study.
Abstract
Objectives: This study is aimed at developing a set of data groups (DGs) to be employed as reusable building blocks for the construction of the eight most common clinical documents used in China’s general hospitals in order to achieve their structural and semantic standardization. Methods: The Diagnostics knowledge framework, the related approaches taken from the Health Level Seven (HL7), the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), and the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) and 1,487 original clinical records were considered together to form the DG architecture and data sets. The internal structure, content, and semantics of each DG were then defined by mapping each DG data set to a corresponding Clinical Document Architecture data element and matching each DG data set to the metadata in the Chinese National Health Data Dictionary. By using the DGs as reusable building blocks, standardized structures and semantics regarding the clinical documents for semantic interoperability were able to be constructed. Results: Altogether, 5 header DGs, 48 section DGs, and 17 entry DGs were developed. Several issues regarding the DGs, including their internal structure, identifiers,data set names, definitions, length and format, data types, and value sets, were further defined. Standardized structures and semantics regarding the eight clinical documents were structured by the DGs. Conclusions: This approach of constructing clinical document standards using DGs is a feasible standard-driven solution useful in preparing documents possessing semantic interoperability among the disparate information systems in China. These standards need to be validated and refined through further study.
참고문헌 (24)
- "The white paper on China’s hospital information systems" (2008)[URL]
- Liu D, "Harmonization of health data at national level: a pilot study in China", Int J Med Inform, 79, pp.450~458 (2010)
- Liu D, "Web-based infectious disease reporting using XML forms", Int J Med Inform, 77, pp.630~640 (2008)
- "The state council approved the final draft of the longawaited healthcare reform" (2006)[URL]
- "Basic architecture and data standards of electronic health records in hospitals" (2006)[URL]
- "Continuity of care document (CCD)" (2011)[URL]
- "HL 7"[URL]
- "Technical framework" (2011)[URL]
- "HITSP/ C83: HITSP CDA content modules component" (2009)[URL]
- "IHE: changing the way healthcare" (2011)[URL]
- "HITSP: enabling healthcare interoperability" (2009)[URL]
- "Clinical document architecture" (2011)[URL]
- Dolin RH, "HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13, pp.30~39 (2006)
- "China national health data dictionary and metadata management system" (2011)[URL]
- Tu H, "Building clinical data groups for electronic medical record in China, http:", 10.1007, pp.s10916-010-9540-x, J Med Syst[DOI]
- Chen W, "Diagnostics, version 7" (2008), Health Press
- "Technology solution of establishing hospital information platform for electronic health record in China" (2011)[URL]
- "Logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINCⓇ) users' guide" (2011)[URL]
- "Metadata online registry" (2011)[URL]
- IEC international standard, information technologymetadata registries (MDR). Part 3, registry meta model and basic attributes, "ISO", pp.2011, International Organization for Standardization
- Johnson SB, "An electronic health record based on structured narrative", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 15, pp.54~64 (2008)
- Jian WS, "Building a portable data and information interoperability infrastructure-framework for a standard Taiwan electronic medical record template", Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 88, pp.102~111 (2007)
- Sleszynski SL, "Standardized medical record: a new outpatient osteopathic SOAP note form: validation of a standardized office form against physician's progress notes", J Am Osteopath Assoc, 99, pp.516~529 (1999)
- Aghili H, "Progress notes model", Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp, pp.12~16 (1997)