Effectiveness of Nursing Management Information Systems: A Systematic Review
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review evaluation studies of nursing management information systems (NMISs) and their outcome measures to examine system effectiveness. Methods: For the systematic review, a literature search of the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to retrieve original articles published between 1970 and 2014. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms included informatics, medical informatics, nursing informatics, medical informatics application, and management information systems for information systems and evaluation studies and nursing evaluation research for evaluation research. Additionally, manag* and admin*, and nurs* were combined. Title, abstract, and full-text reviews were completed by two reviewers. And then, year, author, type of management system, study purpose, study design, data source, system users, study subjects, and outcomes were extracted from the selected articles. The quality and risk of bias of the studies that were finally selected were assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS) criteria. Results: Out of the 2,257 retrieved articles, a total of six articles were selected. These included two scheduling programs, two nursing cost-related programs, and two patient care management programs. For the outcome measurements, usefulness, time saving, satisfaction, cost, attitude, usability, data quality/completeness/accuracy, and personnel work patterns were included. User satisfaction, time saving, and usefulness mostly showed positive findings. Conclusions: The study results suggest that NMISs were effective in time saving and useful in nursing care. Because there was a lack of quality in the reviewed studies, well-designed research, such as randomized controlled trials, should be conducted to more objectively evaluate the effectiveness of NMISs.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review evaluation studies of nursing management information systems (NMISs) and their outcome measures to examine system effectiveness. Methods: For the systematic review, a literature search of the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to retrieve original articles published between 1970 and 2014. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms included informatics, medical informatics, nursing informatics, medical informatics application, and management information systems for information systems and evaluation studies and nursing evaluation research for evaluation research. Additionally, manag* and admin*, and nurs* were combined. Title, abstract, and full-text reviews were completed by two reviewers. And then, year, author, type of management system, study purpose, study design, data source, system users, study subjects, and outcomes were extracted from the selected articles. The quality and risk of bias of the studies that were finally selected were assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS) criteria. Results: Out of the 2,257 retrieved articles, a total of six articles were selected. These included two scheduling programs, two nursing cost-related programs, and two patient care management programs. For the outcome measurements, usefulness, time saving, satisfaction, cost, attitude, usability, data quality/completeness/accuracy, and personnel work patterns were included. User satisfaction, time saving, and usefulness mostly showed positive findings. Conclusions: The study results suggest that NMISs were effective in time saving and useful in nursing care. Because there was a lack of quality in the reviewed studies, well-designed research, such as randomized controlled trials, should be conducted to more objectively evaluate the effectiveness of NMISs.
참고문헌 (21)
- Tillett J, "Determining the value of nursing care", J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 25(1), pp.6~7 (2011)
- Skytt B, "The roles of the first-line nurse manager: perceptions from four perspectives", J Nurs Manag, 16(8), pp.1012~1020 (2008)
- Surakka T, "The nurse manager's work in the hospital environment during the 1990s and 2000s: responsibility, accountability and expertise in nursing leadership", J Nurs Manag, 16(5), pp.525~534 (2008)
- Junttila K, "Silvennoinen L. Data warehouse approach to nursing management", J Nurs Manag, 15(2), pp.155~161 (2007)
- Lammintakanen J, "Use of electronic information systems in nursing management", Int J Med Inform, 79(5), pp.324~331 (2010)
- Ruland CM, "Usefulness and effects on costs and staff management of a nursing resource management information system", J Nurs Manag, 11(3), pp.208~215 (2003)
- Friedman CP, "Evaluation methods in medical informatics" (2006), Springer
- Burkle T, "Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot?", J Eval Clin Pract, 7(4), pp.373~385 (2001)
- Hlusko DL, "Computerization of a nursing financial management system using continuous quality improvement as a framework", Comput Nurs, 12(4), pp.193~200 (1994)
- Heslop L, "Nurse staff allocation by nurse patient ratio vs. a computerized nurse dependency management system: a comparative cost analysis of Australian and New Zealand hospitals", Nurs Econ, 30(6), pp.347~355 (2012)
- Bailyn L, "Self-scheduling for hospital nurses: an attempt and its difficulties", J Nurs Manag, 15(1), pp.72~77 (2007)
- Madrid EM, "Perioperative system design and evaluation", Semin Perioper Nurs, 6(2), pp.94~101 (1997)
- "DAMI & RoBANS version 2.0" (2013)[URL]
- Kaplan B, "Evaluating informatics applications: some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism", Int J Med Inform, 64(1), pp.39~56 (2001)
- Oroviogoicoechea C, "Review:evaluating information systems in nursing", J Clin Nurs, 17(5), pp.567~575 (2008)
- Currie LM, "Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics", Int J Med Inform, 74(11-12), pp.908~916 (2005)
- Ammenwerth E, "Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck", Int J Med Inform, 73(6), pp.479~491 (2004)
- Ammenwerth E, "An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002", Methods Inf Med, 44(1), pp.44~56 (2005)
- Van Der Meijden MJ, "Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 10(3), pp.235~243 (2003)
- Friedman CP, "Is medical informatics a mature science? A review of measurement practice in outcome studies of clinical systems", Int J Med Inform, 69(2-3), pp.261~272 (2003)
- Nahm ES, "Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation:a practical guide", Nurs Outlook, 55(6), pp.282~288 (2007)