본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Validity of Principal Diagnoses in Discharge Summaries and ICD-10 Coding Assessments Based on National Health Data of Thailand

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: This study examined the validity of the principal diagnoses on discharge summaries and coding assessments. Methods: Data were collected from the National Health Security Office (NHSO) of Thailand in 2015. In total, 118,971 medical records were audited. The sample was drawn from government hospitals and private hospitals covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand. Hospitals and cases were selected using NHSO criteria. The validity of the principal diagnoses listed in the “Summary and Coding Assessment” forms was established by comparing data from the discharge summaries with data obtained from medical record reviews, and additionally, by comparing data from the coding assessments with data in the computerized ICD (the data base used for reimbursement-purposes). Results: The summary assessments had low sensitivities (7.3%–37.9%), high specificities (97.2%–99.8%), low positive predictive values (9.2%–60.7%), and high negative predictive values (95.9%–99.3%). The coding assessments had low sensitivities (31.1%–69.4%), high specificities (99.0%–99.9%), moderate positive predictive values (43.8%–89.0%), and high negative predictive values (97.3%–99.5%). The discharge summaries and codings often contained mistakes, particularly the categories “Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases”, “Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified”, “Factors influencing health status and contact with health services”, and “Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes”. Conclusions: The validity of the principal diagnoses on the summary and coding assessment forms was found to be low. The training of physicians and coders must be strengthened to improve the validity of discharge summaries and codings.

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the validity of the principal diagnoses on discharge summaries and coding assessments. Methods: Data were collected from the National Health Security Office (NHSO) of Thailand in 2015. In total, 118,971 medical records were audited. The sample was drawn from government hospitals and private hospitals covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand. Hospitals and cases were selected using NHSO criteria. The validity of the principal diagnoses listed in the “Summary and Coding Assessment” forms was established by comparing data from the discharge summaries with data obtained from medical record reviews, and additionally, by comparing data from the coding assessments with data in the computerized ICD (the data base used for reimbursement-purposes). Results: The summary assessments had low sensitivities (7.3%–37.9%), high specificities (97.2%–99.8%), low positive predictive values (9.2%–60.7%), and high negative predictive values (95.9%–99.3%). The coding assessments had low sensitivities (31.1%–69.4%), high specificities (99.0%–99.9%), moderate positive predictive values (43.8%–89.0%), and high negative predictive values (97.3%–99.5%). The discharge summaries and codings often contained mistakes, particularly the categories “Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases”, “Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified”, “Factors influencing health status and contact with health services”, and “Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes”. Conclusions: The validity of the principal diagnoses on the summary and coding assessment forms was found to be low. The training of physicians and coders must be strengthened to improve the validity of discharge summaries and codings.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. National Health Security Office, "National Health Security Act B.E. 2545 (A.D. 2002)", National Health Security Office, ~ (2002)
  2. Quan H, "International variation in the definition of ‘main condition’ in ICD-coded health data", Int J Qual Health Care, 26(5), pp.511~515 (2014)
  3. Pongpirul K, "Coding audit for in-patient reimbursement of the National Health Security Office", J Health Syst Res, 2(4), pp.535~545 (2008)
  4. Apiwachaneewong S, "Quality of inpatient records related to diagnosis related group in Changwat Kamphaengphet", J Health Sci, 15(5), pp.730~739 (2005)
  5. Pongpirul K, "A qualitative study of DRG coding practice in hospitals under the Thai Universal Coverage scheme", BMC Health Serv Res, 11, pp.71~ (2011)
  6. Pongpirul K, "DRG coding practice : a nationwide hospital survey in Thailand", BMC Health Serv Res, 11, pp.290~ (2011)
  7. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision (ICD-10), "World Health Organization", World Health Organization, ~ (2016)
  8. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision Thai modification (ICD-10-TM):standard cording guideline, "Thailand Ministry of Public Health", Ministry of Public Health, ~ (2014)
  9. Bonita R, "Basic epidemiology" (2007), World Health Organization
  10. Karkhaneh M, "Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10", Inj Prev, 18(2), pp.88~93 (2012)
  11. Chen G, "Validating ICD coding algorithms for diabetes mellitus from administrative data", Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 89(2), pp.189~195 (2010)
  12. Thomsen RW, "Validity and underrecording of diagnosis of COPD in the Danish National Patient Registry", Respir Med, 105(7), pp.1063~1068 (2011)
  13. Jolley RJ, "Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data", BMJ Open, 5(12), pp.e009487~ (2015)
  14. Quan H, "Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database", Health Serv Res, 43(4), pp.1424~1441 (2008)
  15. Patel AB, "Validity and utility of ICD-10administrative health data for identifying ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on physician chart review", CMAJ Open, 3(4), pp.E413~E418 (2015)
  16. O’Malley KJ, "Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy", Health Serv Res, 40(5 Pt 2), pp.1620~1639 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

코딩시뮬레이션을 이용한 의사 및 심사간호사와 의무기록사의 질병코딩 차이 연구이영, 강길원, 배순옥, 부유경, 최해선, 최혜영한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2015 · 제40권 제3호우리나라 의료기관의 질병 코딩 불일치성 분석 : 외래환자 건강보험 청구 자료를 중심으로강길원, 전윤희한국디지털정책학회 · 디지털융복합연구2018 · 제16권 제12호Level of Agreement and Factors Associated With Discrepancies Between Nationwide Medical History Questionnaires and Hospital Claims Data강희진, 김연용, 박종헌, 신순애, 이은주, 하성준대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2017 · 제50권 제5호Validity of the diagnosis of diabetic microvascular complications in Korean national health insurance claim dataHyung Jun Kim, Jee-Eun Kim, Moo-Seok Park, Tae Jin Song대한임상신경생리학회 · Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology2022 · 제24권 제1호Reliability and Validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for Public Hospitals in Korea신의철, 이창우, Clara Lee, Stella Jung-Hyun Kim대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2019 · 제52권 제5호Comparison between the International Classification of Primary Care and the International Classification of Diseases Classifications in Primary Care in Korea심재용, 안정훈, 황진섭, Jangmi Yang, Jimin Kim, Mi-Ra Cho, Shin-Hye Kim, Yu-Jin Kwon대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2022 · 제43권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)