해적과 약탈경제 - 중세 일본 해적을 중심으로 -
The Pirate and The Plunder Economy - Focusing on the Japanese Pirate in Medieval Period -
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the Japanese Islands, the pirate is active from the 8th century to the 16th century in the coast along an inland of Seto. They were the trader and the plunderer in the Japanese Islands. The Japanese pirate was not a resistant against the political power but a sea trade. The expansion of the Japanese pirate in Medieval Period was related to the social-political disorder Kamakura shogunate and signified the increasing of pirate and the expansion of piracy. Therefore, Their activity is the plunder economy. Because of the appearance of pirate, the discord and the hostile was formed between Joseon Kingdom and Japan. The activity of pirate elevated the importance of sea in the coast of East-Asia while the development of navigation and shipbuilding disappear the pirate. The Japanese pirate stood in the crossing of antiforeign feeling between Korea and Japan. The Japanese pirate brought about the restlessness of popular feelings, the financial difficulty and the crisis of national existence. Then, the looted goods which needed at the Japanese Islands in Koryo Kingdom period passed the buck to Joseon Kingdom. An appeasement measure policy alleviated the economical burden of looted goods. Reception expenses in 『Haedongjekukki』 and 『Kyeongkudaejeon』 accorded with the quantity of cereal that plundered in Koryo Kingdom. Consequently, the Japanese pirate and the plunder economy meant the identity of Japanese pirate.
Abstract
In the Japanese Islands, the pirate is active from the 8th century to the 16th century in the coast along an inland of Seto. They were the trader and the plunderer in the Japanese Islands. The Japanese pirate was not a resistant against the political power but a sea trade. The expansion of the Japanese pirate in Medieval Period was related to the social-political disorder Kamakura shogunate and signified the increasing of pirate and the expansion of piracy. Therefore, Their activity is the plunder economy. Because of the appearance of pirate, the discord and the hostile was formed between Joseon Kingdom and Japan. The activity of pirate elevated the importance of sea in the coast of East-Asia while the development of navigation and shipbuilding disappear the pirate. The Japanese pirate stood in the crossing of antiforeign feeling between Korea and Japan. The Japanese pirate brought about the restlessness of popular feelings, the financial difficulty and the crisis of national existence. Then, the looted goods which needed at the Japanese Islands in Koryo Kingdom period passed the buck to Joseon Kingdom. An appeasement measure policy alleviated the economical burden of looted goods. Reception expenses in 『Haedongjekukki』 and 『Kyeongkudaejeon』 accorded with the quantity of cereal that plundered in Koryo Kingdom. Consequently, the Japanese pirate and the plunder economy meant the identity of Japanese pirate.
참고문헌 (24)
- 연세대학교동방학연구소, "高麗史" (1961)
- 국사편찬위원회, "朝鮮王朝實錄" (1973)
- 続群書類従完成会, "靑方文書" (1986)
- 新日本古典文學大系, "今昔物語集" (1993), 岩波書店
- 國書刊行會, "明月記" (1969)
- 國書刊行會, "吾妻鏡" (1943)
- 鎌倉幕府法, "中世法制史料集" (1969), 岩波書店
- 吉川弘文館, "百鍊抄" (2000)
- 田中健夫, "中世海賊史の硏究動向", 中世海外交涉史の硏究, pp.257~260 (1957), 東京大學出版會
- 田中健夫, "倭寇と東アジア通交圈", 日本の社會史, 1, pp.155~156 (1987), 岩波書店
- 田村洋幸, "中世日朝貿易の硏究", pp.73~ (1967), 三和書房
- 太田弘毅, "倭寇と結託した朝鮮人 - <賊諜>․<奸民>․<詐倭> -", 藝林, 36(3), pp.2~24 (1987)
- 高橋公明, "中世東アジア海域における海民と交流", 名古屋大學文學部硏究論集, 33, pp.1~20 (1987)
- 佐伯弘次, "海賊論", アジアのなかの日本史(Ⅲ. 海上の道), pp.38~ (1992), 東京大學出版會
- 李領, "高麗末期 倭寇構成員에 관한 考察", 한일관계사연구, 5, pp.13~14 (1996)
- 김보한, "東아시아 經濟 圈域에 있어서 약탈의 주역, 海賊과 倭寇 - 10~13세기 日本의 海賊과 倭寇를 중심으로 -", 중국사연구, 29(29), pp.145~170 (2004), 중국사학회
- 金普漢, "一揆와 倭寇", 日本歷史硏究, 10, pp.54~55 (1999)
- 瀨野精一郞, "鎭西御家人の硏究", pp.459~ (1974), 吉川弘文館
- 山內讓, "海賊と海城", pp.1~221 (1997), 平凡社
- 金谷匡人, "海賊たちの中世", pp.1~205 (1998), 吉川弘文館
- 佐藤和夫, "日本中世水軍の硏究-梶原氏とその時代-", pp.1~418 (2004), 錦正社
- 田中健夫, "倭寇 - 海の歷史 -", pp.1~240 (1982), 敎育社
- 太田弘毅, "倭寇-日本あふれ活動史-", pp.1~599 (2004), 文藝社
- Zou Keyuan, "Piracy at sea and China's response in : Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly", pp.364~ (2000), Lloyd's of London Press
