본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자간호기록 적용 전ㆍ후 환자의 간호기록 비교: 복식자궁절제술 환자를 중심으로

A Comparison of the Nursing Records of Hysterectomy Patients: Pre and Post Implementation of an ICNP Based Electronic Nursing Record System

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: This study compared the abilities of electronic nursing records, which are based on standard nursing terminology, and paper-based nursing records to support the nursing process. Methods: The nursing records of 38 pairs of inpatients admitted to a gynecology nursing unit were selected. The data from the paper records were obtained manually by a chart review as single statement units. The electronic records were extracted from a computerized system. The statements were categorized using the NANDA diagnosis and the modified Clinical Care Classification. Based on a semantic analysis of the components of the nursing process, the completeness of the nursing records was classified into complete and incomplete patterns according to the presence and relevancy of the assessment, the diagnosis, the intervention and the outcome. Results: The numbers of nursing diagnoses used and the unique nursing diagnoses were both higher in the electronic records than those in the paper records. The number of statements of nursing assessments/outcomes, and nursing interventions was 1.4-fold higher in the electronic records than that in the paper records respectively. The proportion of complete patterns of the nursing process was 3.4% in the paper records and 25.7% in the electronic records. Conclusion: These results suggest that electronic records are better than paper records to support the nursing process in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of nursing documentation.

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the abilities of electronic nursing records, which are based on standard nursing terminology, and paper-based nursing records to support the nursing process. Methods: The nursing records of 38 pairs of inpatients admitted to a gynecology nursing unit were selected. The data from the paper records were obtained manually by a chart review as single statement units. The electronic records were extracted from a computerized system. The statements were categorized using the NANDA diagnosis and the modified Clinical Care Classification. Based on a semantic analysis of the components of the nursing process, the completeness of the nursing records was classified into complete and incomplete patterns according to the presence and relevancy of the assessment, the diagnosis, the intervention and the outcome. Results: The numbers of nursing diagnoses used and the unique nursing diagnoses were both higher in the electronic records than those in the paper records. The number of statements of nursing assessments/outcomes, and nursing interventions was 1.4-fold higher in the electronic records than that in the paper records respectively. The proportion of complete patterns of the nursing process was 3.4% in the paper records and 25.7% in the electronic records. Conclusion: These results suggest that electronic records are better than paper records to support the nursing process in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of nursing documentation.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Carpenito-Moyet LJ, "Nursing care plans and documentation. 4th ed", pp.3~26 (2004), Williams & Wilkins
  2. Chi SA, "A basic study on improvement and computerization of nursing record", J Korean Acad Nurs, 29(1), pp.21~33 (1999)
  3. Park HA, "Development of nursing information system component and interface model for integrated medical information system", pp.31~66 (2003), Ministry of Health and Welfare
  4. North America Nursing Diagnosis Association, "Nursing Diagnosis: Definition and Classifications 2001-2002", pp.13~207 (2001)
  5. Carpenito-Moyet LJ, "Nursing Diagnosis. Application to clinical practice. 10th ed", pp.80~938 (2004), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  6. Seoul National University Hospital, "Clinical nursing process application as based on ENR", pp.33~884 (2007), Hyunmoon Press
  7. Saba V, "Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual", pp.103~240 (2007), Springer Publishing Company
  8. Nursing Text Society for the Research of Women's Health, "Women's Health Nursing I, II", pp.1108~1120 (2006), Soomoonsa
  9. Seoul National University Hospital, "Nursing Diagnosis and Planning", pp.335~350 (1994), Seoul National University Press
  10. Lee KH, "Women's Health Nursing I, II", pp.1342~1358 (2003), Hyunmoon Press
  11. 조인숙, "ICNP 활용 전자간호기록 시스템을 위한 수작업 간호기록내용 분석: 모성간호기록을 중심으로", Healthcare Informatics Research, 8(3), pp.1~13 (2002), 대한의료정보학회
  12. Myung HJ, "Analysis of nursing notes to develop an ICNP-based electronic nursing records system-Focused on general surgery patients' nursing records", 박사, pp.2003
  13. Kim YJ, "Analysis of nursing records of cardiac-surgery patients based on the nursing process and focusing on nursing outcomes", Int J Med Inform, 74(11), pp.952~959 (2003)
  14. "The 7-axis model of version 1(chap 4)"[URL]
  15. Park SA, "Development of computerized program for nursing diagnosis and Intervention linked to medical diagnosis", J Korean Nurs Adm Acad Soc, 8(2), pp.239~248 (2002)
  16. Cho I, "Development and evaluation of a terminology-based electronic nursing record system", J Biomed Inform, 36(4), pp.304~312 (2003)
  17. Cho I, "Evaluation of the expressiveness of an ICNP-based nursing data dictionary in a computerized nursing record system", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13(4), pp.456~464 (2006)
  18. Park HA, "Nursing diagnosis, intervention, outcome classification", pp.5~24 (2000), Seoul National University Press
  19. American Nursing Association, "Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice", pp.1~15 (2008), Silver Spring
  20. Song MS, "Comparison of nusing activities reflected in nursing notes and in-depth interviews of nurses in an acute hospital", J Korean Acad Nurs, 33(6), pp.802~811 (2003)
  21. Bakken S, "Standardized terminologies for nursing concepts: collaborative activities in the United States", 7th International Congress Nursing Informatics : One Step Beyond: The Evolution of Technology and Nursing: proceedings of the NI 2000 Post Congress Workshop, pp.21~32 (2000), International Medical Informatics Association
  22. Hardiker NR, "Formal nursing terminology systems: a means to an end", J Biomed Inform, 35(5), pp.298~305 (2002)
  23. Hardiker NR, "Standards for nursing terminology", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 7(6), pp.523~528 (2000)
  24. Gabrieli ER, "Longitudinal electronic patient records: a challenge of our time", Computers in Nursing, 15(2), pp.S48~S52 (1997)
  25. Marin HF, "Building standard-based nursing information systems. Pan American Health Organization", pp.12~15 (2001), World Health Organization
  26. Larrabee JH, "Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital", Computers in Nursing, 19(2), pp.56~68 (2001)
  27. Nahm R, "Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction", Comuters in Nursing, 18(5), pp.220~229 (2000)
  28. Smith K, "Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation", CIN:Comput Inform Nurs, 23(3), pp.132~138 (2005)
  29. Lee CH, "A study on the effects of EMR on nursing documentation", J Korean Soc Med Inform, 6(4), pp.87~97 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)