Dasan’s Metacritique on the Seongni Debate in Joseon Neo-Confucianism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article defines Dasan’s view on the Seongni debate as “metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy is often dubbed the “philosophy of philosophy” or “second-order philosophy.” The word “meta” has Greek origins, meaning “after” or “beyond.” A metaphilosopher stays outside of an ongoing philosophical debate or problem and conducts a second-order review of its nature, purpose, and method, instead of being directly involved in the debate. If a metaphilosopher is defined as such, Dasan, then, can be regarded as the first and foremost metaphilosopher in the Neo-Confucian history of Joseon. Instead of engaging in the intense Seongni debate of his time as a participant, he remained outside the debate and criticized its nature, goals, and methodology from a second-order perspective. As a metaphilosopher, Dasan employed methodological tools, such as linguistic analysis. This article analyzes Dasan’s metaphilosophical stance on the Seongni debate and concludes that his metaphilosophical perspective provided a turning point in the history of Joseon Neo-Confucianism.
Abstract
This article defines Dasan’s view on the Seongni debate as “metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy is often dubbed the “philosophy of philosophy” or “second-order philosophy.” The word “meta” has Greek origins, meaning “after” or “beyond.” A metaphilosopher stays outside of an ongoing philosophical debate or problem and conducts a second-order review of its nature, purpose, and method, instead of being directly involved in the debate. If a metaphilosopher is defined as such, Dasan, then, can be regarded as the first and foremost metaphilosopher in the Neo-Confucian history of Joseon. Instead of engaging in the intense Seongni debate of his time as a participant, he remained outside the debate and criticized its nature, goals, and methodology from a second-order perspective. As a metaphilosopher, Dasan employed methodological tools, such as linguistic analysis. This article analyzes Dasan’s metaphilosophical stance on the Seongni debate and concludes that his metaphilosophical perspective provided a turning point in the history of Joseon Neo-Confucianism.
참고문헌 (14)
- Yi, Hwang, "退溪集", ~
- Jeong, Yak-yong, "詩文集", ~
- Jeong, Yak-yong, "與猶堂全書", ~
- Jeong, Yak-yong, "中庸講義補", ~
- Jeong, Yak-yong, "心經密驗", ~ (1815)
- Brandt, Richard, "Ethical Theory" (1959), Prentice-Hall
- Brandt, Richard, "A Theory of the Good and the Right" (1979), Oxford University Press
- Firth, Richard, "Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 123 (1952)
- Harman, Gilbert, "The Nature of Morality" (1977), Oxford University Press
- Kim, Young-woo, "A Study of Dasan’s Conception of the Four Beginnings and the Seven Feelings", Journal of Dasan Studies, 6 (2005)
- Lee, Seung-Hwan, "An Analysis of the Moral Sensibility of Public Officers in Zhu Xi’s Metaphysics", Journal of Asian Philosophy in Korea, 10 (1998)
- 이승환, "성리학의 기호 배치방식과 조선유학의 분기", 동양철학연구, 70(70), pp.125~157 (2012), 동양철학연구회[DOI]
- 이승환, "퇴계의 ‘횡설’과 고봉의 ‘수설' - 프레임의 차이로 보는 조선유학의 분기(分岐)", 퇴계학보, 131(131), pp.39~82 (2012), 퇴계학연구원
- Lee, Seung-Hwan, "Seong Hon’s “Horizontal Frame” and Yi I’s “Vertical Frame”", Study of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 48 (2012)
