본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Protected Health Information Recognition by Fine-Tuning a Pre-training Transformer Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: De-identifying protected health information (PHI) in medical documents is important, and a prerequisite to deidentificationis the identification of PHI entity names in clinical documents. This study aimed to compare the performanceof three pre-training models that have recently attracted significant attention and to determine which model is more suitablefor PHI recognition. Methods: We compared the PHI recognition performance of deep learning models using the i2b2 2014dataset. We used the three pre-training models—namely, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT),robustly optimized BERT pre-training approach (RoBERTa), and XLNet (model built based on Transformer-XL)—to detectPHI. After the dataset was tokenized, it was processed using an inside-outside-beginning tagging scheme and WordPiecetokenizedto place it into these models. Further, the PHI recognition performance was investigated using BERT, RoBERTa,and XLNet. Results: Comparing the PHI recognition performance of the three models, it was confirmed that XLNet had asuperior F1-score of 96.29%. In addition, when checking PHI entity performance evaluation, RoBERTa and XLNet showeda 30% improvement in performance compared to BERT. Conclusions: Among the pre-training models used in this study,XLNet exhibited superior performance because word embedding was well constructed using the two-stream self-attentionmethod. In addition, compared to BERT, RoBERTa and XLNet showed superior performance, indicating that they were moreeffective in grasping the context.

Abstract

Objectives: De-identifying protected health information (PHI) in medical documents is important, and a prerequisite to deidentificationis the identification of PHI entity names in clinical documents. This study aimed to compare the performanceof three pre-training models that have recently attracted significant attention and to determine which model is more suitablefor PHI recognition. Methods: We compared the PHI recognition performance of deep learning models using the i2b2 2014dataset. We used the three pre-training models—namely, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT),robustly optimized BERT pre-training approach (RoBERTa), and XLNet (model built based on Transformer-XL)—to detectPHI. After the dataset was tokenized, it was processed using an inside-outside-beginning tagging scheme and WordPiecetokenizedto place it into these models. Further, the PHI recognition performance was investigated using BERT, RoBERTa,and XLNet. Results: Comparing the PHI recognition performance of the three models, it was confirmed that XLNet had asuperior F1-score of 96.29%. In addition, when checking PHI entity performance evaluation, RoBERTa and XLNet showeda 30% improvement in performance compared to BERT. Conclusions: Among the pre-training models used in this study,XLNet exhibited superior performance because word embedding was well constructed using the two-stream self-attentionmethod. In addition, compared to BERT, RoBERTa and XLNet showed superior performance, indicating that they were moreeffective in grasping the context.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 박영택, "Clinical Decision Support Functions and Digitalization of Clinical Documents of Electronic Medical Record Systems", Healthcare Informatics Research, 25(2), pp.115~123 (2019), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
  2. Choi YI, "Development of machine learning model to predict the 5-year risk of starting biologic agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) : K-CDM network study", J Clin Med, 9(11), pp.3427~ (2020)
  3. Seong D, "Research trends in clinical natural language processing", Commun Korean Inst Inf Sci Eng, 35(5), pp.20~26 (2017)
  4. 신수용, "Privacy Protection and Data Utilization", Healthcare Informatics Research, 27(1), pp.1~2 (2021), 대한의료정보학회
  5. "Health Information Privacy Beyond HIPAA: A 2018Environmental Scan of Major Trends and Challenges" (2017)[URL]
  6. Soo-Yong Shin, "A De-identification Method for Bilingual Clinical Texts of Various Note Types", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(1), pp.7~15 (2015), 대한의학회
  7. Lafferty J, "Conditional random fields : probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning(ICML), pp.282~289 (2001)
  8. Wang Y, "Annotating and recognising named entities in clinical notes", Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009Student Research Workshop, pp.18~26 (2009)
  9. Dreyfus SE, "Artificial neural networks, back propagation, and the Kelley-Bryson gradient procedure", J Guid Control Dyn, 13(5), pp.926~928 (1990)
  10. "Recurrent neural network (RNN) tutorial, Part 1" (2015)[URL]
  11. Hochreiter S, "Long short-term memory", Neural Comput, 9(8), pp.1735~1780 (1997)
  12. Liu Z, "Entity recognition from clinical texts via recurrent neural network", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 17(Suppl 2), pp.67~ (2017)
  13. "Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space" (2013)[URL]
  14. "fastText" (2020)[URL]
  15. "Deep contextualized word representations" (2018)[URL]
  16. 김정미, "Word2vec을 활용한 RNN기반의 문서 분류에 관한 연구", 한국지능시스템학회 논문지, 27(6), pp.560~565 (2017), 한국지능시스템학회
  17. Stubbs A, "Automated systems for the de-identification of longitudinal clinical narratives:overview of 2014 i2b2", UTHealth shared task Track 1, 2014, pp.58(Suppl(Suppl)), S11~S19
  18. "n2c2 NLP Research Data Sets" (2019)[URL]
  19. "BERT: pretraining of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding" (2018)[URL]
  20. Lan Z, "ALBERT: a lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations", Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2020)
  21. "ROBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach" (2019)[URL]
  22. "deepset/roberta-base-squad2" (2020)[URL]
  23. "Adam: a method for stochastic optimization" (2014)[URL]
  24. Yang Z, "Xlnet : generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding", Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 32, pp.5754~5764 (2019)
  25. "xlnet-base-cased" (2019)[URL]
  26. Warby SC, "Sleep-spindle detection : crowdsourcing and evaluating performance of experts, non-experts and automated methods", Nat Methods, 11(4), pp.385~392 (2014)
  27. 김용운, "Trends in Research on the Security of Medical Information in Korea: Focused on Information Privacy Security in Hospitals", Healthcare Informatics Research, 24(1), pp.61~68 (2018), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
  28. "Auto-encoding variational bayes" (2013)[URL]
  29. Goodfellow I, "Generative adversarial nets", Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 27, pp.2672~2680 (2014)
  30. "Publicly available clinical BERT embeddings" (2019)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)