본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Satisfaction of Patients and Physicians with Telehealth Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed significant challenges to healthcare systems, prompting the widespread adoption of telehealth to provide medical services while minimizing the risk of virus transmission. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction rates of both patients and physicians with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Searches were conducted in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2023. We included studies that utilized telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and reported satisfaction data for both patients and physicians. Data extraction was performed using a form designed by the researchers. A meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models with the OpenMeta-Analyst software. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of telehealth services used: telephone, video, and a combination of both. Results: From an initial pool of 1,454 articles, 62 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The most commonly used methods were video and telephone calls. The overall satisfaction rate with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was 81%. Satisfaction rates were higher among patients at 83%, compared to 74% among physicians. Specifically, telephone consultations had a satisfaction rate of 77%, video consultations 86%, and a mix of both methods yielded a 77% satisfaction rate. Conclusions: Overall, satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was considered satisfactory, with both patients and physicians reporting high levels of satisfaction. Telehealth has proven to be an effective alternative for delivering healthcare services during pandemics.

Abstract

Objectives: The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed significant challenges to healthcare systems, prompting the widespread adoption of telehealth to provide medical services while minimizing the risk of virus transmission. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction rates of both patients and physicians with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Searches were conducted in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2023. We included studies that utilized telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and reported satisfaction data for both patients and physicians. Data extraction was performed using a form designed by the researchers. A meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models with the OpenMeta-Analyst software. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of telehealth services used: telephone, video, and a combination of both. Results: From an initial pool of 1,454 articles, 62 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The most commonly used methods were video and telephone calls. The overall satisfaction rate with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was 81%. Satisfaction rates were higher among patients at 83%, compared to 74% among physicians. Specifically, telephone consultations had a satisfaction rate of 77%, video consultations 86%, and a mix of both methods yielded a 77% satisfaction rate. Conclusions: Overall, satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was considered satisfactory, with both patients and physicians reporting high levels of satisfaction. Telehealth has proven to be an effective alternative for delivering healthcare services during pandemics.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Gilbert AW, "Rapid implementation of virtual clinics due to COVID-19 : report and early evaluation of a quality improvement initiative", BMJ Open Qual, 9(2), pp.e000985~ (2020)[DOI]
  2. Gentry MT, "Clinician satisfaction with rapid adoption and implementation of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic", Telemed J E Health, 27(12), pp.1385~1392 (2021)[DOI]
  3. Andrews E, "Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19 : an integrative review", Int J Nurs Stud Adv, 2, pp.100008~ (2020)[DOI]
  4. Harkey LC, "Patient satisfaction with telehealth in rural settings : a systematic review", Int J Telerehabil, 12(2), pp.53~64 (2020)[DOI]
  5. Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols(PRISMA-P)2015 statement", Syst Rev, 4(1), pp.1~ (2015)[DOI]
  6. Jung AR, "Cognitive intervention using information and communication technology for older adults with mild cognitive impairment : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(21), pp.11535~ (2021)[DOI]
  7. Hadeler E, "Definitions, survey methods, and findings of patient satisfaction studies in teledermatology : a systematic review", Arch Dermatol Res, 313(4), pp.205~215 (2021)[DOI]
  8. Barker TH, "Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability : an overview of methods and the development process", JBI Evid Synth, 21(3), pp.478~493 (2023)[DOI]
  9. Wallace BC, "Meta-Analyst : software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data", BMC Med Res Methodol, 9, pp.80~ (2009)[DOI]
  10. Jackson D, "Extending DerSimonian and Laird’s methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta-analyses", Stat Med, 29(12), pp.1282~1297 (2010)[DOI]
  11. Lin L, "Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta-analysis", J Eval Clin Pract, 26(1), pp.376~384 (2020)[DOI]
  12. Pogorzelska K, "Patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic-a systematic review", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(10), pp.6113~ (2022)[DOI]
  13. Hoff T, "Physician satisfaction with telehealth : a systematic review and agenda for future research", Qual Manag Health Care, 31(3), pp.160~169 (2022)[DOI]
  14. Aashima, "A review of patient satisfaction and experience with telemedicine : a virtual solution during and beyond COVID-19 pandemic", Telemed J E Health, 27(12), pp.1325~1331 (2021)[DOI]
  15. Saiyed S, "Physician perspective and key satisfaction indicators with rapid telehealth adoption during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic", Telemed J E Health, 27(11), pp.1225~1234 (2021)[DOI]
  16. Monaghesh E, "The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak : a systematic review based on current evidence", BMC Public Health, 20(1), pp.1193~ (2020)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Challenges and recommendations in the implementation of audiovisual telemedicine communication: a systematic reviewHardyanto Soebono, Mora Claramita, Ritunga Imelda, Sandra Widaty한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2024 · 제36권 제3호The general public’s perspectives on telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea: analysis of a nationwide survey강은교, 이혜진, Hong Ki Jeong, Hong Yun-Chul, Lee Jin Yong, Yun Jieun한국역학회 · Epidemiology and Health2022 · 제44권 Remote Healthcare Program in Mexico in the Context of the COVID-19 PandemicAdrian H. Heald, Anaya Aguilar Cynthia Jeanet, Armando Mejía Nava, Gabriela Yanet Cortés Moreno, Hilario Ascensión Martinez Arredondo, Ilicia González Mundo, Miguel Félix Mata Rivera, Miguel Jesús Torres Ruiz, Pedro Armando Chaidez Rosales, Rodolfo Lehmann Mendoza대한의료정보학회 · Healthcare Informatics Research2022 · 제28권 제2호Technology and Access to Healthcare with Different Scheduling Systems: A Scoping ReviewLucas Manarte대한의료정보학회 · Healthcare Informatics Research2024 · 제30권 제3호Lessons from Temporary Telemedicine Initiated owing to Outbreak of COVID-19김헌성대한의료정보학회 · Healthcare Informatics Research2020 · 제26권 제2호Analysis of experiences on telemedicine pilot projects from the perspectives of doctors, pharmacists, and patientsHun-Sung Kim, Hyunah Kim, Jeong-Yeon Kim, Min Jung Ko, Seongwoo Seo, Yeryeon Jung, Youseok Kim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2026 · 제41권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)