본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어판 불안한 느낌과 사고에 대한 믿음성 질문지의 심리측정적 특성

Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire (K-BAFT)

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정신과학

초록

Objective : Cognitive fusion, or believability, in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), refers to the tendency to become entangled in one’s thoughts or feelings. It is an important factor in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. However, there is a lack of validated self-report measures for cognitive fusion and defusion, particularly for individuals with anxiety. To address this gap, this study aimed to evaluate the Korean Version of Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire (K-BAFT). Methods : A total of 608 university students and 85 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) took part in this study. They were asked to complete various psychological measures, including the K-BAFT, other measures of ACT processes, and symptom scales. The researchers then analyzed the psychometric characteristics of the K-BAFT. Results : The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the three-factor structure of the K-BAFT, which was reported in the original study, was also found in the university sample. Additionally, both the student and the OCD group demonstrated strong internal consistency (α=0.86 and 0.91, respectively). In the university sample, the K-BAFT showed a strong correlation with the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (rs=0.53, p<0.001). However, it had a weak correlation with symptoms scales for depression, anxiety, and stress (all rs<0.32). Furthermore, the OCD group had higher scores on the K-BAFT compared to the university sample. Conclusion : K-BAFT is considered to be a reliable and valid self-report tool for measuring cognitive fusion with anxious thoughts and feelings. (Anxiety and Mood 2024;20(1):27-34)

Abstract

Objective : Cognitive fusion, or believability, in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), refers to the tendency to become entangled in one’s thoughts or feelings. It is an important factor in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. However, there is a lack of validated self-report measures for cognitive fusion and defusion, particularly for individuals with anxiety. To address this gap, this study aimed to evaluate the Korean Version of Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire (K-BAFT). Methods : A total of 608 university students and 85 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) took part in this study. They were asked to complete various psychological measures, including the K-BAFT, other measures of ACT processes, and symptom scales. The researchers then analyzed the psychometric characteristics of the K-BAFT. Results : The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the three-factor structure of the K-BAFT, which was reported in the original study, was also found in the university sample. Additionally, both the student and the OCD group demonstrated strong internal consistency (α=0.86 and 0.91, respectively). In the university sample, the K-BAFT showed a strong correlation with the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (rs=0.53, p<0.001). However, it had a weak correlation with symptoms scales for depression, anxiety, and stress (all rs<0.32). Furthermore, the OCD group had higher scores on the K-BAFT compared to the university sample. Conclusion : K-BAFT is considered to be a reliable and valid self-report tool for measuring cognitive fusion with anxious thoughts and feelings. (Anxiety and Mood 2024;20(1):27-34)

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Hayes SC, "Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change" (1999), Guilford Press
  2. Linehan MM, "Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder" (1993), Guilford Press
  3. Segal ZV, "Mindfulness based cognitive therapy: theoretical rationale and empirical status" (2004), Guilford Press
  4. Ciarrochi J, "A CBT practitioner’s guide to ACT" (2008), New Harbinger Publications
  5. Hayes SC, "Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies", Behav Ther, 35, pp.638~665 (2004)
  6. Eifert GH, "Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders: a practitioner’s treatment guide to using mindfulness, acceptance, and values-based behavior change strategies" (2005), New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
  7. Luoma JB, "Learning ACT" (2017), Context Press
  8. Hayes SC, "Acceptance and commitment therapy : model, processes and outcomes", Behav Res Ther, 44, pp.1~25 (2006)
  9. Arch JJ, "Longitudinal treatment mediation of traditional cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders", Behav Res Ther, 50, pp.469~478 (2012)
  10. Berghoff CR, "Comparing paths to quality of life : contributions of ACT and cognitive therapy intervention targets in two highly anxious samples", J Context Behav Sci, 3, pp.89~97 (2014)
  11. Naragon-Gainey K, "Structure and validity of measures of decentering and defusion", Psychol Assess, 29, pp.935~954 (2017)
  12. Ruiz FJ, "The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy" (2021), Oxford University Press
  13. Gillanders DT, "The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire", Behav Ther, 45, pp.83~101 (2014)
  14. Benoy C, "Treatment sensitivity : Its importance in the measurement of psychological flexibility", J Context Behav Sci, 13, pp.121~125 (2019)
  15. Ong CW, "A review of AAQ variants and other context-specific measures of psychological flexibility", J Context Behav Sci, 12, pp.329~346 (2019)
  16. Herzberg KN, "The Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire(BAFT) : a psychometric evaluation of cognitive fusion in a nonclinical and highly anxious community sample", Psychol Assess, 24, pp.877~891 (2012)
  17. Zettle RD, "Dysfunctional control by client verbal behavior : the context of reason-giving", Anal Verbal Behav, 4, pp.30~38 (1986)
  18. Mohammadipour M, "A psychometric indices of the Farsi version of the Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire(BAFT)", Int J Ment Health Addiction, 14, pp.752~760 (2016)
  19. Ruiz FJ, "The Spanish version of the believability of anxious feelings and thoughts questionnaire", Psicothema, 26, pp.308~313 (2014)
  20. Lee SW, "A randomized controlled trial of groupbased acceptance and commitment therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder", J Context Behav Sci, 27, pp.45~53 (2023)
  21. Lee SW, "Is Acceptance and commitment therapy effective for any obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions?", Psychitry Investig, 20, pp.991~996 (2023)
  22. Forsyth JP, "The believability of anxious feelings and thoughts questionnaire" (2008)
  23. Bond FW, "Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II : a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance", Behav Ther, 42, pp.676~688 (2011)
  24. Heo J, "Study on the reliability and validity of Korean translated acceptance-action questionnaire-II", Korean J Counsel Psychotherapy, 21, pp.861~878 (2009)
  25. McCracken LM, "The cognitive fusion questionnaire : a preliminary study of psychometric properties and prediction of functioning in chronic pain", Clin J Pain, 30, pp.894~901 (2014)
  26. Kim BO, "Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire", Soc Behav Pers, 43, pp.1715~1724 (2015)
  27. Beck AT, "Beck Depression Inventory-second edition manual", The Psychological Corporation, ~ (1996)
  28. Lee YH, "A study of the reliability and the validity of the BDI, SDS, and MMPI-D scales", Kor J Clin Psychol, 4, pp.561~571 (1991)
  29. Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety : psychometric properties", J Consult Clin Psychol, 56, pp.893~897 (1988)
  30. Yook SP, "A clinical study on the Korean version of Beck Anxiety Inventory : comparative study of patient and non-patient", Korean J Clin Psychol, 16, pp.185~197 (1997)
  31. Cohen S, "A global measure of perceived stress", J Health Soc Behav, 24, pp.385~396 (1983)
  32. Lee J, "The reliability and validity studies of the Korean version of the Perceived Stress Scale", Korean J Psychom Med, 20, pp.127~134 (2012)
  33. Goodman WK, "The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 46, pp.1006~1011 (1989)
  34. Seol SH, "Korean self-report version of the Yalebrown obsessive-compulsive scale : factor structure, reliability, and validity", Psychiatry Investig, 10, pp.17~25 (2013)
  35. Anderson J, "Structural equation modeling in practice : a review and recommended two-step approach", Psychological Bulletin, 103, pp.411~423 (1988)
  36. Schmitt TA, "Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis", J Psychoeduc Assess, 29, pp.304~321 (2011)
  37. Hellberg SN, "Not just thinking, but believing : obsessive beliefs and domains of cognitive fusion in the prediction of OCD symptom dimensions", Clin Psychol Psychother, 27, pp.69~78 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)