본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Should TPP Be Formed? On the Potential Economic, Governance, and Conflict-Reducing Impacts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a free trade agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries whose joint gross domestic products (GDPs) account for 36 percent of world GDP and whose mutual trade accounts for approximately 24 percent of world trade. As for most proposed free trade agreements (FTAs), trade economists have provided ex ante computable general equilibrium (CGE) estimates to predict the trade, employment, and real per capita income effects of this agreement, such as ITC (2016). This paper-intended to complement these studies-examines the potential impacts of TPP beyond such traditional CGE estimates, taking a broader economic, governance, and historical perspective. First, we contrast these traditional CGE trade and welfare estimates that treat all firms within an industry as homogeneous with more recent CGE analyses that allow firms’ productivities to be heterogeneous. We show that the latter models’ trade predictions are much more consistent with ex post empirical evidence of average trade effects of FTAs. Second, empirical evidence now strongly confirms the existence of FTA “contagion.” We review this evidence and show that predictive models of the evolution of FTAs indicate that the TPP should be formed. With China now having formed 12 FTAs and negotiating five new ones (including a sixteen member Asia-Pacific FTA), the United States would likely face considerable trade diversion without the TPP. Third, we examine empirical evidence on the likely further economic growth implications of FTAs by reducing firms’ uncertainty over trade relations and trade policies. Fourth, we examine empirical evidence on the additional impact of FTAs on consolidating democratic institutions in countries. The TPP would likely help consolidate some of the less mature democracies. Fifth, we examine empirical evidence on the reductions of conflicts (and enhanced peace) between countries owing to the formations of FTAs. We conclude the paper noting that the potential net benefits to member countries of the proposed TPP extend well beyond the real income gains to households based upon traditional CGE models.

Abstract

The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a free trade agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries whose joint gross domestic products (GDPs) account for 36 percent of world GDP and whose mutual trade accounts for approximately 24 percent of world trade. As for most proposed free trade agreements (FTAs), trade economists have provided ex ante computable general equilibrium (CGE) estimates to predict the trade, employment, and real per capita income effects of this agreement, such as ITC (2016). This paper-intended to complement these studies-examines the potential impacts of TPP beyond such traditional CGE estimates, taking a broader economic, governance, and historical perspective. First, we contrast these traditional CGE trade and welfare estimates that treat all firms within an industry as homogeneous with more recent CGE analyses that allow firms’ productivities to be heterogeneous. We show that the latter models’ trade predictions are much more consistent with ex post empirical evidence of average trade effects of FTAs. Second, empirical evidence now strongly confirms the existence of FTA “contagion.” We review this evidence and show that predictive models of the evolution of FTAs indicate that the TPP should be formed. With China now having formed 12 FTAs and negotiating five new ones (including a sixteen member Asia-Pacific FTA), the United States would likely face considerable trade diversion without the TPP. Third, we examine empirical evidence on the likely further economic growth implications of FTAs by reducing firms’ uncertainty over trade relations and trade policies. Fourth, we examine empirical evidence on the additional impact of FTAs on consolidating democratic institutions in countries. The TPP would likely help consolidate some of the less mature democracies. Fifth, we examine empirical evidence on the reductions of conflicts (and enhanced peace) between countries owing to the formations of FTAs. We conclude the paper noting that the potential net benefits to member countries of the proposed TPP extend well beyond the real income gains to households based upon traditional CGE models.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Aitken, N. D, "The Effect of EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis", American Economic Review, 63(5), pp.881~892 (1973)
  2. Anderson, J, "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation", American Economic Review, 69(1), pp.106~116 (1979)
  3. Anderson, J., "Non-Tariff Barrier Study Methodology", ~ (2008)
  4. Anderson, J. E., "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.170~192 (2003)
  5. Arkolakis, C., "New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?", American Economic Review, 102(1), pp.94~130 (2012)
  6. Baier, S. L., "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements", Journal of International Economics, 64(1), pp.29~63 (2004)
  7. Baier, S. L, "Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade?", Journal of International Economics, 71(1), pp.72~95 (2007)
  8. Baier, S. L, "Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics", Journal of International Economics, 77(1), pp.63~76 (2009)
  9. Heterogeneous Economic Integration Agreement Effects, "Baier, S. L", Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute, ~, pp.CESifo Working Paper, no. 5488 (2015)
  10. Baier, S. L, "Trade Cooperation", pp.355~373 (2015), Cambridge University Press
  11. Endogenous Trade-Cost Elasticities, Gravity, and Welfare, "Baier, S. L.", University of Notre Dame, ~ (2016)
  12. Baier, S. L., "Do Economic Integration Agreements Actually Work? Issues in Understanding the Causes and Consequences of the Growth of Regionalism", World Economy, 31(4), pp.461~497 (2008)
  13. Baier, S. L., "Economic Integration Agreements and the Margins of International Trade", Journal of International Economics, 93(2), pp.339~350 (2014)
  14. Baier, S. L., "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements Revisited: Distinguishing Sources of Interdependence", Review of International Economics, 22(1), pp.31~58 (2014)
  15. Baldwin, R. E., "Expanding Membership in the European Union" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  16. Baldwin, R. E, "The Causes of Regionalism", World Economy, 20(7), pp.865~888 (1997)
  17. Baldwin, R., "Are Free Trade Agreements Contagious?", Journal of International Economics, 88(1), pp.1~16 (2012)
  18. Bayoumi, T., "Regionalism versus Multilateral Arrangements" (1997), University of Chicago Press
  19. Berden, K., "Non-Tariff Measures in EU-US Trade and Investment: An Economic Analysis" (2009), Ecorys
  20. Bergstrand, J. H, "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence", Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), pp.474~481 (1985)
  21. Bergstrand, J, "The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor Proportions Theory in International Trade", Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), pp.143~153 (1989)
  22. Bergstrand, J, "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-industry Trade", Economic Journal, 100(403), pp.1216~1229 (1990)
  23. Bergstrand, J., "Economic Determinants of the Timing of Preferential Trade Agreement Formations and Enlargements", Economic Inquiry, 54(1), pp.315~341 (2016)
  24. Chen, M. X., "Third-Country Effects on the Formation of Free Trade Agreements", Journal of International Economics, 82(2), pp.238~248 (2010)
  25. The Economics of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Understanding the Alternative Estimates, "Ciuriak, D.", Ciuriak Consulting Inc, ~ (2016)
  26. Costinot, A., "Handbook of International Economics. Volume 4" (2014), Elsevier
  27. Deardorff, A. V., "Partial Equilibrium Estimation of the Effects of Trade Liberalization", presented at the Winter Meeting of the Econometric Society (1974)
  28. Eaton, J., "Technology, Geography and Trade", Econometrica, 70(5), pp.1741~1779 (2002)
  29. Egger, P., "Interdependent Preferential Trade Agreement Memberships: An Empirical Analysis", Journal of International Economics, 76(2), pp.384~399 (2008)
  30. Frankel, J. A., "Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System" (1997), Institute for International Economics
  31. Handley, K, "Exporting under Trade Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Evidence", Journal of International Economics, 94(1), pp.50~66 (2014)
  32. Policy Uncertainty, Trade and Welfare, "Handley, K.", NBER, ~, pp.Working Paper, no. 19376 (2013)
  33. Handley, K, "Trade and Investment under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm Evidence", American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), pp.189~222 (2015)
  34. Head, K., "Handbook of International Economics. Volume 4" (2014), Elsevier
  35. Helpman, E., "Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy" (1985), MIT Press
  36. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors, "ITC", U.S. International Trade Commission, ~ (2016)
  37. Kehoe, T., "Frontiers of Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: In Honor of Herbert Scarf", pp.341~377 (2005), Cambridge University Press
  38. Kehoe, T. J., "How Important is the New Goods Margin in International Trade?", Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), pp.358~392 (2013)
  39. 김성현, "Long-run Effects of the Korea-China Free-Trade Agreement", East Asian Economic Review, 19(2), pp.117~142 (2015), 대외경제정책연구원[DOI]
  40. Limao, N., "Handbook of Commercial Policy" (2016), Elsevier
  41. Linnemann, H., "An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows" (1966), North-Holland Publishing
  42. Liu, X., "Free Trade Agreements and the Consolidation of Democracy", American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(2), pp.29~70 (2014)
  43. Mansfield, E. D., "Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade", American Political Science Review, 94(2), pp.305~321 (2000)
  44. Martin, P., "Civil Wars and International Trade", Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2-3), pp.541~550 (2008)
  45. Martin, P, "Make Trade Not War?", Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), pp.865~900 (2008)
  46. Regional Trade Agreements and the Pacification of Eastern Africa, "Mayer, T.", International Growth Centre, ~ (2016)
  47. Melitz, M. J, "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity", Econometrica, 71(6), pp.1695~1725 (2003)
  48. Melitz, M., "Handbook of International Economics.Volume 4" (2014), Elsevier
  49. The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates, "Petri, P.", Peterson Institute for International Economics, ~, pp.Working Paper 16-2 (2016)
  50. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration, "Petri, P.", East-West Center, ~, pp.Working Papers, Economic Series, no. 119 (2011)
  51. Sapir, A, "Trade Benefits under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences", European Economic Review, 15(3), pp.339~355 (1981)
  52. Shoven, J. B., "On the Computation of Competitive Equilibrium", Journal of International Economics, 4(4), pp.341~354 (1974)
  53. Tinbergen, J., "Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy" (1962), The Twentieth Century Fund
  54. U.S. Congressional Budget Office, "How Preferential Trade Agreements Affect the U.S. Economy" (2016)
  55. Fan Zhai, "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade", Journal of Economic Integration, 23(3), pp.575~604 (2008), 경제통합연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)