A Quantitative Trade Model with Unemployment
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I employ search-and-matching to a multi-country and multi-sector Ricardian model with input-output linkages, trade in intermediate goods, and sectoral heterogeneity, in order to quantify the welfare effects from tariff changes. The paper shows that labor market frictions can be a source of comparative advantage in the sense that better labor market conditions contribute to lower cost in production. Labor market frictions play a critical role in determining the probability of exporting goods to trading partners, and interact with bilateral trade share, price, expenditures, etc. Unemployment and changes in unemployment rates due to tariff reductions contribute welfare changes across countries, implying that welfare effects based on quantitative trade models with full-employment are likely to be biased. I confirm the biased welfare effects by revisiting Caliendo and Parro (2015), who conduct an analysis of the welfare effects from the NAFTA from 1993 to 2005. I show that the welfare gap between theirs and mine has a positive correlation with changes in observed unemployment rates across countries. With the constructed model, I further conduct counterfactual exercises by asking what would happen if China’s tariffs remain unchanged from 2006 to 2015. It turns out that there are mild welfare effects to trading partners in the world trading system.
Abstract
I employ search-and-matching to a multi-country and multi-sector Ricardian model with input-output linkages, trade in intermediate goods, and sectoral heterogeneity, in order to quantify the welfare effects from tariff changes. The paper shows that labor market frictions can be a source of comparative advantage in the sense that better labor market conditions contribute to lower cost in production. Labor market frictions play a critical role in determining the probability of exporting goods to trading partners, and interact with bilateral trade share, price, expenditures, etc. Unemployment and changes in unemployment rates due to tariff reductions contribute welfare changes across countries, implying that welfare effects based on quantitative trade models with full-employment are likely to be biased. I confirm the biased welfare effects by revisiting Caliendo and Parro (2015), who conduct an analysis of the welfare effects from the NAFTA from 1993 to 2005. I show that the welfare gap between theirs and mine has a positive correlation with changes in observed unemployment rates across countries. With the constructed model, I further conduct counterfactual exercises by asking what would happen if China’s tariffs remain unchanged from 2006 to 2015. It turns out that there are mild welfare effects to trading partners in the world trading system.
참고문헌 (27)
- Adao, R., "Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade", American Economic Review, 107(3), pp.633~689 (2017)
- Anderson, J. E., "Gravity with Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.170~192 (2003)
- Arkolakis, C., "New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?", American Economic Review, 102(1), pp.94~130 (2012)
- Armington, P. S., "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production", IMF Staff Papers, 16(1), pp.159~178 (1969)
- Autor, D. H., "The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States", American Economic Review, 103(6), pp.2121~2168 (2013)
- The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade, "Autor, D. H.", NBER, ~, pp.Working Paper, no. 21906 (2016)
- Bernard, A. B., "Plants and Productivity in International Trade", American Economic Review, 93(4), pp.1268~1290 (2003)
- Cacciatore, M., "International Trade and Macroeconomic Dynamics with Labor Market Frictions", Journal of International Economics, 93(1), pp.17~30 (2014)
- Caliendo, L., "Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA", Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), pp.1~44 (2015)
- On the Heterogeneous Effect of Trade on Unemployment, "Carrere, C.", Foundation for Studies and Research on International Development (FERDI), ~, pp.Working Paper, no. P180 (2016)
- Chaney, T., "Distorted Gravity: the Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade", American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1707~1721 (2008)
- Costinot, A., "Handbook of International Economics, vol. 4", pp.197~261 (2014), Elsevier
- Costinot, A., "What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo's Ideas", Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), pp.581~608 (2012)
- Cuñat, A., "Volatility, Labor Market Flexibility, and the Pattern of Comparative Advantage", Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(2), pp.225~254 (2012)
- Davidson, C., "A Model of Globalization and Firm-Worker Matching:How Good is Good Enough?", International Review of Economics and Finance, 23, pp.5~15 (2012)
- Davis, D. R., "Good Jobs, Bad Jobs, and Trade Liberalization", Journal of International Economics, 84(1), pp.26~36 (2011)
- Dekle, R., "Global Rebalancing with Gravity: Measuring the Burden of Adjustment", IMF Staff Papers, 55(3), pp.511~540 (2008)
- Eaton, J., "Technology, Geography and Trade", Econometrica, 70(5), pp.1741~1779 (2002)
- Egger, H., "Firm Heterogeneity and the Labor Market Effects of Trade Liberalization", International Economic Review, 50(1), pp.187~216 (2009)
- Egger, H., "International Welfare and Employment Linkages Arising from Minimum Wages", International Economic Review, 53(3), pp.771~790 (2012)
- Ethier, W., "National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade", American Economic Review, 72(3), pp.389~405 (1982)
- Felbermayr, G., "Globalization and Labor Market Outcomes:Wage Bargaining, Search Frictions, and Firm Heterogeneity", Journal of Economic Theory, 146(1), pp.39~73 (2011)
- Heid, B., "Gravity with Unemployment", Journal of International Economics, 101, pp.70~85 (2016)
- Helpman, E., "Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy", Econometrica, 78(4), pp.1239~1283 (2010)
- Hsieh, C., "A Global View of Productivity Growth in China", Journal of International Economics, 102, pp.209~224 (2016)
- Melitz, M., "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity", Econometrica, 71(6), pp.1695~1725 (2003)
- Rogerson, R., "Search-theoretic Models of the Labor Market:A Survey", Journal of Economic Literature, 43(4), pp.959~988 (2005)