본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Trade Liberalization, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and the Environment: Time Series Evidence from G-20 Economies

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This study examines the dynamic interrelationships between trade, income growth, energy consumption and CO₂ emissions for G-20 economies in a framework of cointegrated vector autoregression (CVAR). Johansen’s maximum likelihood procedure is used to estimate the coefficients of the cointegrated VAR. The results show that trade and income growth have a favorable effect on environmental quality for the developed G-20 member countries, while they have an adverse effect on the environment for the developing member countries. We also find that energy consumption tends to worsen environmental quality for both the developed and developing countries. Finally, it is found that trade and income to emission and energy causality holds for the developed countries; changes in degree of trade openness and income growth lead to corresponding changes in the rates of growth in emission and energy consumption. Emission and energy to trade and income causality, on the other hand, is found to hold for the developing countries; any shocks in emission and energy consumption cause corresponding fluctuations in income growth and trade openness.

Abstract

This study examines the dynamic interrelationships between trade, income growth, energy consumption and CO₂ emissions for G-20 economies in a framework of cointegrated vector autoregression (CVAR). Johansen’s maximum likelihood procedure is used to estimate the coefficients of the cointegrated VAR. The results show that trade and income growth have a favorable effect on environmental quality for the developed G-20 member countries, while they have an adverse effect on the environment for the developing member countries. We also find that energy consumption tends to worsen environmental quality for both the developed and developing countries. Finally, it is found that trade and income to emission and energy causality holds for the developed countries; changes in degree of trade openness and income growth lead to corresponding changes in the rates of growth in emission and energy consumption. Emission and energy to trade and income causality, on the other hand, is found to hold for the developing countries; any shocks in emission and energy consumption cause corresponding fluctuations in income growth and trade openness.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Agras, J, "A Dynamic Approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis", Ecological Economics, 28(2), pp.267~277 (1999)
  2. Akinlo, A. E, "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from 11 African countries", Energy Economics, 30, pp.2391~2400 (2008)
  3. 조용성, "The environmental consequences of globalization: A country-specific time-series analysis", Ecol. Econ., 68, pp.2255~2264, ELSEVIER
  4. Copeland, B. R, "Policy Endogeneity and the Effects of Trade on theEnvironment", Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34(1), pp.1~15 (2005)
  5. Copeland, B. R, "North-South Trade and the Environment", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), pp.755~787 (1994)
  6. Dinda, S, "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: a Survey", EcologicalEconomics, 49, pp.431~455 (2004)
  7. Dinda, S, "Income and Emission: a Panel Data-basedCointegration Analysis", Ecological Economics, 57, pp.167~181 (2006)
  8. Doornik, J, "Interactive Econometric Modeling of DynamicSystem (PcFiml 8.0) (University of Oxford Institute of Economics andStatistics)" (1994), London: International Thomson Publishing
  9. Doornik, J, "Empirical Econometric Modeling (PcGive 10)" (2001), London, UK: Timberlake Consultants Ltd
  10. Elliot, G, "Efficient Tests for an AutoregressiveUnit Root", Econometrica, 64(4), pp.813~836 (1996)
  11. Engle, R. F, "Cointegration and Error CorrectionRepresentation: Estimation and Testing", Econometrica, 55, pp.251~276 (1987)
  12. Friedl, B, "Determinants of CO2 Emission in a Small OpenEconomy", Ecological Economics, 45, pp.133~148 (2003)
  13. Ghali, K. H, "Energy Use and Output Growth inCanada: a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis", Energy Economics, 26, pp.225~238 (2004)
  14. Glasure, Y. U, "Cointegration, Error-correction, and the Relationship between GDP and Energy: the Case of South Korea andSingapore", Resource and Energy Economics, 20, pp.17~25 (1997)
  15. Gonzalo, J, "Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long-run EquilibriumRelationships", Journal of Econometrics, 60(1), pp.203~233 (1994)
  16. Environmental Impacts of the North AmericaFree Trade Agreement, "Grossman, G", ~, pp.NBER Working Paper No. 3914. (1991)
  17. Grossman, G, "Environmental Impacts of the North American Free TradeAgreement in The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement" (1993), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  18. Hakkio, C, "Cointegration: How Short is the Long Run", Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(4), pp.571~581 (1991)
  19. Harris, R, "Applied Time Series Modeling and Forecasting" (2003), England: John Wiley and Sons Inc
  20. Heil, M. T, "Panel Stationarity with Structural Breaks:Carbon Emissions and GDP", Applied Economic Letter, 6, pp.223~225 (1999)
  21. Jalil, A, "Environment Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions:a Cointegration Analysis for China", Energy Policy, 37, pp.5167~5172 (2009)
  22. Johansen, S, "Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vector", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp.231~254 (1998)
  23. Johansen, S, "Testing Structural Hypotheses in a MultivariateCointegration Analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK", Journal of Econometrics, 53(13), pp.211~244 (1992)
  24. Johansen, S, "Cointegration Analysis in thePresence of Structural Breaks in the Deterministic Trend", Econometric Journal, 3(2), pp.216~249 (2000)
  25. Kraft, J, "On the Relationship between Energy and GNP", Journal of Energy and Development, 3, pp.401~403 (1978)
  26. Lütkepohl, H, "New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis" (2005), NY: Springer
  27. Maddala, G. S, "Unit roots, Cointegration, and StructuralChange" (1998), UK: Cambridge University Press
  28. Managi, S, "Environmental Productivity and Kuznets Curve in India", Ecological Economics, 65, pp.432~440 (2008)
  29. Miller, S. M, "Cointegration and Error-correction Model:the Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending", Southern Economic Journal, 57(1), pp.221~229 (1990)
  30. Ozturk, I, "A Literature Survey on Energy-growth Nexus", Energy Policy, 38, pp.340~349 (2010)
  31. Shafik, N, "Economic Development and Environmental Quality: an EconomicAnalysis", Oxford Economic Papers, 46, pp.757~773 (1994)
  32. Soytas, U, "Energy Consumption and GDP: Causality Relationshipin G-7 Countries and Emerging Markets", Energy Economics, 25, pp.33~37 (2003)
  33. Soytas, U, "Energy Consumption and Income in G-7 Countries", Journal of Policy Modeling, 28(7), pp.739~750 (2006)
  34. Soytas, U, "Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emission:Challenges Faced by an EU Candidate Member", Ecological Economics, 68, pp.1667~1675 (2009)
  35. Soytas, U, "Energy Consumption and GDP Relationin Turkey: a Cointegration and Vector Error Correction Analysis in Economies And Business in Transition: Facilitating Competitiveness and Change in the Global Environment Proceedings", Global Business and TechnologyAssociation, 838~844 (2001)
  36. Soytas, U, "Energy consumption, income, and carbonemissions in the United States", Ecological Economics, 62, pp.482~489 (2007)
  37. Stern, D. I, "A multivariate Cointegration Analysis of the Role of Energyin the U. S. Macroeconomy", Energy Economics, 15, pp.137~150 (2000)
  38. World Bank, "World Development Indicators", ~
  39. Yu, E. S. H, "The Causal Relationship between Energy andGNP: an International Comparison", Journal of Energy and Development, 10, pp.249~272 (1985)
  40. Zhang, X. P, "Energy Consumption, Carbon Emission,and Economic Growth in China", Ecological Economics, 68(10), pp.2706~2712 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)