본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

오장변증설문지 예측 타당도 연구

Validation of Five Organ Pattern Identification Questionnaire

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive validity of the five organ pattern identification questionnaire(FOPIQ). Data collection was conducted from 190 people who were randomly selected from the general population living in D city from October 2016 to June 2017, and the collected data were analyzed by SPSS 23.0 Statistics Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to know the relation between the expert’s score and FOPIQ’s one. The cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed through ROC-curve. Significant p was <.05. The pearson correlation coefficient was .735, .756, .762, .736, and .513 between individual score of FOPIQ and that of the experts in liver, heart, spleen, lung, and kidney, respectively. The cut-off value of the FOPIQ was 46.209, 47.276, 45.336, 48.823, and 42.508 in liver, heart, spleen, lung, and kidney respectively. The AUC derived from the cut-off value of the FOPIQ was .907, .854, .888, .902, and .781 respectively. This study suggests that the FOPIQ could be valid to apply for general population in clinics as well as health checkups.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive validity of the five organ pattern identification questionnaire(FOPIQ). Data collection was conducted from 190 people who were randomly selected from the general population living in D city from October 2016 to June 2017, and the collected data were analyzed by SPSS 23.0 Statistics Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to know the relation between the expert’s score and FOPIQ’s one. The cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed through ROC-curve. Significant p was <.05. The pearson correlation coefficient was .735, .756, .762, .736, and .513 between individual score of FOPIQ and that of the experts in liver, heart, spleen, lung, and kidney, respectively. The cut-off value of the FOPIQ was 46.209, 47.276, 45.336, 48.823, and 42.508 in liver, heart, spleen, lung, and kidney respectively. The AUC derived from the cut-off value of the FOPIQ was .907, .854, .888, .902, and .781 respectively. This study suggests that the FOPIQ could be valid to apply for general population in clinics as well as health checkups.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. WHO (World Health Organization), "WHO traditional medicine. Strategy 2014-2023" (2013), WHO Press
  2. Marian R Stuart, "Therapeutic talk in primary care. MD World. 5th", pp.1~21
  3. O'Sullivan, "Research methods for public administrators" (1995), Longman Publishers
  4. Kim KH, "Survey using questionnaire", pp.12~20 (2014)
  5. 구병수, "加味歸脾湯의 우울증 투약지침 개발을 위한 기초연구 - 우울증 변증 설문지의 신뢰도 타당도 평가 -", 동의신경정신과학회지, 20(4), pp.1~13 (2009), 대한한방신경정신과학회
  6. 신동윤, "사상체질 진단을 위한 2단계 설문지(TS-QSCD)의 표준화 연구", 사상체질의학회지, 21(1), pp.99~126 (2009), 사상체질의학회
  7. Ko MM, "The reliability and validity of instruments measuring pattern identification in Korean medicine: A systematic review", European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 15, pp.47~63 (2017)[DOI]
  8. 장은수, "한의 변증 설문지 개발 표준프로세스 제안", 동의생리병리학회지, 30(3), pp.190~200 (2016), 한의병리학회[DOI]
  9. Korean medical society of Chung-chung-nam-do, "KCD guide line for clinical Korean medical doctor", 68~69 (2016)
  10. 장은수, "한국표준질병·사인분류에 따른 한의 변증 설문지 개발 및 활용현황 고찰", 동의생리병리학회지, 30(2), pp.124~130 (2016), 한의병리학회[DOI]
  11. Korea Institution Oriental Medicine, "Survey on the Use of Dialectic in Korean Clinical Clinic" (2014)
  12. 장은수, "한의 오장변증진단평가 도구 개발을 위한 기초 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 31(2), pp.126~137 (2017), 한의병리학회[DOI]
  13. 장은수, "한의 오장 변증·평가 설문지 개발을 위한 신뢰도 및 타당도 평가", 동의생리병리학회지, 31(3), pp.173~181 (2017), 한의병리학회[DOI]
  14. 설선희, "경계정충 한의 평가도구 개발 기초 연구", 동의신경정신과학회지, 21(3), pp.1~18 (2010), 대한한방신경정신과학회
  15. Lim JS. Park YB, "A study on reliability and validity of the pyungweesan patternization questionnaire by the pathogenesis analysis", Journal of korean Institute of Oriental Medical Diagnostics, 11(1), pp.59~67 (2007)
  16. Park YJ, "Development of a valid and reliable phlegm pattern questionnaire", The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 17(9), pp.851~858 (2011)[DOI]
  17. 홍한나, "호흡실조와 증형간 연관성 연구: 한열, 담음, 음허, 노권 및 네이메헨 설문을 중심으로", 동의신경정신과학회지, 27(4), pp.215~221 (2016), 대한한방신경정신과학회
  18. 이인선, "한방진단시스템과 진단의 간의 진단일치도 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 22(6), pp.1359~1367 (2008), 한의병리학회
  19. 신수진, "불면증을 호소하는 성인의 주관적 수면 평가와 객관적 수면 평가", Korean Journal of Health Promotion, 8(3), pp.141~149 (2008), 대한임상건강증진학회
  20. 이헌수, "우울증 변증도구의 신뢰도, 타당도 평가", 동의신경정신과학회지, 26(4), pp.407~416 (2015), 대한한방신경정신과학회
  21. Aktas A, "Symptom clusters: myth or reality?", Palliative Medicine, 24(4), pp.373~385 (2010)[DOI]
  22. 김민영, "항암화학요법 시행 초기 암환자의 증상 및 삶의 질 변화 양상", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 39(3), pp.433~445 (2009), 한국간호과학회
  23. Science synthesizing Dictionary Publisher, "The Dictionary of Oriental Medicine", pp.19~ (1990), Ggachi
  24. J.A. Swets, "Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems", Science, 240(4857), pp.1285~1293 (1988)[DOI]
  25. 이한얼, "荊防地黃湯 전탕액이 노화쥐의 신장, 비장, 방광 세포의 항산화능에 미치는 영향", 사상체질의학회지, 20(2), pp.85~97 (2008), 사상체질의학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)