코로나19 백신 접종자와 미접종자의 백신 접종 의사결정 경험에 관한 질적 연구
Navigating COVID-19 vaccination: A qualitative comparison of choices and experiences
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: COVID-19 vaccines have been pivotal in the pandemic response. This study examined the decision-making processes and influencing factors among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Methods: Focus group interviews were conducted in February and April 2023 with 21 participants aged 40–64 years, including 17 vaccinated and 4 unvaccinated individuals. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Results: Vaccinated individuals were categorized as ‘proactive adopters,’ ‘conforming vaccinators,’ and ‘inconvenience avoiders.’ Unvaccinated individuals were classified as ‘safety-concerned rejectors,’ ‘conforming rejectors,’ and ‘control resisters.’ Proactive adopters followed recommendations or independently chose to vaccinate, while inconvenience avoiders considered the consequences of not being vaccinated. Safety-concerned rejectors and control resisters were driven by concerns over vaccine safety and resistance to external pressures. Family influence significantly impacted both conforming vaccinators and rejectors. Conclusion: To enhance vaccine uptake during a pandemic, it is crucial to understand the diverse contexts and factors influencing vaccination decisions, particularly among those who are ambivalent or hesitant.
Abstract
Objectives: COVID-19 vaccines have been pivotal in the pandemic response. This study examined the decision-making processes and influencing factors among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Methods: Focus group interviews were conducted in February and April 2023 with 21 participants aged 40–64 years, including 17 vaccinated and 4 unvaccinated individuals. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Results: Vaccinated individuals were categorized as ‘proactive adopters,’ ‘conforming vaccinators,’ and ‘inconvenience avoiders.’ Unvaccinated individuals were classified as ‘safety-concerned rejectors,’ ‘conforming rejectors,’ and ‘control resisters.’ Proactive adopters followed recommendations or independently chose to vaccinate, while inconvenience avoiders considered the consequences of not being vaccinated. Safety-concerned rejectors and control resisters were driven by concerns over vaccine safety and resistance to external pressures. Family influence significantly impacted both conforming vaccinators and rejectors. Conclusion: To enhance vaccine uptake during a pandemic, it is crucial to understand the diverse contexts and factors influencing vaccination decisions, particularly among those who are ambivalent or hesitant.
참고문헌 (33)
- Acharya, S. R., "Assessing attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination in South Korea", Frontiers in Psychology, 12, pp.694151~ (2021)[DOI]
- Adu, P., "Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake : A systematic review", Journal of Infection and Public Health, 16(3), pp.441~466 (2023)[DOI]
- Ahn, S., "Outbreak report of COVID-19 during designation of class 1 infectious disease in the Republic of Korea(January 20, 2020 and April 24, 2022)", Public Health Weekly Report, 15(25), pp.1759~1772 (2022)
- Bae, S., "Influencing factors of COVID-19 vaccination intention among college students : Based on Andersen’s model", Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing, 35(3), pp.384~400 (2021)[DOI]
- Baek, M. A., "Factors related to university students’ COVID-19 vaccination behavior : With a focus on one university in Chungcheongnam-do", Health and Social Welfare Review, 42(3), pp.230~245 (2022)[DOI]
- Baek, S. W., "A study on the validity of the nation’s safety obligation and restriction of fundamental rights in the constitution-Focusing on administrative measures in the COVID-19-", The Journal of Comparative Law, 22(1), pp.35~72 (2022)[DOI]
- Creswell, J. W., "Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches" (2013), SAGE Publications
- Creswell, J. W., "Determining validity in qualitative inquiry", Theory into Practice, 39(3), pp.124~130 (2000)[DOI]
- Who doesn’t want to be vaccinated? Determinants of vaccine hesitancy during COVID-19, "Dabla-Norris, E.", International Monetary Fund, ~ (2022)
- Grochowska, M., "A comparison of the level of acceptance and hesitancy towards the influenza vaccine and the forthcoming COVID-19 vaccine in the medical community", Vaccines, 9(5), pp.475~ (2021)[DOI]
- Han, M. -R., "Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intention among nursing students : Applying the health belief model", The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 7(3), pp.343~351 (2021)[DOI]
- Heo, J. Y., "Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Coronavirus disease 2019 in the early stage of outbreak", The Korean Journal of Medicine, 95(2), pp.67~73 (2020)[DOI]
- Hwang, S. -J., "Vaccination acceptance for COVID-19 : Implications of trust in government", Korea Journal of Population Studies, 44(2), pp.95~120 (2021)[DOI]
- Jang, K., "Analysis of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal : Focusing on demographic background, political ideology, COVID-19-related perceptions, social trust, and communication behavior", Journal of Social Science, 34(2), pp.23~54 (2023)[DOI]
- Jeong, S. -J., "Severity of COVID-19 associated with SARS-CoV-2 variants dominant period in the Republic of Korea", Public Health Weekly Report, 16(43), pp.1464~1487 (2023)[DOI]
- Joshi, A., "Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, intention, and hesitancy : A scoping review", Frontiers in Public Health, 9, pp.698111~ (2021)[DOI]
- Kim, D. J., "COVID-19 vaccine and psychosocial challenges", The Journal of Korean Diabetes, 22(3), pp.185~191 (2021)[DOI]
- Kim, S. -Y., "Public kindergarten teachers’ experiences of priority vaccination for COVID-19 : A study on the choices of teachers and a democratic teacher community", The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 28(2), pp.157~185 (2023)[DOI]
- "Claiming circulating online about president Moon’s faking his COVID-19 shot is not true" (2021)[URL]
- Leask, J., "Communicating with parents about vaccination : A framework for health professionals", BMC Pediatrics, 12, pp.154~ (2012)[DOI]
- Lee, D. B., "Self-rated health according to change of lifestyle after COVID-19 : Differences between age groups", Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 39(2), pp.1~13 (2022)[DOI]
- Lincoln, Y. S., "Naturalistic inquiry", pp.289~331 (1985), SAGE Publications
- MacDonald, N. E., "Vaccine hesitancy : Definition, scope and determinants", Vaccine, 33(34), pp.4161~4164 (2015)[DOI]
- Montagni, I., "Acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine is associated with ability to detect fake news and health literacy", Journal of Public Health, 43(4), pp.695~702 (2021)[DOI]
- COVID-19 response 2: K-pandemic prevention made with the people (National white paper of the Moon Jae-In administration, Vol. 8), "Moon Jae-In Administration", Moon Jae-In Administration, ~ (2022)
- Morales, G. I., "Exploring vaccine hesitancy determinants during the COVID-19 pandemic : An in-depth interview study", SSM-Qualitative Research in Health, 2, pp.100045~ (2022)[DOI]
- Morgan, D. L., "Focus group as qualitative research" (1988), SAGE Publications
- Park, H. K., "Political ideologies, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in South Korea : A cross-sectional survey", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), pp.10655~ (2021)[DOI]
- Piltch-Loeb, R., "Determinants of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy spectrum", PLoS One, 17(6), pp.e0267734~ (2022)[DOI]
- Ritchie, J., "Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers" (2014), SAGE Publications
- Sandelowski, M., "The problem of rigor in qualitative research", Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), pp.27~37 (1986)[DOI]
- Song, J., "National prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy during the initial phase pandemic", European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 27(17), pp.8280~8290 (2023)[DOI]
- Wu, C. -F., "Impact of family participation on vaccination decisions during the outbreak : An online questionnaire survey of Taiwanese people", Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 10(1), pp.39~45 (2022)[DOI]