본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

응급구조(학)과 학생들의 구급현장실습 표준 평가도구의 유용성에 관한 연구

A study on the usefulness of standard evaluation tools for ambulance ride practices of paramedic students

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study tests the validity of a standard evaluation tool of ambulance ride practices with new evaluation items and supports its application by 119 preceptors. Methods: We tested the validity of standard evaluation items collected from 19 on-site professionals assessing ambulance ride practices. New evaluation items, ‘understanding of emergency rescue equipment’ and ‘ability to communicate’, were added as additional criteria. The modified Delphi technique was used to test the three evaluation areas and ten evaluation items. We used the analytic hierarchy process to analyze the weighting value of the reconstructed evaluation tool model. Results: All three evaluation areas and 10 evaluation items within the standard evaluation tools used for ambulance ride practices corresponded with the consistency index, degree of convergence, and agreement in the modified Delphi panel. Conclusion: These results provide evidence of the consistency and usefulness behind preceptors’ use of this standard evaluation tool in ambulance ride practice.

Abstract

Purpose: This study tests the validity of a standard evaluation tool of ambulance ride practices with new evaluation items and supports its application by 119 preceptors. Methods: We tested the validity of standard evaluation items collected from 19 on-site professionals assessing ambulance ride practices. New evaluation items, ‘understanding of emergency rescue equipment’ and ‘ability to communicate’, were added as additional criteria. The modified Delphi technique was used to test the three evaluation areas and ten evaluation items. We used the analytic hierarchy process to analyze the weighting value of the reconstructed evaluation tool model. Results: All three evaluation areas and 10 evaluation items within the standard evaluation tools used for ambulance ride practices corresponded with the consistency index, degree of convergence, and agreement in the modified Delphi panel. Conclusion: These results provide evidence of the consistency and usefulness behind preceptors’ use of this standard evaluation tool in ambulance ride practice.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Wongtongkam N, "Effects of clinical placements on paramedic students’learning outcomes", Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 12(3), pp.24~31 (2017)[DOI]
  2. A study on standardization of secondary curriculum in the department of emergency medical technology, "Council of professors of the department of emergency medical technology", ~, pp.2019-01 (2020)
  3. 최은숙, "응급구조(학)과 학생의 구급차동승실습 지도자 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국응급구조학회지, 17(3), pp.101~113 (2013), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회[DOI]
  4. 홍성기, "전문대학 응급구조과의 국가직무능력표준(NCS) 기반 교육과정 개발 및 운영방안 연구", 한국응급구조학회지, 19(2), pp.83~98 (2015), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회[DOI]
  5. McCall L, "Factors affecting the education of pre-employment paramedic students during the clinical practicum", Australasian J Paramedicine, 7(4), pp.9903~9934 (2009)[DOI]
  6. 이숙희, "학생과 프리셉터가 지각한 프리셉터 역할의 중요도와 수행도", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 12(12), pp.291~303 (2012), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  7. 최은숙, "구급차동승실습 시 프리셉터 제도의 도입에 관한 인식과 수용도", 한국응급구조학회지, 18(1), pp.67~81 (2014), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회
  8. 김은애, "선임구급대원의 구급현장 프리셉터 역할인식에 대한 연구", 한국응급구조학회지, 23(1), pp.19~33 (2019), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회
  9. 임은정, "임상실습 수업평가를 위한 평가도구 개발 및 검증", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(1), pp.49~59 (2011), 한국의학교육학회
  10. 곽은미, "임상간호실습 현장지도자용 임상간호역량 평가도구 개발", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 48(4), pp.419~431 (2018), 한국간호과학회
  11. Lee CS, "Delphi method", pp.21~45 (2001), Gyoyukgwahaksa
  12. 임은애, "전문가 델파이 조사를 통한 원예치료 평가지표 구성요소 개발", 원예과학기술지, 30(3), pp.308~324 (2012), 한국원예학회[DOI]
  13. Murry Jr JW, "Delphi : A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research", Rev High Ed, 18(4), pp.423~436 (1995)
  14. Lawshe CH, "A quantitative approach to content validity", Pers Psychol, 28(4), pp.563~575 (1975)
  15. Saaty TL, "Highligt and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process", Eur J Oper Res, 74(3), pp.426~447 (1994)[DOI]
  16. Appel J, "Educational assessment guidelines : A clerkship directors in internal medicine commentary", Am J Med, 113(2), pp.172~179 (2002)[DOI]
  17. Kim YI, "Development of an evaluation baseline module for clinical clerkship:Gachon Medical School experience", Korean J Med Educ, 15(2), pp.131~139 (2003)[DOI]
  18. Kim MS, "Effect after change of evaluation method in surgical clerkship program", Korean J Med Educ, 15(3), pp.221~231 (2003)[DOI]
  19. Kim KH, "Is The Assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes in anesthesiology clerkships balanced?", Korean J Med Educ, 15(3), pp.213~219 (2003)[DOI]
  20. 양은배, "환자-의사간 의사소통 기술 교육에 대한 고찰", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 20(2), pp.99~107 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
  21. O’Brien K, "An Australian story : Paramedic education and practice in transition", Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 11(3) (2014)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)