본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국과 일본의 119구급자원 배치 기준 및 현황 비교: 지역별 119구급자원의 적정 배치 방안 모색을 중심으로

Comparison of resource allocation criteria and status of 119 emergency medical services in South Korea and Japan: exploring optimal resource allocation strategies for regional EMS

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study aims to compare 119 emergency medical services (EMS) in South Korea and Japan to provide essential data for EMS improvement in South Korea. Methods: Recent data and regulations on firefighting and EMS in South Korea and Japan were analyzed and compared. Results: South Korea follows a centralized approach to EMS, whereas Japan operates with autonomous bodies that establish their own criteria. Japan considers more regional variables than South Korea. In South Korea, there are shortages in fire station deployment among the 119 emergency medical resources in certain regions, leading to significant regional disparities. South Korea has a larger population served by its 119 emergency medical resources with a higher workload and dispatch numbers than Japan. The percentage of non-transported patients among the total number of dispatches was higher in South Korea. Conclusion: Increasing the number of medical professionals and ambulances per population to the level of Japan to reflect local conditions and include various underlying variables such as daytime population, aging, and emergency dispatch conditions in the deployment of 119 emergency resources, and to reduce the deployment gap between regions, will contribute to improving the performance of the South Korea EMS system.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare 119 emergency medical services (EMS) in South Korea and Japan to provide essential data for EMS improvement in South Korea. Methods: Recent data and regulations on firefighting and EMS in South Korea and Japan were analyzed and compared. Results: South Korea follows a centralized approach to EMS, whereas Japan operates with autonomous bodies that establish their own criteria. Japan considers more regional variables than South Korea. In South Korea, there are shortages in fire station deployment among the 119 emergency medical resources in certain regions, leading to significant regional disparities. South Korea has a larger population served by its 119 emergency medical resources with a higher workload and dispatch numbers than Japan. The percentage of non-transported patients among the total number of dispatches was higher in South Korea. Conclusion: Increasing the number of medical professionals and ambulances per population to the level of Japan to reflect local conditions and include various underlying variables such as daytime population, aging, and emergency dispatch conditions in the deployment of 119 emergency resources, and to reduce the deployment gap between regions, will contribute to improving the performance of the South Korea EMS system.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. National fire agency119, "2023 Statistical yearbook of emergency services"
  2. 유인술, "응급의학의 역사: 발전의 3요소와 해결해야 할 과제", 대한응급의학회지, 33(1), pp.1~10 (2022), 대한응급의학회
  3. 이달별, "구급서비스의 지역 불균형: 부산시 119 구급활동일지 분석", 한국지리정보학회지, 23(3), pp.161~173 (2020), 한국지리정보학회[DOI]
  4. "Act on 119 rescue and emergency medical services, Korea"[URL]
  5. "Fire service act, Japan"[URL]
  6. "Enforcement decree of the act on 119 rescue and emergency medical services, Korea"[URL]
  7. "Framework act on firefighting services, Japan"[URL]
  8. "Emergency Medical Service Act, Korea"[URL]
  9. "Emergency life-saving technicians law, Japan"[URL]
  10. "Local Autonomy Act, Korea"[URL]
  11. "2016 Japan's local autonomy system(The revised edition of 2019)"[URL]
  12. "2022 fire white paper"[URL]
  13. "Firefighting organization law, Japan"[URL]
  14. "Fire and disaster management agency, Japan"[URL]
  15. "2021 fire white paper"[URL]
  16. Gyeonggi province disaster management headquarters, "119 situation management guidelines", ~ (2021)
  17. "Fire and disaster management agency, Japan"[URL]
  18. "Enforcement rules of the emergency medical service Act, Korea"[URL]
  19. "Partial revision of "scope of emergency medical care, etc."" (2009)[URL]
  20. "Fire and disaster management agency, Japan"[URL]
  21. "Emergency life-saving technicians law enforcement rule, Japna"[URL]
  22. "Framework act on firefighting services, Korea. (regulations on the establishment of local fire departments)"[URL]
  23. "Regulations on the establishment of local fire services, Korea"[URL]
  24. "Framework act on firefighting services, Japan"[URL]
  25. Takayuki E, "The problems of saitama city and the near future of Japan in light of changes in emergency transportation conditions", J-STAGE, 23(6), pp.780~787 (2020)[DOI]
  26. "Information on emergency relief center project (#7119)"[URL]
  27. "Emergency service operations review committee report"[URL]
  28. Kentaro K, "Impact of the number of on-scene emergency life-saving technicians and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in osaka city", Resuscitation, 85(1), pp.59~64 (2014)[DOI]
  29. 김진동, "구급서비스 수요와 소방력에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 14(9), pp.4485~4491 (2013), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  30. 백홍석, "한국과 일본의 소방 구급 출동 및 구급인력 규모 비교 연구", 한국응급구조학회지, 23(2), pp.87~97 (2019), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)