본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공개 데이터집합에 대한 무조정, 실시간 프라이버시 보존

Unadjusted and Realtime Privacy Preservation for Publishing Data Set

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

본 연구는 사용자로 하여금 내용 조정 없는 원본 데이터집합을 실시간 접근 가능하게 하면서 프라이버시를 보존하는 방안을 제안한다. 프라이버시 보존을 위한 지금까지의 방법들은 개체노출 방지를 위한 k-익명화와 민감속성노출 방지를 위한 l-다양화를 적용함에 따른 데이터 사용성 저하가 불가피하였다. 본 연구에서는 개체노출을 허용하는 대신 l-다양화를 통한 민감속성노출 방지만으로 프라이버시를 보존하는 방안을 제안한다. 사용자에게 제공하는 민감속성값 집합은 민감속성 온톨로지로부터 의미적으로 근접한 내용들을 선택하여 단일 혹은 군집개체에 연결할 내용으로 구성함으로써 민감속성값 집합의 정보손실을 감소시겼다. 실험을 통하여 동일 다양성 기준으로 60% 내외의 민감속성값 집합 정보손실 감소를 확인하였다. 사용자가 접근의도에 부합하는 내용 획득 정도를 나타내는 정밀도를 기준으로 k-익명화 수준별로 데이터 사용성을 파악함으로써 개체노출 허용에 따른 데이터 사용성 저하 방지의 유용함을 고찰하였다.

Abstract

This study proposes an approach to enable users to access the unadjusted original dataset in real time while preserving privacy. While previous methods for privacy preservation have employed kanonymity for entity disclosure prevention and ldiversity for attribute disclosure prevention, this study suggests an approach that preserves privacy solely through attribute disclosure prevention via ldiversity, excluding entity disclosure prevention. By not implementing kanonymity, the adjustment of quasiidentifiers in published datasets became unnecessary, thereby preventing a decrease in data usability. By accessing an ontology of sensitive attributes and selecting semantically related values, a set of sensitive attribute values connected to a single entity or an entity cluster was constructed, thus reducing information loss within the provided set of sensitive attribute values for users.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. L. Sweeney, "Computational disclosure control for medical microdata: the datafly system, Record linkage techniques", pp.12~54 (1997), National Academy Press
  2. P. Samarati, "Protecting respondents’ identities in microdata release", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(6), pp.1010~1027 (2001)
  3. R. Mendes, "Privacy-preserving data mining : methods, metrics, and applications", IEEE Access, 5, pp.10562~10582 (2017)
  4. A. Majeed, "Anonymization Techniques for Privacy Preserving Data Publishing: A Comprehensive Survey", IEEE Access, 9, pp.8512~8545 (2020)
  5. M. Cunha, "A survey of privacy-preserving mechanisms for heterogeneous data types", Computer Science Reviews, 41 (2021)
  6. H. Tahir, "Intelligent Sustainable Systems", pp.277~285 (2022), Springer
  7. J. Alemany, "A Review of Privacy Decision-making Mechanisms in Online social network", ACM Computing Survey, 55, pp.1~32 (2023)
  8. L. Sweeney, "Achieving k-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression", International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based System, 10(5), pp.571~588 (2002)
  9. R. Wong, "kanonymity:an enhanced k-anonymity model for privacy preserving data publishing", ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2006)
  10. J. Byun, "Secure Anonymization for Incremental Data Sets", Proceedings of the 3rd Very Large Data Bases International Conference on Secure Data Management, pp.48~63 (2006)
  11. J. Byun, "Privacy-Preserving Incremental Data Dissemination", ACM Journal of Computer Security, 17(1), pp.43~68 (2009)
  12. K. Babu, "Achieving k-anonymity using improved greedy heuristics for very large relational databases", Transactions of Data Privacy, 6, pp.1~17 (2013)
  13. D. Mohapatra, "k-degree closeness anonymity: a centrality measure based approach for network anonymization", Proceedings of ICDCIT, pp.299~310 (2015)
  14. J. Casas-Roma, "k-Degree anonymity and edge selection:improving data utility in large networks", Knowledge Information Systems, 50, pp.447~474 (2017)
  15. L. Boyu, "Local Generalization and Bucketization Technique for Personalized Privacy Preservation", Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 35(1), pp.393~404 (2023)
  16. A. Machanavajjhala, "L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity", ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 1(1), pp.54~81 (2007)
  17. E. Zheleva, "Preserving the privacy of sensitive relationship in graph data", Proceeding of the international workshop on privacy, security and trust in KDD, pp.153~171 (2007)
  18. P. Fabian, "Flexible data anonymization using ARX—Current status and challenges ahead", Software: Practice and Experience, 50(7), pp.1277~1304 (2020)
  19. N. Li, "T-closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity", Proceedings of the 21st international conference on data engineering, IEEE Computer Society, pp.106~115 (2007)
  20. D. Mohapatra, "k-degree closeness anonymity: a centrality measurebased approach for network anonymization", Proceedings of ICDCIT, pp.299~310 (2015)
  21. S. Ji, "Structural data de-anonymization: Theory and practice", IEEE, 2016, 1~14
  22. A. Salva, "Discovering homophily in online social networks", MONET, 23(6), pp.1715~1726 (2018)
  23. M. Kat, "Towards a differential privacy and utility preserving machine learning classifier", Proceedings of Computer Science, 12, pp.176~181 (2012)
  24. D. Fida, "Practicing differential privacy in health care: A review", Transactions on Data Privacy, 6(1), pp.35~67 (2013)
  25. Q. Xiao, "Differentially private network data release via structural inference", Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp.911~920 (2014)
  26. Z. Ezgi, "Privacy preserving classification over differentially private data, Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery", pp.324~382 (2022), Wiley
  27. "UC Machine Learning Repository"[URL]
  28. "Disease Ontology"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)