본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대장암 선별검사로 시행한 분변잠혈반응검사의 의의

The Significance of Fecal Occult Blood Testing to Screen for Colon Cancer

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

목적: 국가 암 검진사업에 대장암이 추가되어 분변잠혈반응검사를 시행하고 있지만, 한국에서 분변잠혈반응검사에 대한 연구는 드물다. 3차 병원 검진센터에서 시행한 분변잠혈반응검사가 대장암 선별검사로서 의의가 있는지를 조사하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2004년 1월부터 2005년 4월까지 강남성모병원 검진센터를 방문한 검진자의 성적을 후향적으로 분석하였다. 모든 검진자는 분변잠혈반응검사를 위한 대변을 제출하도록 하였고, 추가적으로 하부위장관검사를 원하는 검진자는 검진 당일 결장이중조영촬영을 시행 받았다. 이들 두 검사에서 유소견자와 증상이 있는 환자는 검진일 이후에 소화기 내과에서 결장경검사를 하도록 하였다. 결과: 총 검진자 10,182명 중 8,198명(80.5%)이 대변을 제출하였다. 분변잠혈반응검사 양성 수검자는 149명(1.8%)이었고 연령이 많을수록 높은 양성률을 보였다(p<0.05). 분변잠혈반응검사 양성 수검자 149명 중 33명(22.1%)이 결장이중조영촬영이나 결장경검사를 시행 받았고, 진단은 대장암 2명(6.1%), 용종 7명(21.2%), 게실 6명(18.3%), 치질 5명(15.2%), 결핵성 장염 1명(3.0%), 정상 12명(36.4%)이었다. 분변잠혈반응검사 음성 수검자 8,049명 중 649명(8.1%)이 결장이중조영촬영이나 결장경검사를 시행 받았고, 진단은 대장암 3명(0.5%), 용종 102명(15.7%), 게실 95명(14.6%), 치질 55명(8.4%), 염증성 장염 6명(0.4%), 정상 388명(59.8%)이었다. 양성 수검자가 음성 수검자보다 대장암과 용종의 진단율이 높았다(p<0.05). 분변잠혈반응검사의 대장암에 대한 민감도는 40%, 특이도는 95.4%였다. 대장암의 평균연령은 67세로 모두 55세 이상이었다. 결론: 분변잠혈반응검사는 대장암 선별에 유용하지만 민감도가 낮으므로 이를 높이려는 방안이 필요하다.

Abstract

Background/Aims: We investigated the efficacy of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as a colon cancer screening tool in a tertiary hospital setting. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent routine check- ups at Kang-Nam St. Mary's Hospital Health Promotion Center from January 2004 to April 2005. All the subjects were encouraged to submit stool for a FOBT, while performing a double contrast barium enema (DCBE) was optional for those who wanted colon examination. Colonoscopy was performed if the FOBT or DCBE results were abnormal or if the patients had bowel symptoms. Results: The FOBT was performed in 8,198 of 10,182 patients (80.5%) who underwent routine check-ups. The overall positive rate of FOBT was 149 of 8,198 (1.8%) and this increased with age (p<0.05). Colonoscopy and/or DCBE was performed in 33 of 149 patients (22.1%) in the FOBT positive group. Colon cancer and polyp were diagnosed 2 (6.1%) and 7 (21.2%) patients, respectively, in the FOBT positive group, whereas colon cancer and polyp were diagnosed in 3 (0.5%) and 102 (15.7%) patients, respectively, in the FOBT negative group. The sensitivity and specificity of the FOBT for colon cancer was 40% and 95.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Although it had low sensitivity, the FOBT was a useful screening tool for detecting colon cancer in a tertiary hospital setting. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2007;35:68-73)

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "Cancer Statistics" (2006)
  2. "대장암 조기검진의 현황 및 발전방향", 4(suppl), pp.56S~65S (2006)
  3. "Comparison of fecal occult blood tests for screening of colorectal neoplasia", 30, pp.308~314 (1997)
  4. "One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult blood testing and examination of the distal colon", 39, pp.241~242 (2002)
  5. "Sensitivity of two-time immunochemical fecal occult-blood testing with sigmoidoscopy for the detection of advanced colon adenoma", 28, pp.291~297 (2004)
  6. "Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom", 329, pp.133~ (2004)
  7. "Report to the english bowel cancer screening working group. colorectal cancer screening options appraisal; cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and resource impact of alternative screening options for colorectal cancer" (2004)
  8. "Evaluation of the UK colorectal cancer screening pilot; Final report" (2003)
  9. "Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population", 56, pp.210~214 (2007)
  10. "Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood", pp.1365~1371
  11. "Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer", 348, pp.1472~1477 (1996)
  12. "Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test", 348, pp.1467~1471 (1996)
  13. "Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood", 91, pp.434~437 (1999)
  14. "Possible advantages and drawbacks of adding flexible sigmoidoscopy to hemoccult-II in screening for colorectal cancer. A randomized study", 34, pp.73~78 (1999)
  15. "A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population", 129, pp.422~428 (2005)
  16. "Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer", 133, pp.573~584 (2000)
  17. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of colon cancer screening by colonoscopic examination in Korea", 28, pp.1~8 (2004)
  18. "Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy" (1977)
  19. "Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale- Update based on new evidence", 124, pp.544~560 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

Single Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia김대용, Dae Hyun Kim, Dae Kyung Sohn, Hee Jin Chang, Hyo Seong Choi, Hyun Kyung Kim, Jae Gahb Park, Jin Myeong Huh, Joong Bae Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Seok Byung Lim, Seung Yong Jeong, Young Hoon Kim대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2005 · 제37권 제1호분변 검체의 분석 전 보관 상태가 분변잠혈반응검사 결과에 미치는 영향곽은혜, 문세진, 신보문, 유수진대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2009 · 제29권 제3호Results of Colorectal Cancer Screening of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2008김연주, 박은철, 신정임, 이후연, 전재관, 최귀선, 한미아대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2010 · 제42권 제4호Quality Metrics of a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea신현필, 이정일, 전정원, Dae Ho Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Jin Young Yoon, Kwang Ro Joo, Min Seob Kwak, Young-Hak Cho거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2018 · 제12권 제2호Is It Necessary to Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests with Borderline Results for Colorectal Cancer Screening?이양순, 이은영대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2018 · 제38권 제1호Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with positive results of fecal immunochemical test performed within 5 years since the last colonoscopy이진희, Chang Mo Moon, Yoon Suk Jung대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)