Association between Type of Sedation and the Adverse Events Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Analysis of 5 Years’ Data from a Tertiary Center in the USA
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The landscape of sedation for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures and the nature of the procedures themselves have changed over the last decade. In this study, an attempt is made to analyze the frequency and etiology of all major adverse events associated with GI endoscopy. Methods: All adverse events extracted from the electronic database and local registry were analyzed. Although the data analysis was retrospective, the adverse events themselves were documented prospectively. These events were evaluated after subdivision into propofol-based anesthesia and intravenous conscious sedation groups. Results: Cardiorespiratory events, including cardiac arrest, were the most common adverse events during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, while bleeding was more frequent in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Pancreatitis was the most frequent adverse event in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The frequencies of most adverse events were significantly higher in patients anesthetized with propofol. Automatic regression modeling showed that the type of sedation, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and the procedure type were some of the predictors of immediate life-threatening complications. Conclusions: Clearly, our regression modeling suggests a strong association between the type of sedation as well as various patient factors and the frequency of adverse events. The possible reasons for our results are the changing demographics, the worsening comorbidities of the patient population, and the increasing technical complexity of these procedures. Although extensive use of propofol has increased patient satisfaction and procedure acceptability, its use is also associated with more frequent adverse events.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The landscape of sedation for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures and the nature of the procedures themselves have changed over the last decade. In this study, an attempt is made to analyze the frequency and etiology of all major adverse events associated with GI endoscopy. Methods: All adverse events extracted from the electronic database and local registry were analyzed. Although the data analysis was retrospective, the adverse events themselves were documented prospectively. These events were evaluated after subdivision into propofol-based anesthesia and intravenous conscious sedation groups. Results: Cardiorespiratory events, including cardiac arrest, were the most common adverse events during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, while bleeding was more frequent in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Pancreatitis was the most frequent adverse event in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The frequencies of most adverse events were significantly higher in patients anesthetized with propofol. Automatic regression modeling showed that the type of sedation, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and the procedure type were some of the predictors of immediate life-threatening complications. Conclusions: Clearly, our regression modeling suggests a strong association between the type of sedation as well as various patient factors and the frequency of adverse events. The possible reasons for our results are the changing demographics, the worsening comorbidities of the patient population, and the increasing technical complexity of these procedures. Although extensive use of propofol has increased patient satisfaction and procedure acceptability, its use is also associated with more frequent adverse events.
참고문헌 (19)
- Goudra BG, "Significantly reduced hypoxemic events in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: predictors and practice effect", J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 30, pp.71~77 (2014)
- Wernli KJ, "Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy", Gastroenterology, 150, pp.888~894 (2016)
- Cooper GS, "Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis", JAMA Intern Med, 173, pp.551~556 (2013)
- 이창균, "Room for Quality Improvement in Endoscopist-Directed Sedation: Results from the First Nationwide Survey in Korea", Gut and Liver, 10(1), pp.83~94 (2016), 거트앤리버 발행위원회
- Goudra BG, "Cardiac arrests during endoscopy with anesthesia assistance", JAMA Intern Med, 173, pp.1659~1660 (2013)
- Goudra B, "Cardiac arrests in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy:a retrospective analysis of 73,029 procedures", Saudi J Gastroenterol, 21, pp.400~411 (2015)
- Mallampati SR, "A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study", Can Anaesth Soc J, 32, pp.429~434 (1985)
- Rex DK, "Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience", Gastroenterology, 137, pp.1229~1237 (2009)
- Sieg A, "Safety analysis of endoscopist-directed propofol sedation: a prospective, national multicenter study of 24,441 patients in German outpatient practices", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.517~523 (2014)
- Agostoni M, "Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience", Gastrointest Endosc, 74, pp.266~275 (2011)
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.707~718 (2012)
- Sharma VK, "A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 66, pp.27~34 (2007)
- Adeyemo A, "Does sedation type affect colonoscopy perforation rates?", Dis Colon Rectum, 57, pp.110~114 (2014)
- Goudra BG, "Outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: safety and efficacy of anesthetic management with a natural airway in 653 consecutive procedures", Saudi J Anaesth, 7, pp.259~265 (2013)
- Goudra BG, "Anesthesia for ERCP: impact of anesthesiologist’s experience on outcome and cost", Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2013, pp.570518~ (2013)
- Goudra BG, "Anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with left ventricular assist devices: initial experience with 68procedures", Ann Card Anaesth, 16, pp.250~256 (2013)
- Coté GA, "Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, pp.137~142 (2010)
- Barnett SR, "Deep sedation without intubation for ERCP is appropriate in healthier, non-obese patients", Dig Dis Sci, 58, pp.3287~3292 (2013)
- Goudra BG, "Safety of non-anesthesia provider-administered propofol (NAAP) sedation in advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: comparative meta-analysis of pooled results", Dig Dis Sci, 60, pp.2612~2627 (2015)