2009년 한국 뇌졸중 진료지침에서 뇌졸중 이차예방 중 두개강외 경동맥협착의 수술 또는 중재적 치료에 관한 내용의 부분 개정
Focused Update of 2009 Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical or Interventional treatment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis in Secondary Prevention of Stroke
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the publication of the fi rst edition of Korean clinical practice guidelines of secondary stroke prevention, encouraging data from recent large clinical trials and meta-analysis have led us to consider many therapeutic options in the treatment of symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis. Accordingly, the writing group of Clinical Research Center for Stroke decided to provide recent views on the therapeutic revascularization of extracranial carotid stenosis, and timely evidence-based recommendations. In this updated version, new evidences about carotid angioplasty/stenting, treatment timing, and perioperative preparation are given, and qualifying conditions for operator are elucidated. This refi nement was based on current consensus between Korean Society of Intravascular Neurosurgery, Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology, and Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgery and approved by Korean Stroke Society, Korean Neurological Association, and Korean Society of Geriatric Neurology. These recommendations are subject to future correction based on new evidences from ongoing and future studies. (Korean J Stroke 2011;13:99-106)
Abstract
Since the publication of the fi rst edition of Korean clinical practice guidelines of secondary stroke prevention, encouraging data from recent large clinical trials and meta-analysis have led us to consider many therapeutic options in the treatment of symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis. Accordingly, the writing group of Clinical Research Center for Stroke decided to provide recent views on the therapeutic revascularization of extracranial carotid stenosis, and timely evidence-based recommendations. In this updated version, new evidences about carotid angioplasty/stenting, treatment timing, and perioperative preparation are given, and qualifying conditions for operator are elucidated. This refi nement was based on current consensus between Korean Society of Intravascular Neurosurgery, Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology, and Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgery and approved by Korean Stroke Society, Korean Neurological Association, and Korean Society of Geriatric Neurology. These recommendations are subject to future correction based on new evidences from ongoing and future studies. (Korean J Stroke 2011;13:99-106)
참고문헌 (19)
- Rothwell PM, "Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis", Lancet, 361, pp.107~115 (2003)
- The SPACE Collaborative Group, "30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial", Lancet, 368, pp.1239~1247 (2006)
- Eckstein HH, "Results of the Stent- Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomized trial", Lancet Neurol, 7, pp.893~902 (2008)
- Mas JL, "Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial", Stroke, 35, pp.e18~20 (2004)
- Mas JL, "Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial", Lancet Neurol, 7, pp.885~892 (2008)
- Ederle J, "Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 375, pp.985~997 (2010)
- Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration, "Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data", Lancet, 376, pp.1062~1073 (2010)
- Bonati LH, "New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)", Lancet Neurol, 9, pp.353~362 (2010)
- CAVATAS Investigators, "Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS)", Lancet, 357, pp.1729~1237 (2001)
- Yadav JS, "Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in highrisk patients", N Engl J Med, 351, pp.1493~1501 (2004)
- Gurm HS, "Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients", N Engl J Med, 358, pp.1572~1579 (2008)
- Ederle J, "Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid And Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial", Lancet Neurol, 8, pp.898~907 (2009)
- Zarins CK, "Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS): 4-year outcomes", J Endovasc Ther, 16, pp.397~409 (2009)
- Brott TG, "Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis", N Engl J Med, 363, pp.11~23 (2010)
- "Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery", Lancet, 363, pp.915~924 (2004)
- Rerkasem K, "Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery", Stroke, 40, pp.e564~572 (2009)
- Furie KL, "Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association, 2011, pp.42, 227~276
- Brott TG, "ASA", ACCF, AANN, pp.AANS, ACR[DOI]
- European Stroke Organisation (ESO) executive committee, "Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008", Cerebrovasc Dis, 25, pp.457~507 (2008)