본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임상시험 등록시스템 및 연구결과 보고지침

Registration and Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Trials

4

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

임상연구는 사람을 대상으로 하기 때문에 그 내용 및 과정에 있어서 엄격한 윤리성과 과학적 객관성이 요구된다. 연구 시작 전부터 임상시험등록을 하고, 절차를 투명하게 공개하며, 연구 결과를 표준화된 지침에 맞춰 보고하는 체계는 이제는 거스를 수 없는 흐름이 되었다. 힘겨운 작업이기 보다는 좀 더 양질의 연구를 수행하고, 검증된 연구 보고들를 보다 쉽게 선택할 수 있는 기회가 많아졌다는 생각이 더 옳을 것이다. 나아가 이러한 흐름은 의학적 진료지침(guideline) 마련 등의 중대한 의학적 의사결정에 큰 도움이 되리라 예상한다. 아울러, 국내 임상시험등록관리시스템의 구축으로 인해 국내 임상연구 수행의 정보를 국제적으로 공유함으로써, 국내 연구의 객관성 향상과 윤리적 수행뿐 아니라, 연구 수준의 우수함을 해외에 홍보하는 기회가 될 것으로 생각된다. 이러한 등록관리시스템의 성공적 운영을 위해서는 정부의 지원 뿐 아니라 민간차원, 특히 연구수행자들의 적극적 참여가 필요할 것이다.

Abstract

Selective outcome reporting is a major problem because it has a negative impact on our scientific knowledge and is unethical as it involves research on human subjects. And inadequate quality of trials may distort the results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Thus, Clinical medicine tries to solve the problem of trials by making public registration before patient enrollment mandatory and encouraging to report the research outcomes by a specific guidelines. In the past few years, the registration of clinical trials and the reporting system has become routine, supported by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. In Korea, the clinical research registry named ‘Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS)’ was recently established and became a data provider as a primary registry to the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry Platform search portal. To expand the registration system and to operate them successfully and comprehensively, active participations of researchers as well as the government supports are required. (Korean J Med 2012;83:309-318)

참고문헌 (24)

  1. De Angelis C, "Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors", Ann Intern Med, 141, pp.477~478 (2004)
  2. "Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted tobiomedical journals: publishing and editorial issues related topublication in biomedical journals: obligation to registerclinical trials" (2009)[URL]
  3. Kim SY, "Selective reporting and clinical trial registry", Korean J Fam Med, 30, pp.923~ (2009)
  4. Simes RJ., "Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials", J Clin Oncol, 4, pp.1529~1541 (1986)
  5. Chan AW, "Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles", JAMA, 291, pp.2457~2465 (2004)
  6. Dickersin K., "The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence", JAMA, 263, pp.1385~1389 (1990)
  7. 박현영, "국내 임상연구등록시스템 구축 배경과 활성화 방안", 대한의사협회지, 54(1), pp.92~97 (2011), 대한의사협회
  8. "Clinical Trials.gov" (2007)[URL]
  9. "WMA declaration of Helsinkiethical principles for medical research involving human subjects" (2010)[URL]
  10. "International Clinical Trials Registry Platform: WHO data set" (2008)[URL]
  11. Tse T, "Reporting "basic results" in ClinicalTrials.gov", Chest, 136, pp.295~303 (2009)
  12. "Chungwon‐gun: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" (2011)[URL]
  13. Park HY., "Reporting guidelines for research outcomes: STROBE and CONSORT guideline", Intest research, 8(Suppl 1), pp.14~16 (2010)
  14. "STROBE statement" (2009)[URL]
  15. "Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of health Research" (2011)[URL]
  16. Altman DG, "Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials", Lancet, 335, pp.149~153 (1990)
  17. Hotopf M, "Putting trials on trial: the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology", JEpidemiol Community Health, 51, pp.354~358 (1997)
  18. Begg C, "Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement", JAMA, 276, pp.637~639 (1996)
  19. Moher D, "CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials", JAMA, 285, pp.1987~1991 (2001)
  20. "CONSORT statement"[URL]
  21. Schulz KF, "CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials", BMJ, 340, pp.332~ (2010)
  22. Moher D, "CONSORT Group (Consolitdated Standards for Reporting of Trials). Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation", JAMA, 285, pp.1992~1995 (2001)
  23. Hopewell S, "Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'", Trials, 9, pp.20~ (2008)
  24. Fung AE, "Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies", Ophthal, 116, pp.286~296 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)