Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-assisted tissue acquisition for subepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) for tissue acquisition (TA) from subepithelial lesions (SELs) is emerging as an alternative to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided TA. Only a limited number of studies compared the diagnostic utility of MIAB and EUS for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SELs; therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search from January 2020 to January 2022 was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety of MIAB and EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs. Results: Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled technical success rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence in- terval [CI], 0.89–1.04) and procedural time (mean difference=–4.53 seconds; 95% CI, –22.38 to 13.31] were comparable between both the groups. The overall chance of obtaining a positive diagnostic yield was lower with EUS than with MIAB for all lesions (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.98) but comparable when using a fine-needle biopsy needle (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83–1.04). The positive diagnostic yield of MIAB was higher for lesions <20 mm (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.89). Six studies reported no adverse events. Conclusions: MIAB can be considered an effective alternative to EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs without an increased risk of ad- verse events.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) for tissue acquisition (TA) from subepithelial lesions (SELs) is emerging as an alternative to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided TA. Only a limited number of studies compared the diagnostic utility of MIAB and EUS for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SELs; therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search from January 2020 to January 2022 was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety of MIAB and EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs. Results: Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled technical success rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence in- terval [CI], 0.89–1.04) and procedural time (mean difference=–4.53 seconds; 95% CI, –22.38 to 13.31] were comparable between both the groups. The overall chance of obtaining a positive diagnostic yield was lower with EUS than with MIAB for all lesions (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.98) but comparable when using a fine-needle biopsy needle (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83–1.04). The positive diagnostic yield of MIAB was higher for lesions <20 mm (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.89). Six studies reported no adverse events. Conclusions: MIAB can be considered an effective alternative to EUS-guided TA for upper GI SELs without an increased risk of ad- verse events.
참고문헌 (30)
- Humphris JL, "Subepithelial mass lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 23, pp.556~566 (2008)
- Hawes R, "Endosonography" (2018), Elsevier
- Polkowski M, "Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant submucosal tumors", Endoscopy, 37, pp.635~645 (2005)
- Buscaglia JM, "Diagnostic yield and safety of jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower GI tract", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.1147~1152 (2012)
- Akahoshi K, "Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration", World J Gastroenterol, 13, pp.2077~2082 (2007)
- Attila T, "Lesion size determines diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA with onsite cytopathologic evaluation for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions", Turk J Gastroenterol, 29, pp.436~441 (2018)
- van Riet PA, "Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions : a systemic review and meta-analysis", Endoscopy, 53, pp.411~423 (2021)
- Facciorusso A, "Comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for EUS-guided sampling of subepithelial lesions : a meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 91, pp.14~22 (2020)
- Zhang XC, "Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions : a meta-analysis", Surg Endosc, 30, pp.2431~2441 (2016)
- Yokohata N, "3 case of gastric SMT(submucal tumor)which was diagnoced before operation : open biopsy with ESD(endoscopic submucal dissection)for interstind SMT", Prog Dig Endosc, 70, pp.82~83 (2007)
- Ihara E, "Mucosal-incision assisted biopsy for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 5, pp.191~196 (2013)
- Dhaliwal A, "Clinical efficacy and safety of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Ann Gastroenterol, 33, pp.155~161 (2020)
- Dhaliwal A, "Diagnostic yield of deep biopsy via endoscopic submucosal dissection for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Ann Gastroenterol, 33, pp.30~37 (2020)
- Page MJ, "The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews", BMJ, 372, pp.n71~ (2021)
- Higgins JP, "The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials", BMJ, 343, pp.d5928~ (2011)
- Sterne JA, "ROBINS-I : a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions", BMJ, 355, pp.i4919~ (2016)
- 정윤숙, "Using Forceps Biopsy after Small Submucosal Dissection in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(11), pp.1768~1774 (2016), 대한의학회
- Kobara H, "Comparison of submucosal tunneling biopsy versus EUS-guided FNA for gastric subepithelial lesions : a prospective study with crossover design", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E695~E705 (2017)
- Osoegawa T, "Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a rapid on-site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions : a randomized cross-over study", Dig Endosc, 31, pp.413~421 (2019)
- Park J, "Prospective comparative study of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy and unroofing biopsy", Dig Liver Dis, 51, pp.831~836 (2019)
- Minoda Y, "Superiority of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy over ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosing small gastric subepithelial lesions : a propensity score matching analysis", BMC Gastroenterol, 20, pp.19~ (2020)
- Zoundjiekpon V, "Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration versus"Key-Hole Biopsy"in the diagnostics of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors : a prospective randomized interventional study", Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 164, pp.63~70 (2020)
- Sanaei O, "EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy versus single-incision with needle knife for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions : a randomized controlled trial", Endosc Int Open, 8, pp.E266~E273 (2020)
- Deprez PH, "Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Guideline", Endoscopy, 54, pp.412~429 (2022)
- Casali PG, "Gastrointestinal stromal tumours : ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up", Ann Oncol, 33, pp.20~33 (2022)
- Nishida T, "Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)in Japan : English version", Int J Clin Oncol, 13, pp.416~430 (2008)
- Kim HH, "Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor : advantages and hurdles", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 7, pp.192~205 (2015)
- Facciorusso A, "Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions", Dig Liver Dis, 54, pp.676~683 (2022)
- Larghi A, "Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope", Endoscopy, 46, pp.39~45 (2014)
- Matsuzaki I, "Forward-viewing versusoblique-viewing echoendoscopes in the diagnosis of upper GI subepithelial lesions with EUS-guided FNA : a prospective, randomized, crossover study", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.287~295 (2015)