Quality indicators in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a brief review of established guidelines
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive endoscopic technique that has many diagnostic and therapeutic implications. It is a procedure with small but significant life-threatening complications. To ensure the best possible care, minimize complications, and improve the quality of health care, a constant review of the performance of the operator using ideal benchmark standards is needed. Hence, quality indicators are necessary. The American and European Societies of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have provided guidelines on quality measures for ERCP, which describe the skills to be developed and training to be implemented in performing quality ERCP. These guidelines have divided the indicators into pre-procedure, intraprocedural, and post-procedure measures. The focus of this article was to review the quality indicators of ERCP.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive endoscopic technique that has many diagnostic and therapeutic implications. It is a procedure with small but significant life-threatening complications. To ensure the best possible care, minimize complications, and improve the quality of health care, a constant review of the performance of the operator using ideal benchmark standards is needed. Hence, quality indicators are necessary. The American and European Societies of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have provided guidelines on quality measures for ERCP, which describe the skills to be developed and training to be implemented in performing quality ERCP. These guidelines have divided the indicators into pre-procedure, intraprocedural, and post-procedure measures. The focus of this article was to review the quality indicators of ERCP.
참고문헌 (24)
- Kozarek RA, "The past, present, and future of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography", Gastroenterol Hepatol(N Y), 13, pp.620~622 (2017)
- ASGE Endoscopy Unit Quality Indicator Taskforce, "Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy units", VideoGIE, 2, pp.119~140 (2017)
- Adler DG, "Quality indicators for ERCP", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.91~101 (2015)
- Baron TH, "Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.892~897 (2006)
- Chutkan RK, "ERCP core curriculum", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.361~376 (2006)
- Rizk MK, "Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.3~16 (2015)
- Dumonceau JM, "ERCP-related adverse events : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Guideline", Endoscopy, 52, pp.127~149 (2020)
- Alkhatib AA, "Comorbidities, sphincterotomy, and balloon dilation predict post-ERCP adverse events in PSC patients : operator experience is protective", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.3685~3688 (2011)
- Triantafillidis JK, "Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy : current issues", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.463~481 (2013)
- Kapral C, "Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project", Endoscopy, 40, pp.625~630 (2008)
- DeBenedet AT, "Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : a meta-analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 108, pp.1696~1704 (2013)
- Ekkelenkamp VE, "Quality evaluation through self-assessment : a novel method to gain insight into ERCP performance", Frontline Gastroenterol, 5, pp.10~16 (2014)
- Schlup MM, "ERCP : a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit", Gastrointest Endosc, 46, pp.48~52 (1997)
- Siau K, "UK Joint Advisory Group consensus statements for training and certification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography", Endosc Int Open, 10, pp.E37~ (2022)
- Verma D, "Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond : a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy", Gastrointest Endosc, 65, pp.394~400 (2007)
- Szary NM, "Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them", Gastroenterol Hepatol(N Y), 9, pp.496~504 (2013)
- Carr-Locke DL, "Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones", Gastrointest Endosc, 56(6 Suppl), pp.S170~ (2002)
- Banerjee N, "Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy is not required for transpapillary SEMS placement for biliary obstruction", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.591~595 (2011)
- Stapfer M, "Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy", Ann Surg, 232, pp.191~198 (2000)
- Cotton PB, "Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures : results of an ASGE working party", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.868~874 (2011)
- Cotton PB, "Risk factors for complications after ERCP : a multivariate analysis of 11, 497 procedures over 12 years", Gastrointest Endosc, 70, pp.80~88 (2009)
- Domagk D, "Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound : a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Quality Improvement Initiative", Endoscopy, 50, pp.1116~1127 (2018)
- Cotton PB, "The ERCP quality network : a pilot study of benchmarking practice and performance", Am J Med Qual, 28, pp.256~260 (2013)
- Rodrigues-Pinto E, "ERCP competence assessment : miles to go before standardization", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E718~ (2017)