본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparative Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open Subtotal Gastrectomy for pT2 Gastric Cancer

4

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is a widely accepted surgery for early gastric cancer. However, its use in advanced gastric cancer has rarely been studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and survival outcomes of LADG for pT2 gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we evaluated 67 and 52 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and LADG, respectively, with diagnosis of pT2 gastric cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and survival were retrospectively compared between the two groups. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the proximal margin of the clinicopathological parameters. The operation time was significantly longer in LADG than in ODG (207.7 vs. 159.9 minutes). There were 6 (9.0%) and 5 (9.6%) complications in ODG and LADG, respectively. During follow-up periods, tumor recurrence occurred in 7 (10.4%) patients of the ODG and in 4 (7.7%) patients of the LADG group. The 5-year survival rate of ODG and LADG was 88.6% and 91.3% (p=0.613), respectively. In view of lymph node involvement, 5-year survival rates were 96.0% in ODG versus 97.0% in LADG for patients with negative nodal metastasis (p=0.968) and 80.9% in ODG versus 78.7% in LADG for those with positive nodal metastasis (p=0.868). Conclusion: Although prospective study is necessary to compare LADG with open gastrectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy might be considered as an alternative treatment for some pT2 gastric cancer.

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is a widely accepted surgery for early gastric cancer. However, its use in advanced gastric cancer has rarely been studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and survival outcomes of LADG for pT2 gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2009, we evaluated 67 and 52 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and LADG, respectively, with diagnosis of pT2 gastric cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and survival were retrospectively compared between the two groups. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the proximal margin of the clinicopathological parameters. The operation time was significantly longer in LADG than in ODG (207.7 vs. 159.9 minutes). There were 6 (9.0%) and 5 (9.6%) complications in ODG and LADG, respectively. During follow-up periods, tumor recurrence occurred in 7 (10.4%) patients of the ODG and in 4 (7.7%) patients of the LADG group. The 5-year survival rate of ODG and LADG was 88.6% and 91.3% (p=0.613), respectively. In view of lymph node involvement, 5-year survival rates were 96.0% in ODG versus 97.0% in LADG for patients with negative nodal metastasis (p=0.968) and 80.9% in ODG versus 78.7% in LADG for those with positive nodal metastasis (p=0.868). Conclusion: Although prospective study is necessary to compare LADG with open gastrectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy might be considered as an alternative treatment for some pT2 gastric cancer.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Ohtsu A, "Disparities in gastric cancer chemotherapy between the East and West", J Clin Oncol, 24, pp.2188~2196 (2006)
  2. Adachi Y, "Modern treatment of early gastric cancer: review of the Japanese experience", Dig Surg, 19, pp.333~339 (2002)
  3. 형우진, "Changes in Treatment Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Surgery Over 45 Years at A Single Institution", Yonsei Medical Journal, 49(3), pp.409~415 (2008), 연세대학교의과대학
  4. Kitano S, "Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy", Surg Laparosc Endosc, 4, pp.146~148 (1994)
  5. Kim MC, "Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer", J Surg Oncol, 91, pp.90~94 (2005)
  6. Kim MC, "Surgical outcome of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric cancer", Eur J Surg Oncol, 31, pp.401~405 (2005)
  7. Kitano S, "Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG) for cancer: our 10 years’ experience", Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 12, pp.204~207 (2002)
  8. 김기한, "조기 위암에서 수술시간을 고려한 복강경 보조하 위아전절제술의 학습곡선", 대한외과학회지, 70(2), pp.102~107 (2006), 대한외과학회
  9. Hwang SI, "Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer", Surg Endosc, 23, pp.1252~1258 (2009)
  10. Lee J, "Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: analysis of consecutive 106 experiences", J Surg Oncol, 100, pp.693~698 (2009)
  11. Shuang J, "A case-control study of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer", J Gastrointest Surg, 15, pp.57~62 (2011)
  12. Goh PM, "Early experience with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer", Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 11, pp.83~87 (2001)
  13. Nakamura K, "Gastric carcinoma confined to the muscularis propria: how can we detect, evaluate, and cure intermediate-stage carcinoma of the stomach?", Am J Gastroenterol, 94, pp.2251~2255 (1999)
  14. Otsuji E, "Characteristics of gastric carcinoma invading the muscularis propria", J Surg Oncol, 92, pp.104~108 (2005)
  15. Lu Y, "Prognostic significance of subclassification of pT2 gastric cancer: a retrospective study of 847 patients", Surg Oncol, 17, pp.317~322 (2008)
  16. Greene FL, "American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. 6th ed" (2002), Springer
  17. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, "Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3)", Gastric Cancer, 14, pp.113~123 (2011)
  18. Ki Han Kim, "Long-Term Outcomes and Feasibility with Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer", 대한위암학회지, 12(1), pp.18~25 (2012), 대한위암학회[DOI]
  19. Edge SB, "AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed" (2010), Springer
  20. Maruyama K, "Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality", World J Surg, 11, pp.418~425 (1987)
  21. Sawai K, "New trends in surgery for gastric cancer in Japan", J Surg Oncol, 56, pp.221~226 (1994)
  22. Adachi Y, "Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy", Ann Surg, 229, pp.49~54 (1999)
  23. Kim YW, "Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial", Ann Surg, 248, pp.721~727 (2008)
  24. Sarela AI, "Accurate lymph node staging is of greater prognostic importance than subclassification of the T2 category for gastric adenocarcinoma", Ann Surg Oncol, 10, pp.783~791 (2003)
  25. Pugliese R, "Total and subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma", Surg Endosc, 21, pp.21~27 (2007)
  26. Park do J, "Subclassification of pT2 gastric adenocarcinoma according to depth of invasion (pT2a vs pT2b) and lymph node status (pN)", Surgery, 141, pp.757~763 (2007)
  27. Isozaki H, "Prognostic factors of advanced gastric carcinoma without serosal invasion (pT2 gastric carcinoma)", Hepatogastroenterology, 46, pp.2669~2672 (1999)
  28. 김완수, "T2 위암에서 림프절 절제술의 범위에 관한 고찰", 대한외과학회지, 63(6), pp.468~472 (2002), 대한외과학회
  29. Abe S, "Long-term results of operation for carcinoma of the stomach in T1", T2 stages: critical evaluation of the concept of early carcinoma of the stomach, 1995, pp.181, 389~396

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)