본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Prognostic Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pancreatic cancer patients who underwent curative resection, which included 64 consecutive patients who had preoperative FDG PET scans. For statistical analysis, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary pancreatic cancer was measured. Survival time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to determine whether SUVmax added new predictive information concerning survival together with known prognostic factors. p<0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were respectively 42.9 months (27.6-58.2; 95% CI) and 14.9 months (10.1-19.7; 95% CI). When subjects were divided into two groups according to SUVmax with a cutoff value of 3.5, the high SUVmax group (n=32; SUVmax >3.5) showed significantly shorter OS and DFS than the low SUVmax group. Multivariate analysis of OS and DFS showed that both high SUVmax and poor tumor differentiation were independent poor prognostic factors. Conclusion: Our study showed that degree of FDG uptake was an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent curative resection.

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pancreatic cancer patients who underwent curative resection, which included 64 consecutive patients who had preoperative FDG PET scans. For statistical analysis, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary pancreatic cancer was measured. Survival time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to determine whether SUVmax added new predictive information concerning survival together with known prognostic factors. p<0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were respectively 42.9 months (27.6-58.2; 95% CI) and 14.9 months (10.1-19.7; 95% CI). When subjects were divided into two groups according to SUVmax with a cutoff value of 3.5, the high SUVmax group (n=32; SUVmax >3.5) showed significantly shorter OS and DFS than the low SUVmax group. Multivariate analysis of OS and DFS showed that both high SUVmax and poor tumor differentiation were independent poor prognostic factors. Conclusion: Our study showed that degree of FDG uptake was an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent curative resection.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Li D, "Pancreatic cancer", Lancet, 363, pp.1049~1057 (2004)
  2. Yeo CJ, "Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients", Ann Surg, 221, pp.721~731 (1995)
  3. Bang S, "The clinical usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis, staging, and response evaluation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer", J Clin Gastroenterol, 40, pp.923~929 (2006)
  4. Humphris JL, "The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer", Ann Oncol, 23, pp.1713~1722 (2012)
  5. 이경주, "Serum CA 19-9 and CEA Levels as a Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma", Yonsei Medical Journal, 54(3), pp.643~649 (2013), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
  6. Lim JE, "Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients", Ann Surg, 237, pp.74~85 (2003)
  7. Sohn TA, "Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators", J Gastrointest Surg, 4, pp.567~579 (2000)
  8. Ueda M, "Prognostic factors after resection of pancreatic cancer", World J Surg, 33, pp.104~110 (2009)
  9. Kauhanen SP, "A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography", computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer, 2009, pp.250, 957~963
  10. Zimny M, "Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma", Scand J Gastroenterol, 35, pp.883~888 (2000)
  11. Nakata B, "Prognostic predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with pancreatic cancer", Int J Oncol, 19, pp.53~58 (2001)
  12. Sperti C, "18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic carcinoma", J Gastrointest Surg, 7, pp.953~959 (2003)
  13. Lyshchik A, "Dual-phase 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients with pancreatic cancer", Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 32, pp.389~397 (2005)
  14. Maemura K, "Role of positron emission tomography in decisions on treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 13, pp.435~441 (2006)
  15. Lee SM, "Improved prognostic value of standardized uptake value corrected for blood glucose level in pancreatic cancer using F-18 FDG PET", Clin Nucl Med, 36, pp.331~336 (2011)
  16. Choi M, "Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to monitor clinical outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer", Am J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.257~261 (2010)
  17. Kuwatani M, "Modalities for evaluating chemotherapeutic efficacy and survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: comparison between FDG-PET, CT, and serum tumor markers", Intern Med, 48, pp.867~875 (2009)
  18. Higashi T, "Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) --usefulness and limitations in “clinical reality”", Ann Nucl Med, 17, pp.261~279 (2003)
  19. Reske SN, "Clinical value of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncologic questions: results of an interdisciplinary consensus conference. Schirmerreschaft der Deutschen Gesellschaft for Nuklearmedizin", Nuklearmedizin, 35, pp.42~52 (1996)
  20. Lyshchik A, "Expression of glucose transporter-1, hexokinase-II, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and survival of patients with pancreatic cancer", Cancer Invest, 25, pp.154~162 (2007)
  21. Wakabayashi H, "Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in surgery for pancreatic cancer", World J Gastroenterol, 14, pp.64~69 (2008)
  22. Jamieson NB, "Tissue biomarkers for prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Cancer Res, 17, pp.3316~3331 (2011)
  23. Bley TA, "Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma: tendency for understaging", In Vivo, 19, pp.983~987 (2005)
  24. Soriano A, "Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.492~501 (2004)
  25. Kapoor V, "An introduction to PET-CT imaging", Radiographics, 24, pp.523~543 (2004)
  26. Hany TF, "PET diagnostic accuracy: improvement with in-line PET-CT system: initial results", Radiology, 225, pp.575~581 (2002)
  27. FDG PET, "CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma", Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 34, pp.1355~1364 (2007)
  28. Halpern BS, "Evaluation of suspected local recurrence in head and neck cancer: a comparison between PET and PET", CT for biopsy proven lesions, 2007, pp.62, 199~204
  29. Freudenberg LS, "PET versus PET", CT dual-modality imaging in evaluation of lung cancer, 2007, pp.45, 639~644
  30. Kim JH, "Comparison between 18F-FDG PET, in-line PET", CT, and software fusion for restaging of recurrent colorectal cancer, 2005, pp.46, 587~595
  31. Tang S, "Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET, combined FDG-PET", CT and EUS in diagnosing primary pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis, 2011, pp.78, 142~150
  32. Buchs NC, "Value of contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography", computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study, 2011, pp.26, 657~662

관련 논문AI추천

Prognostic Significance of Volume-Based FDG PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Chemoradiation Therapy강버들, 송시영, 이재훈, 이정원, 이종두, 최혜진연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2014 · 제55권 제6호Prognostic Value of the Metabolic Response on Serial 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Pancreatic CancerAhn Jinwoo, Hwang Jin-Hyeok, Jung Kwangrok, Kim Bomi, Kim Jaihwan, Lee Jong-chan, Song Yoo Sung, Yang Soomin거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2025 · 제19권 제3호Preoperative Metabolic Tumor Volume2.5 Associated with Early Systemic Metastasis in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Transcriptome-Wide AnalysisChang Moo Kang, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Mijin Yun, Sung Hwan Lee, Woo Jung Lee거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2019 · 제13권 제3호Prognostic Factors for Patients with Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX이상협, Choi Young Hoon, Jang Jin-Young, Kim Sun-Whe, Kim Yong-Tae, Kwon Wooil, Paik Woo Hyun, Ryu Ji Kon, Shin Bang Sup, You Min Su거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2021 · 제15권 제2호Significance of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Measured Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma라선영, 박지수, 박형순, 이재훈, 전태주, 정희철, 천유진, 최혜진연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2019 · 제60권 제7호The Role of 18^F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Recurrence after Curative Gastrectomy강민경, 고광현, 권창일, 박필원, 안대호, 임규성, 전태주, 홍성표, 황성규, Ji Eun Lee연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2011 · 제52권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)