본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: The objective of this study was to elucidate the long-term prognosis of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators(ICDs) in Korea. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 405 patients (age, 57.7±16.7 years; 311 men) who had undergone ICD implantation. The patients were divided into three groups: heart failure (HF) and ICD for primary (group 1, n=118) and secondary prevention (group 2, n=93) and non-HF (group 3, n=194). We compared appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy delivery among the groups and between high- (heart rate ≥200 /min) and low-rate (<200 /min) ICD therapy zones. Results: During the follow-up period (58.9±49.8 months), the annual appropriate ICD therapy rate was higher in group 2 (10.4%) than in groups 1 and 3 (6.1% and 5.9%, respectively, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in annual inappropriate ICD therapy rate among the three groups. In group 1, the annual appropriate ICD therapy rate was significantly lower in patients with a high-rate versus a low-rate therapy zone (4.5% and 9.6%, respectively, p=0.026). In group 3, the annual inappropriate ICD therapyrate was significantly lower in patients with a high-rate versus a low-rate therapy zone (3.1% and 4.0%, respectively, p=0.048). Conclusion: Appropriate ICD therapy rates are not low in Korean patients with ICD, relative to prior large-scale studies in Westerncountries. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy could be reduced by a high-rate therapy zone in patients with HF and ICD for primary prevention, as well as non-HF patients, respectively.

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to elucidate the long-term prognosis of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators(ICDs) in Korea. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 405 patients (age, 57.7±16.7 years; 311 men) who had undergone ICD implantation. The patients were divided into three groups: heart failure (HF) and ICD for primary (group 1, n=118) and secondary prevention (group 2, n=93) and non-HF (group 3, n=194). We compared appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy delivery among the groups and between high- (heart rate ≥200 /min) and low-rate (<200 /min) ICD therapy zones. Results: During the follow-up period (58.9±49.8 months), the annual appropriate ICD therapy rate was higher in group 2 (10.4%) than in groups 1 and 3 (6.1% and 5.9%, respectively, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in annual inappropriate ICD therapy rate among the three groups. In group 1, the annual appropriate ICD therapy rate was significantly lower in patients with a high-rate versus a low-rate therapy zone (4.5% and 9.6%, respectively, p=0.026). In group 3, the annual inappropriate ICD therapyrate was significantly lower in patients with a high-rate versus a low-rate therapy zone (3.1% and 4.0%, respectively, p=0.048). Conclusion: Appropriate ICD therapy rates are not low in Korean patients with ICD, relative to prior large-scale studies in Westerncountries. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy could be reduced by a high-rate therapy zone in patients with HF and ICD for primary prevention, as well as non-HF patients, respectively.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Wever EF, "Randomized study of implantable defibrillator as firstchoice therapy versus conventional strategy in postinfarct sudden death survivors", Circulation, 91, pp.2195~2203 (1995)
  2. "A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) investigators", N Engl J Med, 337, pp.1576~1583 (1997)
  3. Connolly SJ, "Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone", Circulation, 101, pp.1297~1302 (2000)
  4. Kuck KH, "Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH)", Circulation, 102, pp.748~754 (2000)
  5. Moss AJ, "Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial investigators", N Engl J Med, 335, pp.1933~1940 (1996)
  6. Buxton AE, "A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial investigators", N Engl J Med, 341, pp.1882~1890 (1999)
  7. Moss AJ, "Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction", N Engl J Med, 346, pp.877~883 (2002)
  8. Kadish A, "Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy", N Engl J Med, 350, pp.2151~2158 (2004)
  9. Bardy GH, "Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure", N Engl J Med, 352, pp.225~237 (2005)
  10. WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, "2013 ACCF", AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, Circulation, pp.2013, 128[DOI]
  11. Moss AJ, "Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming", N Engl J Med, 367, pp.2275~2283 (2012)
  12. Kirkfeldt RE, "Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations:an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark", Eur Heart J, 35, pp.1186~1194 (2014)
  13. Gregoratos G, "ACC", AHA, American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (ACC, pp.AHA, NASPE committee to update the 1998 pacemaker guidelines)[DOI]
  14. Epstein AE, "ACC", AHA, American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the ACC, pp.AHA, NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons[DOI]
  15. Epstein AE, "2012 ACCF", AHA, AHA, pp.HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society[DOI]
  16. Moss AJ, "Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator", Circulation, 110, pp.3760~3765 (2004)
  17. Wilkoff BL, "Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (primary prevention parameters evaluation) study", J Am Coll Cardiol, 52, pp.541~550 (2008)
  18. Sjöblom J, "Efficacy of primary preventive ICD therapy in an unselected population of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction", Europace, 17, pp.255~261 (2015)
  19. Sabbag A, "Contemporary rates of appropriate shock therapy in patients who receive implantable device therapy in a real-world setting: from the Israeli ICD registry", Heart Rhythm, 12, pp.2426~2433 (2015)
  20. Satake H, "Current status of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with chronic heart failure--a report from the CHART-2 study", Circ J, 79, pp.381~390 (2015)
  21. 김지영, "The Relevance of the Primary Prevention Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation in Korean Symptomatic Severe Heart Failure Patients", Korean Circulation Journal, 42(3), pp.173~183 (2012), 대한심장학회
  22. Poole JE, "Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure", N Engl J Med, 359, pp.1009~1017 (2008)
  23. Wathen MS, "Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverterdefibrillators:pacing fast ventricular tachycardia reduces shock therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results", Circulation, 110, pp.2591~2596 (2004)
  24. Gasparini M, "Effect of long-detection interval vs standard-detection interval for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on antitachycardia pacing and shock delivery: the ADVANCE III randomized clinical trial", JAMA, 309, pp.1903~1911 (2013)
  25. Daubert JP, "Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact", J Am Coll Cardiol, 51, pp.1357~1365 (2008)
  26. 양정훈, "Predictors and Clinical Impact of Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in Korean Patients", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 27(6), pp.619~624 (2012), 대한의학회

관련 논문AI추천

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator of Korean Patients in a Single Center Registry곽혜빈, 김준수, 박경민, 박승정, 온영근, 황진경대한부정맥학회 · International Journal of Arrhythmia2017 · 제18권 제4호Clinical and Hospital Factors Affecting Treatment with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillators in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients김종윤, 박준범, 백용수, 성정훈, 오일영, 유희태, 이영수, 이재혁, 정보영, 최의근연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2020 · 제61권 제11호삽입형 심실제세동기를 삽입한 환자들의 임상적 특징김유호, 김정욱, 김형용, 남기병, 박경민, 최기준, 홍윤기대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2008 · 제74권 제1호Prognosis after Implantation of Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Korean Patients with Brugada Syndrome김영훈, 김유호, 김준수, 남기병, 박상원, 박승정, 박형욱, 변경민, 손명균, 온영근, 조정관, 최기준연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2014 · 제55권 제1호급성 심장사 발생 예방을 위한 혈관 외 이식형 심장 제세동기 삽입술에 관한 비교효과 연구: 매칭-보정 간접비교강영현, 김주연, 박형득한국보건의료기술평가학회 · 보건의료기술평가2023 · 제11권 제1호Echocardiographic, Electrocardiographic Changes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy after One Year최영, 변재호, 윤호중, 정미향, 정해억한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2017 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)