본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System on Quality of Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology among Korean Tertiary Hospitals

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: To examine changes in clinical practice patterns following the introduction of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) underthe fee-for-service payment system in July 2013 among Korean tertiary hospitals and to evaluate its effect on the quality of hospitalcare. Materials and Methods: Using the 2012−2014 administrative database from National Health Insurance Service claim data, we reviewedmedical information for 160400 patients who underwent cesarean sections (C-secs), hysterectomies, or adnexectomies at43 tertiary hospitals. We compared changes in several variables, including length of stay, spillover, readmission rate, and thenumber of simultaneous and emergency operations, from before to after introduction of the DRGs. Results: DRGs significantly reduced the length of stay of patients undergoing C-secs, hysterectomies, and adnexectomies (8.0±6.9vs. 6.0±2.3 days, 7.4±3.5 vs. 6.4±2.7 days, 6.3±3.6 vs. 6.2±4.0 days, respectively, all p<0.001). Readmission rates decreased after introductionof DRGs (2.13% vs. 1.19% for C-secs, 4.51% vs. 3.05% for hysterectomies, 4.77% vs. 2.65% for adnexectomies, allp<0.001). Spillover rates did not change. Simultaneous surgeries, such as colpopexy and transobturator-tape procedures, duringhysterectomies decreased, while colporrhaphy during hysterectomies and adnexectomies or myomectomies during C-secs didnot change. The number of emergency operations for hysterectomies and adnexectomies decreased. Conclusion: Implementation of DRGs in the field of obstetrics and gynecology among Korean tertiary hospitals led to reductionsin the length of stay without increasing outpatient visits and readmission rates. The number of simultaneous surgeries requiringexpensive operative instruments and emergency operations decreased after introduction of the DRGs.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine changes in clinical practice patterns following the introduction of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) underthe fee-for-service payment system in July 2013 among Korean tertiary hospitals and to evaluate its effect on the quality of hospitalcare. Materials and Methods: Using the 2012−2014 administrative database from National Health Insurance Service claim data, we reviewedmedical information for 160400 patients who underwent cesarean sections (C-secs), hysterectomies, or adnexectomies at43 tertiary hospitals. We compared changes in several variables, including length of stay, spillover, readmission rate, and thenumber of simultaneous and emergency operations, from before to after introduction of the DRGs. Results: DRGs significantly reduced the length of stay of patients undergoing C-secs, hysterectomies, and adnexectomies (8.0±6.9vs. 6.0±2.3 days, 7.4±3.5 vs. 6.4±2.7 days, 6.3±3.6 vs. 6.2±4.0 days, respectively, all p<0.001). Readmission rates decreased after introductionof DRGs (2.13% vs. 1.19% for C-secs, 4.51% vs. 3.05% for hysterectomies, 4.77% vs. 2.65% for adnexectomies, allp<0.001). Spillover rates did not change. Simultaneous surgeries, such as colpopexy and transobturator-tape procedures, duringhysterectomies decreased, while colporrhaphy during hysterectomies and adnexectomies or myomectomies during C-secs didnot change. The number of emergency operations for hysterectomies and adnexectomies decreased. Conclusion: Implementation of DRGs in the field of obstetrics and gynecology among Korean tertiary hospitals led to reductionsin the length of stay without increasing outpatient visits and readmission rates. The number of simultaneous surgeries requiringexpensive operative instruments and emergency operations decreased after introduction of the DRGs.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Kwon S, "Payment system reform for health care providers in Korea", Health Policy Plan, 18, pp.84~92 (2003)[DOI]
  2. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicators" (2011), OECD Publishing
  3. 최재우, "포괄수가제도 당연적용 효과평가", 보건행정학회지, 26(2), pp.135~147 (2016), 한국보건행정학회
  4. Hamada H, "Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-like grouping system (DPC", PDPS) on resource usage and healthcare quality in Japan, 2012, pp.107, 194~201
  5. Kim SJ, "The effect of competition on the relationship between the introduction of the DRG system and quality of care in Korea", Eur J Public Health, 26, pp.42~47 (2016)[DOI]
  6. Kim TH, "Effects of diagnosis-related group payment system on appendectomy outcomes", J Surg Res, 206, pp.347~354 (2016)[DOI]
  7. Tsai TC, "Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care", N Engl J Med, 369, pp.1134~1142 (2013)[DOI]
  8. Carroll NV, "Effect of the prospective-pricing system on drug use in Pennsylvania long-term-care facilities", Am J Hosp Pharm, 47, pp.2251~2254 (1990)
  9. Kahn KL, "The effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients. An introduction to the series", JAMA, 264, pp.1953~1955 (1990)[DOI]
  10. Fitzgerald JF, "Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system", JAMA, 258, pp.218~221 (1987)[DOI]
  11. Guterman S, "Impact of the medicare prospective payment system for hospitals", Health Care Financ Rev, 7, pp.97~114 (1986)
  12. Sloan FA, "Medicare prospective payment and the use of medical technologies in hospitals", Med Care, 26, pp.837~853 (1988)[DOI]
  13. Wood JB, "The impact of DRGs on community-based service providers: implications for the elderly", Am J Public Health, 80, pp.840~843 (1990)[DOI]
  14. Weinberger M, "Prospective reimbursement and diabetes mellitus. Impact upon glycemic control and utilization of health services", Med Care, 26, pp.77~83 (1988)[DOI]
  15. Leibson CL, "Trends in elderly hospitalization and readmission rates for a geographically defined population: pre- and post-prospective payment", J Am Geriatr Soc, 39, pp.895~904 (1991)[DOI]
  16. Gay EG, "Regulation, retrenchment--the DRG experience: problems from changing reimbursement practice", Soc Sci Med, 31, pp.1103~1118 (1990)[DOI]
  17. Brizioli E, "Hospital payment system based on diagnosis related groups in Italy: early effects on elderly patients with heart failure", Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 23, pp.347~355 (1996)[DOI]
  18. 최재욱, "포괄수가제 시행으로 인한 의료비 감소와 의료의 질", 대한의사협회지, 55(8), pp.706~709 (2012), 대한의사협회[DOI]
  19. Epstein AM, "Trends in length of stay and rates of readmission in Massachusetts: implications for monitoring quality of care", Inquiry, 28, pp.19~28 (1991)
  20. Kim JW, "Impact of the new payment system on laparoscopic appendectomy in Korea", J Surg Res, 199, pp.338~344 (2015)[DOI]
  21. Jeon MJ, "Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 66, pp.268~273 (2008)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)