본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Real-World Effectiveness of Omalizumab Treatment in Adult Asthma Patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: Omalizumab improves clinical outcomes for patients with severe asthma (SA), but its long-term effectiveness and potential biomarkers for predicting patient response require further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in treating SA and to identify potential biomarkers for predicting a favorable treatment response. Materials and Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared between asthma patients receiving omalizumab (omalizumab group) and those on inhaled corticosteroid with long-acting beta-agonist (ICS-LABA) alone (ICS-LABA group). Propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). Study outcomes included severe asthma exacerbation (SAE), incompletely controlled asthma, intravenous (IV) corticosteroid use, and asthma-related hospitalization. Incompletely controlled asthma was defined by blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/μL, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥25 ppb, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) <80%, or SAE occurrence. Results: The omalizumab group had significantly lower risks of SAE (HR 0.17, p=0.03), incompletely controlled asthma (HR 0.56, p=0.04), IV corticosteroid treatment (HR 0.38, p=0.02), and asthma-related hospitalization (HR 0.27, p=0.05). Blood eosinophil count stayed lower in the omalizumab group. FEV1% was higher with the omalizumab group, while blood neutrophil count, FeNO, and serum total IgE showed no differences. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed patients with treatment-favorable response (>50% reduction in systemic corticosteroid dose) exhibited decreased blood neutrophil counts but increased FEV1% and serum total IgE levels compared with the treatment-unfavorable group. Conclusion: Omalizumab treatment effectively reduces SAE and improves lung function and asthma control. Blood neutrophil counts and serum total IgE may be potential biomarkers for predicting favorable responses to omalizumab treatment.

Abstract

Purpose: Omalizumab improves clinical outcomes for patients with severe asthma (SA), but its long-term effectiveness and potential biomarkers for predicting patient response require further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in treating SA and to identify potential biomarkers for predicting a favorable treatment response. Materials and Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared between asthma patients receiving omalizumab (omalizumab group) and those on inhaled corticosteroid with long-acting beta-agonist (ICS-LABA) alone (ICS-LABA group). Propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). Study outcomes included severe asthma exacerbation (SAE), incompletely controlled asthma, intravenous (IV) corticosteroid use, and asthma-related hospitalization. Incompletely controlled asthma was defined by blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/μL, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥25 ppb, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) <80%, or SAE occurrence. Results: The omalizumab group had significantly lower risks of SAE (HR 0.17, p=0.03), incompletely controlled asthma (HR 0.56, p=0.04), IV corticosteroid treatment (HR 0.38, p=0.02), and asthma-related hospitalization (HR 0.27, p=0.05). Blood eosinophil count stayed lower in the omalizumab group. FEV1% was higher with the omalizumab group, while blood neutrophil count, FeNO, and serum total IgE showed no differences. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed patients with treatment-favorable response (>50% reduction in systemic corticosteroid dose) exhibited decreased blood neutrophil counts but increased FEV1% and serum total IgE levels compared with the treatment-unfavorable group. Conclusion: Omalizumab treatment effectively reduces SAE and improves lung function and asthma control. Blood neutrophil counts and serum total IgE may be potential biomarkers for predicting favorable responses to omalizumab treatment.

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of omalizumab as add-on therapy to Quality of Life Questionnaire for Korean Asthmatics (KAQLQ) in Korean patients with severe persistent allergic asthmaByoung-Whui Choi, Choon-Sik Park, Dong-Chull Choi, Hae-Sim Park, Hee-Bom Moon, Ho Joo Yoon, Inseon S. Choi, Jae-Woo Jung, Jong-Myung Lee, Jung Won Park, Sang-Heon Cho, Soon Seog Kwon대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제4호The Clinical Efficacy of Type 2 Inflammation-Specific Agents Targeting Interleukins in Reducing Exacerbations in Severe Asthma: A Meta-Analysis김이형, 송재욱, 이종후연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2022 · 제63권 제6호Biological treatments for severe asthma진현정영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2020 · 제37권 제4호Effects of Asthma Medication Type on Asthma Exacerbation in a Real-World Setting김창화, 박혜정, 변민광, 이재욱, 조재화, 최용준연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2022 · 제63권 제7호The Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR): real world research in severe asthma이현, 조유숙, Heung-Woo Park, Ho Joo Yoon, Joo-Hee Kim, Sang-Heon Kim, So Young Park, So-Young Park, Woo-Jung Song대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2022 · 제37권 제2호Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Korean patients with severe eosinophilic asthma from the DREAM and MENSA studiesBhabita Mayer, Choon-Sik Park, Frank C. Albers, Hae-Sim Park, Mi-Kyeong Kim, Namhee Kwon, Soung-Jun Min, Steven W. Yancey대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)