환동해문화권의 전기신석기시대 교차편년 연구 - 한반도 동해안∼연해주∼아무르 강 하류를 중심으로 -
The study of cross dating of early Neolithic in the Pan-eastern sea cultural area
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Osanri site on the East Sea, which was found in the 1980s, belongs to the early history of the Sea and has made a new impact on researches on Korea's prehistoric age. Yet, the documents on the Osanri C zone, Mangsangdong, and the Munamri site have been recently reported without their genealogy being examined thoroughly. the document about the Osanri C zone shows fairly stable stratum with the ceramic development stage, starting from the lowest ceramics, the mixed type of red burnished ceramics and Abnalmun (nail-pressed pattern), to ceramics without any patterns, to red burnished ceramics (the 1st stage of the Osanri C zone), to Osanri-type ceramics (the 2nd stage of the Osanri C zone), to ceramics with raised designs (the 3rd stage of the Osanri C zone). The archaeological feature of the 1st type of the East Sea is called the Malyshevo Culture of Amur which is consisted of the mix of red burnished ceramic and Abnalmun (punctured-pressed pattern). And the absolute age of the Malyshevo culture says it started earlier at 7000B.P. and coincides with the age of the 1st type of the East Sea, around 6000-5800B.P. Moreover, The clay figures that were found in the Osanri C zone are very similar to those of the Malyshevo culture. Abnalmun at the rims and raised-design ceramics which represent the 2nd type of the East Sea is very similar to those of the Type of Sergeyvka. During the mid Neolithic era, comb ceramics of the pointed bottoms appeared after the 1st and 2nd types of the East Sea. In this regard, the 1st and 2nd types of the East Sea which seem to have existed earlier than comb ceramics can be recognized as a specific culture and they could be dubbed the Upper and Lower culture of Osanri.
Abstract
The Osanri site on the East Sea, which was found in the 1980s, belongs to the early history of the Sea and has made a new impact on researches on Korea's prehistoric age. Yet, the documents on the Osanri C zone, Mangsangdong, and the Munamri site have been recently reported without their genealogy being examined thoroughly. the document about the Osanri C zone shows fairly stable stratum with the ceramic development stage, starting from the lowest ceramics, the mixed type of red burnished ceramics and Abnalmun (nail-pressed pattern), to ceramics without any patterns, to red burnished ceramics (the 1st stage of the Osanri C zone), to Osanri-type ceramics (the 2nd stage of the Osanri C zone), to ceramics with raised designs (the 3rd stage of the Osanri C zone). The archaeological feature of the 1st type of the East Sea is called the Malyshevo Culture of Amur which is consisted of the mix of red burnished ceramic and Abnalmun (punctured-pressed pattern). And the absolute age of the Malyshevo culture says it started earlier at 7000B.P. and coincides with the age of the 1st type of the East Sea, around 6000-5800B.P. Moreover, The clay figures that were found in the Osanri C zone are very similar to those of the Malyshevo culture. Abnalmun at the rims and raised-design ceramics which represent the 2nd type of the East Sea is very similar to those of the Type of Sergeyvka. During the mid Neolithic era, comb ceramics of the pointed bottoms appeared after the 1st and 2nd types of the East Sea. In this regard, the 1st and 2nd types of the East Sea which seem to have existed earlier than comb ceramics can be recognized as a specific culture and they could be dubbed the Upper and Lower culture of Osanri.
참고문헌 (37)
- 고동순, "양양 오산리유적 발굴조사 개보", 韓國新石器硏究, 13 (2007)
- 고동순, "동해안 오산리 C지구 최하층유적의 성과, In 新石器時代 漁撈와 海洋文化" (2009)
- 러시아아무르강 하류 수추섬 신석기시대 주거 유적 발굴조사보고서, "국립문화재연구소", ~ (2001)
- 러시아아무르강 하류 수추섬 신석기시대 주거 유적 발굴조사보고서(II), "국립문화재연구소", ~ (2002)
- 러시아아무르강 하류 수추섬 신석기시대 주거 유적 발굴조사보고서(III), "국립문화재연구소", ~ (2003)
- 국립문화재연구소, "高城 文岩里 遺蹟", ~ (2004)
- 국립문화재연구소, "아무르․연해주의 신비", ~ (2006)
- 金壯錫, "오산리토기의 연구 : 상대편년 및 타지역과의 관계", 석사, 고고미술사학, pp.1991
- 김재윤, "선사시대의 극동전신상 토우와 환동해문화권", 한국상고사학보, 60(60), pp.41~72 (2008), 한국상고사학회
- 김재윤, "서포항 유적의 신석기시대 편년 재고", 한국고고학보, (71), pp.4~45 (2009), 한국고고학회
- 金恩榮, "한반도 중부지역 신석기시대 평저토기의 시공적 위치에 대하여, In 석헌정징원정년퇴임기념논총" (2006)
- 김은영, "고성 문암리유적을 통해 본 신석기시대 평저토기문화의 전개", 문화재, (40), pp.169~205 (2007), 국립문화재연구소
- 예맥문화재연구원, "東海 望祥洞遺蹟 I", ~ (2008)
- 임상택, "빗살무늬토기문화의 지역적 전개-중서부지역과 강원영동지역을 대상으로", 한국신석기연구 (2001)
- 서울대학교, "鰲山里유적", ~ (1984)
- 서울대학교 박물관, "鰲山里유적 II", ~ (1985)
- 서울대학교 박물관, "鰲山里유적 III", ~ (1988)
- 하인수, "오산리토기의 재검토-III~V층 출토토기를 중심으로", 박물관연구논집, 3 (1995)
- 하인수, "韓半島 南部地域 櫛文土器 硏究", 민족문화, ~ (2006)
- 韓永熙, "地域的 비교", 한국사론, 12 (1983), 국사편찬위원회
- 崔鐘赫, "生業活動에서 본 韓半島 新石器文化", 新石器硏究, (2) (2001)
- 田中聰一, "한국 중동부지방 신석기토기에 대하여-양양 오산리 유적출토 오산리식 토기의 검토를 중심으로-", 문물연구, 4 (2000)
- Алексеев В.П., "Неолит юга Дальнего Востока: Древнее поселение в пещере Чертовы Ворота, In 남극동의 신석기시대: 쵸르토븨 바로타 유적" (1991)
- 바타르쉐프, "루드나야 문화 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 바타르쉐프, "연해주의 세르게예프카 유형의 토기연구, In 오클라드니코프 탄생 100주년 기념논총" (2008)
- 바타르쉐프, "연해주의 루드나야 고고문화연구" (2005)
- 디코프, "연해주의 루드나야 프린스턴 유적과 신석기 문화의 편년", ~ (1992)
- 메드베제프, "아무르강 하류의 신석기 문화, In 극동의 선사와 고대" (2005)
- 모레바, "보이스만 문화의 토기", 박사, pp.2005
- 몬가이트, "소련 고고학" (1955)
- 데레뱐코, "가샤 유적 연구" (1993)
- 데레뱐코, "가샤 유적 연구", ~ (1994)
- 데레뱐코, "가샤 유적 연구", ~ (1995)
- 오클라드니코프, "푸후순 만의 고대 유적, In 극동의 고고학과 민속학" (1964)
- 오클라드니코프, "시베리아와 극동의 신석기시대, In 소련의 석기시대" (1970)
- 클류에프, "쉐클라에보-7 유적연구, In 러시아와 태평양" (2003)
- 파포프, "루자노바 소프카-2 유적의 루드나야 문화의 토기 연구" (2007)