본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이원 중합 레진시멘트의 수분 흡착도와 수분 흡착에 따른 경도 변화 비교 연구

A study on the water sorption and the effect of water sorption on micro-hardness of dual-cure resin cements

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 다양한 이원 중합 레진 시멘트의 수분 흡착도를 조사하고, 수분 흡착에 따른 미세 경도 변화를 비교해보는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 다섯 가지의 이원중합 레진시멘트를 선정하였다(Maxcem, Duo-link, Panavia F, VariolinkⅡ, Rely X Unicem). 각 그룹 당 10개씩, 총 50개의 시편을 제작하였다.각 그룹 당 5개의 시편들을 증류수에 7일 동안 보관 후 수분 흡착도를 평가하였다. 증류수에 보관한 시편과 보관하지 않은 시편들을 비교하여 결과를 얻었다. 결과: 1. 수분 흡착도에 있어서 Maxcem이 유의성 있게 가장 높았다. 2. 증류수에 보관하지 않았던 시편의 미세 경도는 Rely X Unicem의 유의성 있게 가장 높았다. 3. 증류수에 보관하였던 시편의 미세 경도는 Rely X Unicem이 유의성 있게 가장 높았다. 4. 수분 흡수에 따른 미세 경도의 변화에 있어서 VariolinkⅡ는차이가없는것으로나타났으나, Duo-link,Panavia F, 그리고 Rely X Unicem은 감소되었으며, Maxcem은 증가되었다. 결론: 임상적으로 레진시멘트 선택시 수분 흡착도가 작고, 미세 경도가 높은 재료를 선택하는 것이 추천된다.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the water sorption of commonly used dual-cure resin cements and compared the change in the micro-hardness among the cements. Materials and Methods: Five types of dual-cure resin cements (Maxcem, Duo-link, Panavia F, Variolink II, Rely X Unicem) were selected. Fifty specimens were classified into five groups containing ten specimens in each group. The water sorption of the five specimens in each group was evaluated after being immersed in distilled water (DDW) for seven days. The following results were obtained by comparing the specimens immersed in DDW with those not immersed in DDW. Results: 1. The water sorption of Maxcem showed the highest score, followed by Panavia F. These two cements were followed by Duo-link and Rely X Unicem. The water sorption of Variolink II showed the lowest score among the cements used in this study. 2. Among the specimens not immersed in DDW, the micro-hardness of Rely X Unicem showed the highest score followed by Panavia F and Variolink II. These cements were followed in order by Duo-link and Maxcem. 3. Among the specimens immersed in DDW, the microhardness of Rely X Unicem showed the highest score followed by Maxcem, Panavia F and Variolink II. Duo-link shoed the lowest score among the cements used in this study. 4. Maxcem, Duo-link, Panavia F and Rely X Unicem showed significant differences in micro-hardness due to water resorption but Variolink II was unaffected by immersion in water. Conclusion: Using the resin cement which has lower water sorption and higher micro-hardness is recommended.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Sidney K, "Invisible-Esthetic ceramic restoration", pp.23~78 (2008), A-Editora Artes Medicas
  2. Li ZC, "Mechanical properties of dental luting cements", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.597~609 (1999)
  3. Caughman WF, "Shedding new light on composite polymerization", Oper Dent, 27, pp.636~638 (2002)
  4. Peutzfeldt A, "Dual-cure resin cements: in vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing", Acta Odontol Scand, 53, pp.29~34 (1995)
  5. El-Mowafy OM, "Influence of composite inlay", onlay thickness on hardening of dualcured resin cements, 2000, pp.66, 147~
  6. Osborne JW, "A method for assessing the clinical solubility and disintegration of luting cements", J Prosthet Dent, 40, pp.413~417 (1978)
  7. Lacefield WR, "Tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement", J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp.194~198 (1985)
  8. Richter WA, "Clinical evaluation of dental cement durability", J Prosthet Dent, 33, pp.294~299 (1975)
  9. Ortengren U, "Water sorption and flexural properties of a composite resin cement", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.141~147 (2000)
  10. Krejci I, "Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.233~244 (1994)
  11. Feilzer AJ, "The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements", Dent Mater, 11, pp.186~190 (1995)
  12. Meşe A, "Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions", Dent Mater J, 27, pp.702~709 (2008)
  13. Gerdolle DA, "Water sorption and water solubility of current luting cements: an in vitro study", Quintessence Int, 39, pp.107~114 (2008)
  14. Vermilyea S, "Rotational viscometry of a zinc phosphate and a zinc polyacrylate cement", J Dent Res, 56, pp.762~767 (1977)
  15. Wilson AD, "Glass-ionomer cement", pp.131~141 (1988), Quintessence Publishing Co
  16. Cheylan JM, "In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.365~370 (2002)
  17. Abo-Hamar SE, "Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel", Clin Oral Investig, 9, pp.161~167 (2005)
  18. Brunton PA, "Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics", Br Dent J, 198, pp.99~103 (2005)
  19. Bouillaguet S, "Bonding to dentin achieved by general practitioners", Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 112, pp.1006~1011 (2002)
  20. White SN, "Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.156~161 (1992)
  21. Tjan AH, "Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.11~15 (1992)
  22. Yoshida K, "In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.285~291 (1998)
  23. Reports of councils and bureaus revised American national standards institute, "American Dental Association", American dental association, ~, pp.American dental association specification No. 27 (1993)
  24. Ferracane JL, "Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins", Dent Mater, 1, pp.11~14 (1985)
  25. Rueggeberg FA, "Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite", J Dent Res, 67, pp.932~937 (1988)
  26. Ozturk N, "Degree of conversion and surface hardness of resin cement cured with different curing units", Quintessence Int, 36, pp.771~777 (2005)
  27. Hofmann N, "Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites", Clin Oral Investig, 4, pp.140~147 (2004)
  28. Kanchanavasita W, "Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glassionomer cements", Biomaterials, 18, pp.343~349 (1997)
  29. Ferracane JL, "Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composite", J Dent Res, 66, pp.1140~1145 (1987)
  30. Cho E, "Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials", Quintessence Int, 26, pp.351~358 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)