시멘트혼합처리공법이 적용된 지반의 수치해석 방법에 관한 연구
The Study on The Numerical Analysis Method for Ground Improved by Cement Mixing Method
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
복합지반 설계법은 계산이나 수치해석시 적용하기 편리하여 시멘트혼합처리공법의 설계시 많은 설계자들에 의해 적용되고있다. 그러나, 복합지반 설계법은 다짐말뚝공법(SCP, GCP)에 관하여 개발된 것으로 시멘트혼합처리공법에 대한 시험시공등의 실제 결과와의 비교 분석은 미미하다. 본 연구에서는 2차원 유한요소 수치해석을 통해 복합지반 해석법, 개별말뚝해석법등 다양한 해석법의 결과를 실측과 비교 분석하였다. 본 연구 결과, 지표면에서의 침하는 Plate 요소만을 적용하는 방법의침하량이 실측에 비해 크게 예측되었고, 기타 방법은 유사한 것으로 나타났다. 개량지반 직하부에서만 발생된 침하량의 크기가크게 나타났고, 침하량, 수평변위 및 지반반력 등에 대하여 실측과 수치해석 결과를 비교하면 등가벽 개념의 개별말뚝 해석법이 가장 유사한 것으로 나타났다. 복합지반법의 경우 응력전이(지반아칭) 현상을 예측하지 못하였고, 수평변위를 과대 예측하는 것으로 나타났다.
Abstract
Since the composite ground design method is easy to apply for calculation or numerical analysis, it is applied to the design of cement mixing methods. However, the comparison studies between analysis and actual results such as a trial test and construction for the cement mixing method are few because the composite ground design method was developed for the compaction pile (SCP, GCP) methods. In this study, the results of various analysis methods, such as the composite ground analysis method (1 case) and the individual pile method (3 cases), were compared with actual measurements through a two-dimensional finite element numerical analysis. In case of the surface settlements, the results of study show that the individual plate method was larger than the actual measurements, while other methods are similar. The settlements at the under ground of the improved area is overestimated in all analysis methods. When comparing numerical analysis results for the horizontal displacement, and ground reaction forces, the individual pile method in equivalent wall concept was found to be the most similar to the measurements. The composite ground method was not able to predict the behavior of stress transfer (Arching effect) and it turned out that the prediction of horizontal displacement was too large.
참고문헌 (14)
- Abusharar, S. W., "Two-dimensional deep-seated slope stability analysis of embankments over stone column improved soft clay", Engineering Geology, 120(4), pp.103~110 (2011)
- Bergado, D. T., "Improvement techniques of soft ground in subsiding and lowland environment" (1994), Balkeman
- Chai J., "A method for predicting consolidation settlements of floating column improved clayey subsoil", Front Archit Civil Eng China, 4(2), pp.241~251 (2010)
- Chai J., "Deformation Analysis in Soft Ground Improvement" (2011), Springer
- Chai, J. C., "Settlement prediction for soft ground improved by columns", Ground Improvement, 163, pp.109~119 (2010)
- DWRI, "Manual for A Low Improvement Ratio Cement Column (ALiCC) Method", ALiCC Method Association in Japan, ~ (2015)
- Japan Institute of Construction Engineering, "Flexible foundation, foundation structure part, design code for flexible box culvert–II", pp.233~248 (1999), San-kai-dou Press
- KSCE, "Road Bridge Design Standards", ~ (2008)
- Lorenzo, G. A., "New consolidation equation for soil-cement pile improved ground", Can Geotech. J, 40, pp.265~275 (2003)
- Miao, L., "Consolidation of a double layered compressible foundation partially penetrated by deep mixed column", J. of Geotech. & Geoenviron Eng., ASCE, 134(8), pp.121~1214 (2008)
- Navin, M. P., "Stability of embankments founded on deep-mixing-method columns:Three-dimensional considerations", Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, pp.1229~1230 (2005)
- Shien, N. K., "Numerical Study Of Floating Stone Columns", pp.2013
- 신현영, "말뚝식과 블록식이 혼합된 시멘트혼합처리공법(DCM)의 구조체 해석 비교 연구", 한국지반공학회논문집, 30(4), pp.5~19 (2014), 한국지반공학회
- Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundations - Vol. I and II, "FHWA", Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, ~, pp.Report No. FHWA-NHI-05-042and FHWA-NHI-05-043 (2006)